Comparison of infusions of phenylephrine, norepinephrine, and mephentermine on
maternal hemodynamics and neonatal outcomes in caesarean section under spinal
anaesthesia
{"title":"Comparison of infusions of phenylephrine, norepinephrine, and mephentermine on\n maternal hemodynamics and neonatal outcomes in caesarean section under spinal\n anaesthesia","authors":"Laxman K Senapati","doi":"10.55522/jmpas.v13i1.5919","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although the subarachnoid block is the preferred anesthetic technique for the\n caesarean section, on the downside it is often associated with complications like\n maternal hypotension. We compared phenylephrine, norepinephrine, and mephentermine\n infusions to maintain blood pressure during the caesarian section under subarachnoid\n block. Our study included 240 parturients with singleton-term pregnancies undergoing a\n caesarian section under spinal anesthesia. Following spinal anesthesia till the delivery\n of the baby, parturients randomly assigned to three groups received phenylephrine,\n norepinephrine, and mephentermine infusions.Heart rate, blood pressure, intra-operative\n nausea and vomiting, neonatal Apgar score, and total rescue vasopressors required were\n analyzed. Except at 4 min (p=0.006), ANOVA revealed no statistically significant\n difference in systolic blood pressure between the groups across all time points.\n Systolic blood pressure showed a significant difference between the mephentermine group\n versus the phenylephrine group (p=0.013) and the norepinephrine group versus the\n phenylephrine group (p=0.022) at four minutes post hoc Bonferroni. Except at 15 and 60\n minutes (p=0.02 and p=0.001, Refer This Article Amit Pradhan, Rasulata Swain,\n Priyadarsini Samanta, Laxman K Senapati, Ganesh C Satapathy, 2024. Comparison of\n infusions of phenylephrine, norepinephrine, and Mephentermine on maternal hemodynamics\n and neonatal outcomes in caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia. . Journal of\n medical pharmaceutical and allied sciences, V 13 - I 1, Pages- 6392 – 6400. Doi:\n https://doi.org/10.55522/jmpas.V13I1.5919.respectively), the mean heart rate was\n comparable among the three groups. The Chi-square test revealed no statistically\n significant difference in the requirement of rescue drugs among the groups (ϰ2=1.57,\n p=0.45) except at the time point of 4 minutes (p=0.01) when the highest requirement was\n observed in the phenylephrine group. The Apgar scores amongst the groups were comparable\n at 1 min (p=0.99) and 5 min (p=0.98). In the lower segment caesarian section under the\n subarachnoid block, infusions of phenylephrine, norepinephrine, and mephentermine were\n equally effective in managing maternal hypotension and achieving favorable neonatal\n outcomes.","PeriodicalId":16445,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical pharmaceutical and allied sciences","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical pharmaceutical and allied sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55522/jmpas.v13i1.5919","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Although the subarachnoid block is the preferred anesthetic technique for the
caesarean section, on the downside it is often associated with complications like
maternal hypotension. We compared phenylephrine, norepinephrine, and mephentermine
infusions to maintain blood pressure during the caesarian section under subarachnoid
block. Our study included 240 parturients with singleton-term pregnancies undergoing a
caesarian section under spinal anesthesia. Following spinal anesthesia till the delivery
of the baby, parturients randomly assigned to three groups received phenylephrine,
norepinephrine, and mephentermine infusions.Heart rate, blood pressure, intra-operative
nausea and vomiting, neonatal Apgar score, and total rescue vasopressors required were
analyzed. Except at 4 min (p=0.006), ANOVA revealed no statistically significant
difference in systolic blood pressure between the groups across all time points.
Systolic blood pressure showed a significant difference between the mephentermine group
versus the phenylephrine group (p=0.013) and the norepinephrine group versus the
phenylephrine group (p=0.022) at four minutes post hoc Bonferroni. Except at 15 and 60
minutes (p=0.02 and p=0.001, Refer This Article Amit Pradhan, Rasulata Swain,
Priyadarsini Samanta, Laxman K Senapati, Ganesh C Satapathy, 2024. Comparison of
infusions of phenylephrine, norepinephrine, and Mephentermine on maternal hemodynamics
and neonatal outcomes in caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia. . Journal of
medical pharmaceutical and allied sciences, V 13 - I 1, Pages- 6392 – 6400. Doi:
https://doi.org/10.55522/jmpas.V13I1.5919.respectively), the mean heart rate was
comparable among the three groups. The Chi-square test revealed no statistically
significant difference in the requirement of rescue drugs among the groups (ϰ2=1.57,
p=0.45) except at the time point of 4 minutes (p=0.01) when the highest requirement was
observed in the phenylephrine group. The Apgar scores amongst the groups were comparable
at 1 min (p=0.99) and 5 min (p=0.98). In the lower segment caesarian section under the
subarachnoid block, infusions of phenylephrine, norepinephrine, and mephentermine were
equally effective in managing maternal hypotension and achieving favorable neonatal
outcomes.