Platformisation of Science

Benedikt Fecher, Raffaela Kunz, N. Sokolovska, Marcel Wrzesinski
{"title":"Platformisation of Science","authors":"Benedikt Fecher, Raffaela Kunz, N. Sokolovska, Marcel Wrzesinski","doi":"10.53377/lq.16693","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The digital platforms we are dealing with in this article are auxiliary tools that do not produce anything themselves but provide an infrastructure for service providers and users to meet. They have potentially unlimited scaling potential and have become the central places of exchange. In academia we can also observe that research and its communication becomes more digital  and that digital services are aiming to become platforms. In this article we explore the concept of digital platforms and their potential impact on academic research, firstly addressing the question: To what extent can digital platforms be understood as a specific type of research infrastructure? We draw from recent literature on platforms and platformisation from different streams of scholarship and relate them to the science studies concept of research infrastructures, to eventually arrive at a framework for science platforms. Secondly, we aim to assess how science platforms may affect scholarly practice. To this end, we relate common platform practices to scientific practice. Thirdly, we aim to assess to what extent science is platformized and how this interferes with scientific understandings of quality and autonomy. In the end of this article, we argue that the potential benefits of platform infrastructure for academic pursuits cannot be ignored, but the commercialization of the infrastructure for scholarly communication is a cause for concern. Ultimately, a nuanced and well-informed perspective on the impact of platformisation on academia is necessary to ensure that the academic community can maximize the benefits of digital infrastructures while mitigating negative consequences.","PeriodicalId":503036,"journal":{"name":"LIBER Quarterly: The Journal of the Association of European Research Libraries","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LIBER Quarterly: The Journal of the Association of European Research Libraries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53377/lq.16693","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The digital platforms we are dealing with in this article are auxiliary tools that do not produce anything themselves but provide an infrastructure for service providers and users to meet. They have potentially unlimited scaling potential and have become the central places of exchange. In academia we can also observe that research and its communication becomes more digital  and that digital services are aiming to become platforms. In this article we explore the concept of digital platforms and their potential impact on academic research, firstly addressing the question: To what extent can digital platforms be understood as a specific type of research infrastructure? We draw from recent literature on platforms and platformisation from different streams of scholarship and relate them to the science studies concept of research infrastructures, to eventually arrive at a framework for science platforms. Secondly, we aim to assess how science platforms may affect scholarly practice. To this end, we relate common platform practices to scientific practice. Thirdly, we aim to assess to what extent science is platformized and how this interferes with scientific understandings of quality and autonomy. In the end of this article, we argue that the potential benefits of platform infrastructure for academic pursuits cannot be ignored, but the commercialization of the infrastructure for scholarly communication is a cause for concern. Ultimately, a nuanced and well-informed perspective on the impact of platformisation on academia is necessary to ensure that the academic community can maximize the benefits of digital infrastructures while mitigating negative consequences.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
科学平台化
我们在本文中讨论的数字平台是一种辅助工具,其本身并不生产任何东西,但为服务提供商和用户提供了会面的基础设施。它们具有潜在的无限扩展潜力,并已成为交流的中心场所。在学术界,我们也可以看到,研究及其交流变得越来越数字化,数字化服务的目标是成为平台。在本文中,我们将探讨数字平台的概念及其对学术研究的潜在影响,首先解决以下问题:数字平台在多大程度上可以被理解为一种特定类型的研究基础设施?我们借鉴了近期不同学术流派关于平台和平台化的文献,并将其与研究基础设施的科学研究概念联系起来,最终形成了科学平台的框架。其次,我们旨在评估科学平台如何影响学术实践。为此,我们将常见的平台实践与科学实践联系起来。第三,我们旨在评估科学在多大程度上实现了平台化,以及这在多大程度上干扰了科学对质量和自主性的理解。在本文的最后,我们认为平台基础设施对学术追求的潜在益处不容忽视,但学术交流基础设施的商业化令人担忧。归根结底,要确保学术界能够最大限度地利用数字基础设施的益处,同时减少负面影响,就必须对平台化对学术界的影响有一个细致入微、充分了解的视角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Platformisation of Science Establishing a library as an Open Science partner for economic research through impact-oriented public relations work
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1