Beatriz Fogolari-Boteon, Rafaela Oliva-da Silva, Bruna Ferrari-Schedenffeldt, Henrique Spricigo, Andreia Cristina Silva-Hirata, P. A. Monquero
{"title":"CROP SENSITIVITY TO DICAMBA AND 2,4-D APPLIED AT COMMERCIAL AND SUBDOSE LEVELS","authors":"Beatriz Fogolari-Boteon, Rafaela Oliva-da Silva, Bruna Ferrari-Schedenffeldt, Henrique Spricigo, Andreia Cristina Silva-Hirata, P. A. Monquero","doi":"10.47163/agrociencia.v58i2.3015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The development of dicamba and 2,4-D resistant crops may result in the widespread use of these herbicides in agricultural areas, potentially affecting nearby susceptible crops. This study aimed to evaluate the sensitivity of bean, peanut, and cotton to different doses of Dicamba and 2,4-D. To do so, separate experiments were conducted for each crop and herbicide in a greenhouse, using a completely randomized design with four replications. Both herbicides were applied at different doses to plants with the second pair of true leaves. Phytotoxicity and dry biomass were evaluated. For cotton, 2,4-D showed high phytotoxicity at doses of up to 83.75 g ai ha−1, with a reduction in suppressive effect observed at 20.93 g ai ha−1. Dicamba exhibited a pronounced reduction in crop biomass up to a dose of 70 g ai ha−1, with 94 % phytotoxicity. For beans, the evolution of symptoms using 2,4-D occurred more slowly, but the highest doses resulted in phytotoxicity of up to 95 % and a 30 % reduction in biomass at 167.5 g ai ha−1, indicating a significant impact on the crop. Dicamba also had a high negative impact, with a 100 % reduction in biomass at 70 g ai ha−1. The peanut crop was more tolerant to herbicides, with 2,4-D doses of 670, 335, and 167.5 g ai ha−1 resulting in phytotoxicities of 69.5, 37.49, and 14.37 %, respectively. Dicamba significantly reduced dry biomass at doses of up to 70 g ai ha−1. The results show that, despite the differences in sensitivity of cotton, bean, and peanut to 2,4-D and Dicamba, even low doses of these herbicides applied early in development had a significant negative impact on these crops.","PeriodicalId":502562,"journal":{"name":"Agrociencia","volume":"20 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agrociencia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47163/agrociencia.v58i2.3015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The development of dicamba and 2,4-D resistant crops may result in the widespread use of these herbicides in agricultural areas, potentially affecting nearby susceptible crops. This study aimed to evaluate the sensitivity of bean, peanut, and cotton to different doses of Dicamba and 2,4-D. To do so, separate experiments were conducted for each crop and herbicide in a greenhouse, using a completely randomized design with four replications. Both herbicides were applied at different doses to plants with the second pair of true leaves. Phytotoxicity and dry biomass were evaluated. For cotton, 2,4-D showed high phytotoxicity at doses of up to 83.75 g ai ha−1, with a reduction in suppressive effect observed at 20.93 g ai ha−1. Dicamba exhibited a pronounced reduction in crop biomass up to a dose of 70 g ai ha−1, with 94 % phytotoxicity. For beans, the evolution of symptoms using 2,4-D occurred more slowly, but the highest doses resulted in phytotoxicity of up to 95 % and a 30 % reduction in biomass at 167.5 g ai ha−1, indicating a significant impact on the crop. Dicamba also had a high negative impact, with a 100 % reduction in biomass at 70 g ai ha−1. The peanut crop was more tolerant to herbicides, with 2,4-D doses of 670, 335, and 167.5 g ai ha−1 resulting in phytotoxicities of 69.5, 37.49, and 14.37 %, respectively. Dicamba significantly reduced dry biomass at doses of up to 70 g ai ha−1. The results show that, despite the differences in sensitivity of cotton, bean, and peanut to 2,4-D and Dicamba, even low doses of these herbicides applied early in development had a significant negative impact on these crops.
麦草畏和 2,4-D 抗性作物的发展可能会导致这些除草剂在农业区的广泛使用,从而可能影响附近的易感作物。本研究旨在评估豆类、花生和棉花对不同剂量麦草畏和 2,4-D 的敏感性。为此,在温室中对每种作物和除草剂分别进行了实验,采用完全随机设计,四次重复。两种除草剂都以不同的剂量施用于长出第二对真叶的植株。对植物毒性和干生物量进行了评估。对棉花而言,2,4-D 在高达 83.75 g ai ha-1 的剂量下显示出较高的植物毒性,在 20.93 g ai ha-1 的剂量下,抑制作用有所减弱。麦草畏在 70 g ai ha-1 的剂量下会明显减少作物生物量,植物毒性为 94%。对豆类来说,使用 2,4-D 出现症状的速度较慢,但最高剂量的植物毒性高达 95%,生物量在 167.5 g ai ha-1 时减少 30%,表明对作物的影响很大。麦草畏的负面影响也很大,70 g ai ha-1 时生物量减少 100%。花生作物对除草剂的耐受性较强,2,4-D 剂量为 670、335 和 167.5 g ai ha-1 时,植物毒性分别为 69.5%、37.49% 和 14.37%。麦草畏在剂量高达 70 g ai ha-1 时会明显减少干生物量。结果表明,尽管棉花、豆类和花生对 2,4-D 和麦草畏的敏感性不同,但即使在生长早期施用低剂量的这些除草剂,也会对这些作物产生明显的负面影响。