Ultrasound assessment of blood flow in the median nerve in normal conditions and in carpal tunnel syndrome

A. V. Baitinger, S. V. Fomina, V. Baitinger, Yu. V. Magay
{"title":"Ultrasound assessment of blood flow in the median nerve in normal conditions and in carpal tunnel syndrome","authors":"A. V. Baitinger, S. V. Fomina, V. Baitinger, Yu. V. Magay","doi":"10.33920/med-01-2402-08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Carpal tunnel syndrome is the most common compressive neuropathy of the upper extremity, which manifests with painful paresthesia in the fingers and impaired hand function. The ultrasound method is successfully used to diagnose this disease. The ultrasound criterion for carpal tunnel syndrome is swelling of the median ner ve, which is a manifestation of poor circulation in the nerve. The study involved 29 people (56 limbs), divided into 2 groups: group 1 — healthy volunteers (14 people, image processing. In group 1, the intraneural type of blood flow was found in 75 % of cases, paraneural — in 3.6 %, and the blood flow was not determined in 21.4 %. In group 2, in 78.6 % of cases there was an intraneural type of blood flow, in 7.1 % — paraneural, and in 14.3 % the blood flow was not determined. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups. In the group of the patients, the area averaged at 15,350 px2, which is statistically significantly higher than the area of the median ner ve in the group of the volunteers, where this figure averaged at 6,665 px2. The average cross-sectional area of the visualized vessels of the median nerve in the group of the patients was 226 px 2, and in the group of healthy volunteers — 101.025 px2. The blood flow area in the patients was statistically significantly higher than in the volunteers, and the blood flow velocity was 5 cm/sec on average, which is statistically significantly higher than in the control group, where this figure averaged at 3 cm/sec. The type of blood supply to the median nerve does not affect the development of carpal tunnel syndrome and does not determine its origin. Analysis of blood flow velocity may be an important predictor of treatment success in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome.","PeriodicalId":447580,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik nevrologii, psihiatrii i nejrohirurgii (Bulletin of Neurology, Psychiatry and Neurosurgery)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik nevrologii, psihiatrii i nejrohirurgii (Bulletin of Neurology, Psychiatry and Neurosurgery)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33920/med-01-2402-08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Carpal tunnel syndrome is the most common compressive neuropathy of the upper extremity, which manifests with painful paresthesia in the fingers and impaired hand function. The ultrasound method is successfully used to diagnose this disease. The ultrasound criterion for carpal tunnel syndrome is swelling of the median ner ve, which is a manifestation of poor circulation in the nerve. The study involved 29 people (56 limbs), divided into 2 groups: group 1 — healthy volunteers (14 people, image processing. In group 1, the intraneural type of blood flow was found in 75 % of cases, paraneural — in 3.6 %, and the blood flow was not determined in 21.4 %. In group 2, in 78.6 % of cases there was an intraneural type of blood flow, in 7.1 % — paraneural, and in 14.3 % the blood flow was not determined. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups. In the group of the patients, the area averaged at 15,350 px2, which is statistically significantly higher than the area of the median ner ve in the group of the volunteers, where this figure averaged at 6,665 px2. The average cross-sectional area of the visualized vessels of the median nerve in the group of the patients was 226 px 2, and in the group of healthy volunteers — 101.025 px2. The blood flow area in the patients was statistically significantly higher than in the volunteers, and the blood flow velocity was 5 cm/sec on average, which is statistically significantly higher than in the control group, where this figure averaged at 3 cm/sec. The type of blood supply to the median nerve does not affect the development of carpal tunnel syndrome and does not determine its origin. Analysis of blood flow velocity may be an important predictor of treatment success in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
正常情况下和腕管综合征中正中神经血流的超声评估
腕管综合征是上肢最常见的压迫性神经病,表现为手指疼痛麻痹和手部功能受损。超声波法被成功用于诊断这种疾病。腕管综合征的超声标准是正中神经静脉肿胀,这是神经血液循环不良的表现。研究涉及 29 人(56 肢),分为 2 组:第 1 组--健康志愿者(14 人,图像处理。在第 1 组中,75% 的病例发现了神经内血流类型,3.6% 的病例发现了神经旁血流类型,21.4% 的病例未确定血流类型。在第 2 组中,78.6% 的病例有硬膜内血流,7.1% 的病例有硬膜旁血流,14.3% 的病例血流未确定。各组之间没有明显的统计学差异。患者组的平均面积为 15,350 px2,在统计学上明显高于志愿者组的中位 ner ve 面积,后者的平均面积为 6,665 px2。患者组正中神经可视血管的平均横截面积为 226 px 2,而健康志愿者组为 101.025 px2。患者的血流面积在统计学上明显高于志愿者,血流速度平均为 5 厘米/秒,在统计学上明显高于对照组,对照组的平均值为 3 厘米/秒。正中神经的供血类型不会影响腕管综合征的发生,也不能决定其起源。对血流速度的分析可能是预测腕管综合征患者治疗成功与否的一个重要指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Etiology and pathogenesis of mental disorders in patients with multiple sclerosis: anxiety, psychotic, and personality disorders, chemical addictions, pathological affect Neurosurgical approach to the treatment of otorhinogenic brain abscess (a clinical case) Role of neurotrophic growth factors in vincristine polyneuropathy in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia Ultrasound assessment of blood flow in the median nerve in normal conditions and in carpal tunnel syndrome A correlation between anxiety-depressive symptoms and immune-metabolic parameters in patients with mixed anxiety and depressive disorder
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1