Accurate assessment of land–atmosphere coupling in climate models requires high-frequency data output

IF 4 3区 地球科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Geoscientific Model Development Pub Date : 2024-02-29 DOI:10.5194/gmd-17-1869-2024
K. Findell, Zun Yin, Eunkyo Seo, P. Dirmeyer, Nathan P. Arnold, Nathaniel Chaney, Megan D. Fowler, Meng-Tian Huang, David M. Lawrence, Po-Lun Ma, Joseph A. Santanello Jr.
{"title":"Accurate assessment of land–atmosphere coupling in climate models requires high-frequency data output","authors":"K. Findell, Zun Yin, Eunkyo Seo, P. Dirmeyer, Nathan P. Arnold, Nathaniel Chaney, Megan D. Fowler, Meng-Tian Huang, David M. Lawrence, Po-Lun Ma, Joseph A. Santanello Jr.","doi":"10.5194/gmd-17-1869-2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Land–atmosphere (L–A) interactions are important for understanding convective processes, climate feedbacks, the development and perpetuation of droughts, heatwaves, pluvials, and other land-centered climate anomalies. Local L–A coupling (LoCo) metrics capture relevant L–A processes, highlighting the impact of soil and vegetation states on surface flux partitioning and the impact of surface fluxes on boundary layer (BL) growth and development and the entrainment of air above the BL. A primary goal of the Climate Process Team in the Coupling Land and Atmospheric Subgrid Parameterizations (CLASP) project is parameterizing and characterizing the impact of subgrid heterogeneity in global and regional Earth system models (ESMs) to improve the connection between land and atmospheric states and processes. A critical step in achieving that aim is the incorporation of L–A metrics, especially LoCo metrics, into climate model diagnostic process streams. However, because land–atmosphere interactions span timescales of minutes (e.g., turbulent fluxes), hours (e.g., BL growth and decay), days (e.g., soil moisture memory), and seasons (e.g., variability in behavioral regimes between soil moisture and latent heat flux), with multiple processes of interest happening in different geographic regions at different times of year, there is not a single metric that captures all the modes, means, and methods of interaction between the land and the atmosphere. And while monthly means of most of the LoCo-relevant variables are routinely saved from ESM simulations, data storage constraints typically preclude routine archival of the hourly data that would enable the calculation of all LoCo metrics. Here, we outline a reasonable data request that would allow for adequate characterization of sub-daily coupling processes between the land and the atmosphere, preserving enough sub-daily output to describe, analyze, and better understand L–A coupling in modern climate models. A secondary request involves embedding calculations within the models to determine mean properties in and above the BL to further improve characterization of model behavior. Higher-frequency model output will (i) allow for more direct comparison with observational field campaigns on process-relevant timescales, (ii) enable demonstration of inter-model spread in L–A coupling processes, and (iii) aid in targeted identification of sources of deficiencies and opportunities for improvement of the models.\n","PeriodicalId":12799,"journal":{"name":"Geoscientific Model Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoscientific Model Development","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1869-2024","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract. Land–atmosphere (L–A) interactions are important for understanding convective processes, climate feedbacks, the development and perpetuation of droughts, heatwaves, pluvials, and other land-centered climate anomalies. Local L–A coupling (LoCo) metrics capture relevant L–A processes, highlighting the impact of soil and vegetation states on surface flux partitioning and the impact of surface fluxes on boundary layer (BL) growth and development and the entrainment of air above the BL. A primary goal of the Climate Process Team in the Coupling Land and Atmospheric Subgrid Parameterizations (CLASP) project is parameterizing and characterizing the impact of subgrid heterogeneity in global and regional Earth system models (ESMs) to improve the connection between land and atmospheric states and processes. A critical step in achieving that aim is the incorporation of L–A metrics, especially LoCo metrics, into climate model diagnostic process streams. However, because land–atmosphere interactions span timescales of minutes (e.g., turbulent fluxes), hours (e.g., BL growth and decay), days (e.g., soil moisture memory), and seasons (e.g., variability in behavioral regimes between soil moisture and latent heat flux), with multiple processes of interest happening in different geographic regions at different times of year, there is not a single metric that captures all the modes, means, and methods of interaction between the land and the atmosphere. And while monthly means of most of the LoCo-relevant variables are routinely saved from ESM simulations, data storage constraints typically preclude routine archival of the hourly data that would enable the calculation of all LoCo metrics. Here, we outline a reasonable data request that would allow for adequate characterization of sub-daily coupling processes between the land and the atmosphere, preserving enough sub-daily output to describe, analyze, and better understand L–A coupling in modern climate models. A secondary request involves embedding calculations within the models to determine mean properties in and above the BL to further improve characterization of model behavior. Higher-frequency model output will (i) allow for more direct comparison with observational field campaigns on process-relevant timescales, (ii) enable demonstration of inter-model spread in L–A coupling processes, and (iii) aid in targeted identification of sources of deficiencies and opportunities for improvement of the models.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
准确评估气候模型中的陆地-大气耦合需要高频数据输出
摘要。陆地-大气(L-A)相互作用对于理解对流过程、气候反馈、干旱、热浪、暴雨和其他以陆地为中心的气候异常的发展和延续非常重要。局部陆地-大气耦合(LoCo)指标捕捉了相关的陆地-大气过程,突出了土壤和植被状况对地表通量分区的影响,以及地表通量对边界层(BL)生长发育和边界层上方空气夹带的影响。陆地和大气子网格参数化耦合(CLASP)项目气候过程小组的一个主要目标是对全球和区域地球系统模式(ESM)中子网格异质性的影响进行参数化和特征描述,以改善陆地和大气状态及过程之间的联系。实现这一目标的关键步骤是将陆地-大气指标,尤其是陆地-大气指标纳入气候模式诊断过程流。然而,由于陆地与大气相互作用的时间尺度跨越分钟(如湍流通量)、小时(如 BL 生长和衰减)、天(如土壤水分记忆)和季节(如土壤水分和潜热通量之间行为机制的变异性),在一年中的不同时间,不同地理区域会发生多个感兴趣的过程,因此没有一个单一的指标可以捕捉陆地与大气之间相互作用的所有模式、平均值和方法。虽然大多数与陆地和大气相互作用相关的变量的月平均值都能从 ESM 模拟中例行保存下来,但由于数据存储的限制,通常无法对小时数据进行例行存档,从而无法计算所有的陆地和大气相互作用指标。在这里,我们概述了一个合理的数据要求,它可以充分描述陆地和大气之间的亚日耦合过程,保留足够的亚日输出,以描述、分析和更好地理解现代气候模式中的陆地-大气耦合。第二项要求是在模式中嵌入计算,以确定 BL 内和 BL 上的平均特性,从而进一步改进模式行为的特征描述。更高频率的模式输出将:(i) 允许在与过程相关的时间尺度上与观测野外活动进行更直接的比较;(ii) 能够展示 L-A 耦合过程中模式间的差异;(iii) 有助于有针对性地确定缺陷的来源和改进模式的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Geoscientific Model Development
Geoscientific Model Development GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
9.80%
发文量
352
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Geoscientific Model Development (GMD) is an international scientific journal dedicated to the publication and public discussion of the description, development, and evaluation of numerical models of the Earth system and its components. The following manuscript types can be considered for peer-reviewed publication: * geoscientific model descriptions, from statistical models to box models to GCMs; * development and technical papers, describing developments such as new parameterizations or technical aspects of running models such as the reproducibility of results; * new methods for assessment of models, including work on developing new metrics for assessing model performance and novel ways of comparing model results with observational data; * papers describing new standard experiments for assessing model performance or novel ways of comparing model results with observational data; * model experiment descriptions, including experimental details and project protocols; * full evaluations of previously published models.
期刊最新文献
An improved global pressure and zenith wet delay model with optimized vertical correction considering the spatiotemporal variability in multiple height-scale factors Radiocarbon analysis reveals underestimation of soil organic carbon persistence in new-generation soil models HSW-V v1.0: localized injections of interactive volcanic aerosols and their climate impacts in a simple general circulation model Multivariate adjustment of drizzle bias using machine learning in European climate projections Incorporating Oxygen Isotopes of Oxidized Reactive Nitrogen in the Regional Atmospheric Chemistry Mechanism, version 2 (ICOIN-RACM2)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1