AN ASSESSMENT OF MODERN INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS THEORY

Bledar Kurti
{"title":"AN ASSESSMENT OF MODERN INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS THEORY","authors":"Bledar Kurti","doi":"10.58885/ijllis.v13i1.49bk","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The scholarship of traditional International Relations Theory (IR) seems that has little to say to students, academicians and analysts at present days. The events of the last decade in world politics and the present geopolitical situation seem to have passed the centuries old relations between nations, accompanied with a new and unprecedented approach to international formal conventions and agreements. Modern political leaders often use elements of traditional IR theory when articulating solutions to national and international security dilemmas. But these solutions then translate into modern policies capturing courses of action for accomplishing national objectives with varying strategic implications. It appears that policies of today convert into acts aiming at strengthening power and influence, via corporations and military means. This paper presents the incompatibility of traditional IR theory with the modern one, accompanied with examples and analysis of the key events that have startled academicians, students and interpreters of IR studies.","PeriodicalId":364929,"journal":{"name":"ANGLISTICUM. Journal of the Association-Institute for English Language and American Studies","volume":"12 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ANGLISTICUM. Journal of the Association-Institute for English Language and American Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58885/ijllis.v13i1.49bk","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The scholarship of traditional International Relations Theory (IR) seems that has little to say to students, academicians and analysts at present days. The events of the last decade in world politics and the present geopolitical situation seem to have passed the centuries old relations between nations, accompanied with a new and unprecedented approach to international formal conventions and agreements. Modern political leaders often use elements of traditional IR theory when articulating solutions to national and international security dilemmas. But these solutions then translate into modern policies capturing courses of action for accomplishing national objectives with varying strategic implications. It appears that policies of today convert into acts aiming at strengthening power and influence, via corporations and military means. This paper presents the incompatibility of traditional IR theory with the modern one, accompanied with examples and analysis of the key events that have startled academicians, students and interpreters of IR studies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对现代国际关系理论的评估
传统的国际关系理论(IR)对当今的学生、学者和分析家来说似乎已经没有什么可说的了。过去十年中发生的世界政治事件和当前的地缘政治局势似乎已经超越了几个世纪以来的国家间关系,并伴随着一种前所未有的新方法来处理国际正式公约和协定。现代政治领导人在阐述国家和国际安全困境的解决方案时,经常使用传统国际关系理论的要素。但这些解决方案随后会转化为现代政策,成为实现国家目标的行动方针,并产生不同的战略影响。当今的政策似乎转化为旨在通过企业和军事手段加强权力和影响力的行为。本文介绍了传统 IR 理论与现代 IR 理论的不相容性,并举例分析了令 IR 研究的学者、学生和解释者震惊的关键事件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
THE ADMISSION OF ALBANIA TO THE LEAGUE OF NATIONS REGARDING EXPLANATION OF INTERNATIONAL TERM ELEMENTS IN THE UZBEK DICTIONARIES BASIC COGNITIVE CONSTRUCTIVIST APPROACHES IN LANGUAGE LEARNING (OBJECT PERFORMANCE FOCUS (OPF), USING PODCASTING AS A RESOURCE) THE NEED FOR COMPARABLE CORPORA IN TRANSLATION TEACHING AND LEARNING AN ASSESSMENT OF MODERN INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS THEORY
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1