Mapping Actionable Gaps in Patient Journey for Depression in the United Arab Emirates: A Strategic Framework

Samer Makhoul, Osama Ali, Nahida Nayaz Ahmed, Urooj Siddiqui, Amina Cherchali
{"title":"Mapping Actionable Gaps in Patient Journey for Depression in the United Arab\nEmirates: A Strategic Framework","authors":"Samer Makhoul, Osama Ali, Nahida Nayaz Ahmed, Urooj Siddiqui, Amina Cherchali","doi":"10.2174/0102506882271385240119144550","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nDepression is on a steady rise across the United Arab Emirates (UAE), causing much socio-economic burden to the country. Identifying patient\njourney gaps for depression, beginning with awareness and screening, diagnosis, and treatment to sustained remission and rehabilitation, can help\ndesign health policies with actionable solutions, mitigating the burden of the disease.\n\n\n\nStudies in the English language between 2010 and 2021 were shortlisted using a structured search in electronic databases followed by an\nunstructured search using government websites and Google Scholar and anecdotal data from local professional experts. Synthesized data was\nsubjected to weighted mean calculation, and an evidence gap map was charted.\n\n\n\nVarying prevalence of depression (5.1%–82.2%) was reported across different settings and population sample sizes in the UAE. One study\nreported that 13.0% of the UAE population was aware of their depressive condition. Screening rates of depression were reported to be relatively\nhigh (34.2%–90.5%), while depression was diagnosed in 0.5%–48.5% of patients. The treatment rate was 36.1%, while adherence rates were\nestimated to be low at 0.3%. No evidence of control or remission of depression could be gathered.\nThe reviewed studies used only the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) diagnostic criteria for diagnosing depression.\nThe review also lacked large-scale research studies that may have limited the actual representation of the prevalence of depression across the\ncountry.\n\n\n\nAddressing the gaps identified through evidence mapping methodology can shape a ‘model of care’ for depression. This model should aim to\nharmonize collaborations among the mental health stakeholders and advocate for the social reintegration of patients.\n","PeriodicalId":508641,"journal":{"name":"New Emirates Medical Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Emirates Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0102506882271385240119144550","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Depression is on a steady rise across the United Arab Emirates (UAE), causing much socio-economic burden to the country. Identifying patient journey gaps for depression, beginning with awareness and screening, diagnosis, and treatment to sustained remission and rehabilitation, can help design health policies with actionable solutions, mitigating the burden of the disease. Studies in the English language between 2010 and 2021 were shortlisted using a structured search in electronic databases followed by an unstructured search using government websites and Google Scholar and anecdotal data from local professional experts. Synthesized data was subjected to weighted mean calculation, and an evidence gap map was charted. Varying prevalence of depression (5.1%–82.2%) was reported across different settings and population sample sizes in the UAE. One study reported that 13.0% of the UAE population was aware of their depressive condition. Screening rates of depression were reported to be relatively high (34.2%–90.5%), while depression was diagnosed in 0.5%–48.5% of patients. The treatment rate was 36.1%, while adherence rates were estimated to be low at 0.3%. No evidence of control or remission of depression could be gathered. The reviewed studies used only the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) diagnostic criteria for diagnosing depression. The review also lacked large-scale research studies that may have limited the actual representation of the prevalence of depression across the country. Addressing the gaps identified through evidence mapping methodology can shape a ‘model of care’ for depression. This model should aim to harmonize collaborations among the mental health stakeholders and advocate for the social reintegration of patients.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
绘制阿拉伯联合酋长国抑郁症患者旅程中可操作的差距:战略框架
抑郁症在整个阿拉伯联合酋长国(UAE)呈稳步上升趋势,给国家造成了沉重的社会经济负担。通过在电子数据库中进行结构化搜索,然后利用政府网站和谷歌学术进行非结构化搜索,并从当地专业专家那里获得轶事数据,最终筛选出 2010 年至 2021 年期间的英文研究。在阿联酋不同的环境和人群样本中,抑郁症的患病率(5.1%-82.2%)各不相同。一项研究报告称,13.0% 的阿联酋人知道自己患有抑郁症。据报道,抑郁症的筛查率相对较高(34.2%-90.5%),0.5%-48.5%的患者被诊断为抑郁症。治疗率为 36.1%,而坚持治疗率估计较低,仅为 0.3%。综述研究仅使用《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》(DSM)的诊断标准来诊断抑郁症。综述还缺乏大规模的研究,这可能限制了抑郁症在全国范围内流行的实际代表性。这种模式应旨在协调心理健康利益相关者之间的合作,并倡导患者重新融入社会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Prevalence of Nosocomial Infections and the Pattern of Microbial Resistance in a Tertiary Care Referral Hospital (Alzahra), Isfahan, Iran Primary Pulmonary Choriocarcinoma and Caesarean Section Ectopic Pregnancy: A Case Report with an Emergency Department Diagnostic Pathway Visceral Fat-associated Adipokines and Metabolic Variables in Central Obese Type 2 Diabetic Patients The Effect of Personality Traits of Healthcare Worker Candidates on their Attitudes Towards the Elderly A Study of Dermatoglyphics Patterns in Relation to the Levels of Perceived Stress
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1