Multivariate adjustment of drizzle bias using machine learning in European climate projections

IF 4 3区 地球科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Geoscientific Model Development Pub Date : 2024-06-13 DOI:10.5194/gmd-17-4689-2024
G. Lazoglou, Theo Economou, Christina Anagnostopoulou, G. Zittis, Anna Tzyrkalli, Pantelis Georgiades, J. Lelieveld
{"title":"Multivariate adjustment of drizzle bias using machine learning in European climate projections","authors":"G. Lazoglou, Theo Economou, Christina Anagnostopoulou, G. Zittis, Anna Tzyrkalli, Pantelis Georgiades, J. Lelieveld","doi":"10.5194/gmd-17-4689-2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Precipitation holds significant importance as a climate parameter in various applications, including studies on the impacts of climate change. However, its simulation or projection accuracy is low, primarily due to its high stochasticity. Specifically, climate models often overestimate the frequency of light rainy days while simultaneously underestimating the total amounts of extreme observed precipitation. This phenomenon, known as “drizzle bias”, specifically refers to the model's tendency to overestimate the occurrence of light precipitation events. Consequently, even though the overall precipitation totals are generally well represented, there is often a significant bias in the number of rainy days. The present study aims to minimize the drizzle bias in model output by developing and applying two statistical approaches. In the first approach, the number of rainy days is adjusted based on the assumption that the relationship between observed and simulated rainy days remains the same in time (thresholding). In the second, a machine learning method (random forest or RF) is used for the development of a statistical model that describes the relationship between several climate (modelled) variables and the observed number of wet days. The results demonstrate that employing a multivariate approach yields results that are comparable to the conventional thresholding approach when correcting sub-periods with similar climate characteristics. However, the importance of utilizing RF becomes evident when addressing periods exhibiting extreme events, marked by a significantly distinct frequency of rainy days. These disparities are particularly pronounced when considering higher temporal resolutions. Both methods are illustrated on data from three EURO-CORDEX climate models. The two approaches are trained during a calibration period, and they are applied for the selected evaluation period.\n","PeriodicalId":12799,"journal":{"name":"Geoscientific Model Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoscientific Model Development","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4689-2024","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract. Precipitation holds significant importance as a climate parameter in various applications, including studies on the impacts of climate change. However, its simulation or projection accuracy is low, primarily due to its high stochasticity. Specifically, climate models often overestimate the frequency of light rainy days while simultaneously underestimating the total amounts of extreme observed precipitation. This phenomenon, known as “drizzle bias”, specifically refers to the model's tendency to overestimate the occurrence of light precipitation events. Consequently, even though the overall precipitation totals are generally well represented, there is often a significant bias in the number of rainy days. The present study aims to minimize the drizzle bias in model output by developing and applying two statistical approaches. In the first approach, the number of rainy days is adjusted based on the assumption that the relationship between observed and simulated rainy days remains the same in time (thresholding). In the second, a machine learning method (random forest or RF) is used for the development of a statistical model that describes the relationship between several climate (modelled) variables and the observed number of wet days. The results demonstrate that employing a multivariate approach yields results that are comparable to the conventional thresholding approach when correcting sub-periods with similar climate characteristics. However, the importance of utilizing RF becomes evident when addressing periods exhibiting extreme events, marked by a significantly distinct frequency of rainy days. These disparities are particularly pronounced when considering higher temporal resolutions. Both methods are illustrated on data from three EURO-CORDEX climate models. The two approaches are trained during a calibration period, and they are applied for the selected evaluation period.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在欧洲气候预测中利用机器学习对细雨偏差进行多变量调整
摘要降水量作为一个气候参数,在各种应用中具有重要意义,包括对气候变化影响的研究。然而,降水的模拟或预测精度较低,这主要是由于其高度随机性。具体来说,气候模型经常会高估小雨日的频率,同时低估观测到的极端降水总量。这种现象被称为 "小雨偏差",特指模式倾向于高估小雨降水事件的发生率。因此,尽管总体降水总量一般都得到了很好的体现,但雨天的数量往往存在明显偏差。本研究旨在通过开发和应用两种统计方法,尽量减少模式输出中的小雨偏差。在第一种方法中,根据观测到的降雨日数与模拟的降雨日数之间的关系在时间上保持不变的假设(阈值)来调整降雨日数。第二种方法是使用机器学习方法(随机森林或 RF)建立统计模型,描述多个气候(模拟)变量与观测到的降雨日数之间的关系。结果表明,在校正具有相似气候特征的子时段时,采用多元方法得出的结果与传统的阈值法相当。然而,在处理以明显不同的降雨日频率为标志的极端事件时期时,利用 RF 的重要性就显而易见了。这些差异在考虑更高的时间分辨率时尤为明显。这两种方法都在三个 EURO-CORDEX 气候模型的数据中进行了说明。这两种方法在校准期间进行了训练,并应用于选定的评估期。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Geoscientific Model Development
Geoscientific Model Development GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
9.80%
发文量
352
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Geoscientific Model Development (GMD) is an international scientific journal dedicated to the publication and public discussion of the description, development, and evaluation of numerical models of the Earth system and its components. The following manuscript types can be considered for peer-reviewed publication: * geoscientific model descriptions, from statistical models to box models to GCMs; * development and technical papers, describing developments such as new parameterizations or technical aspects of running models such as the reproducibility of results; * new methods for assessment of models, including work on developing new metrics for assessing model performance and novel ways of comparing model results with observational data; * papers describing new standard experiments for assessing model performance or novel ways of comparing model results with observational data; * model experiment descriptions, including experimental details and project protocols; * full evaluations of previously published models.
期刊最新文献
Multivariate adjustment of drizzle bias using machine learning in European climate projections Incorporating Oxygen Isotopes of Oxidized Reactive Nitrogen in the Regional Atmospheric Chemistry Mechanism, version 2 (ICOIN-RACM2) Dynamic ecosystem assembly and escaping the “fire trap” in the tropics: insights from FATES_15.0.0 StraitFlux – precise computations of water strait fluxes on various modeling grids Development and evaluation of the interactive Model for Air Pollution and Land Ecosystems (iMAPLE) version 1.0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1