GMM‐LIME explainable machine learning model for interpreting sensor‐based human gait

M. Mulwa, R. Mwangi, A. Mindila
{"title":"GMM‐LIME explainable machine learning model for interpreting sensor‐based human gait","authors":"M. Mulwa, R. Mwangi, A. Mindila","doi":"10.1002/eng2.12864","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Machine learning (ML) has been used in human gait data for appropriate assistive device prediction. However, their uptake in the medical setup still remains low due to their black box nature which restricts clinicians from understanding how they operate. This has led to the exploration of explainable ML. Studies have recommended local interpretable model‐agnostic explanation (LIME) because it builds sparse linear models around an individual prediction in its local vicinity hence fast and also because it could be used on any ML model. LIME is however, is not always stable. The research aimed to enhance LIME to attain stability by avoid the sampling step through combining Gaussian mixture model (GMM) sampling. To test performance of the GMM‐LIME, supervised ML were recommended because study revealed that their accuracy was above 90% when used on human gait. Neural networks were adopted for GaitRec dataset and Random Forest (RF) was adopted and applied on HugaDB datasets. Maximum accuracies attained were multilayer perceptron (95%) and RF (99%). Graphical results on stability and Jaccard similarity scores were presented for both original LIME and GMM‐LIME. Unlike original LIME, GMM‐LIME produced not only more accurate and reliable but also consistently stable explanations.","PeriodicalId":11735,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/eng2.12864","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Machine learning (ML) has been used in human gait data for appropriate assistive device prediction. However, their uptake in the medical setup still remains low due to their black box nature which restricts clinicians from understanding how they operate. This has led to the exploration of explainable ML. Studies have recommended local interpretable model‐agnostic explanation (LIME) because it builds sparse linear models around an individual prediction in its local vicinity hence fast and also because it could be used on any ML model. LIME is however, is not always stable. The research aimed to enhance LIME to attain stability by avoid the sampling step through combining Gaussian mixture model (GMM) sampling. To test performance of the GMM‐LIME, supervised ML were recommended because study revealed that their accuracy was above 90% when used on human gait. Neural networks were adopted for GaitRec dataset and Random Forest (RF) was adopted and applied on HugaDB datasets. Maximum accuracies attained were multilayer perceptron (95%) and RF (99%). Graphical results on stability and Jaccard similarity scores were presented for both original LIME and GMM‐LIME. Unlike original LIME, GMM‐LIME produced not only more accurate and reliable but also consistently stable explanations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于解释基于传感器的人体步态的 GMM-LIME 可解释机器学习模型
机器学习(ML)已被用于人类步态数据,以预测合适的辅助设备。然而,由于机器学习的黑箱性质,临床医生无法理解其运作方式,因此其在医疗领域的使用率仍然很低。因此,人们开始探索可解释的 ML。有研究推荐使用局部可解释模型-诊断性解释(LIME),因为它能在局部附近围绕单个预测建立稀疏线性模型,因此速度很快,还因为它可用于任何 ML 模型。然而,LIME 并不总是稳定的。这项研究旨在通过结合高斯混合模型(GMM)采样,避免采样步骤,从而增强 LIME 的稳定性。为了测试 GMM-LIME 的性能,建议使用有监督的 ML,因为研究表明,将其用于人类步态时,准确率在 90% 以上。GaitRec 数据集采用神经网络,HugaDB 数据集采用随机森林(RF)。获得最高准确率的是多层感知器(95%)和 RF(99%)。原始 LIME 和 GMM-LIME 的稳定性和 Jaccard 相似度得分均以图表形式显示。与原始 LIME 不同的是,GMM-LIME 提出的解释不仅更准确、更可靠,而且也更稳定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An AI based cross‐language aspect‐level sentiment analysis model using English corpus Development and characterization of in‐situ nickel aluminide reinforced Al‐Si matrix composites by stir casting Evaluating ground vibration attenuation through leca‐filled trenches: A support vector machine approach Performance of dual‐chamber oscillating water column device under irregular incident waves using Reynolds averaged Navier–Stokes model Performance of multilayered porous breakwater under irregular waves having different wave spectrum
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1