{"title":"A Study of Blood Viscosity and Inflammatory Biomarkers’ Levels in Bilateral Primary Varicose Veins/Reticular Veins as Predictive Markers","authors":"Mukul Urvendra Dahiya, Sanjay Singh, Saurabh Singh, Santosh Kumar Singh, Varsha Kumar","doi":"10.25259/ijrsms_4_2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nCross-sectional data was collected for a period of 1 year to assess the biomarkers of inflammation, and blood viscosity as predictive markers in patients with primary bilateral varicose veins or reticular veins that might progress to varicose veins.\n\n\n\nA sample of 40 participants, 20 controls and 20 patients aged 18–65 years falling under the reticular veins and symptomatic varicose veins (C1, 2s), primary etiology (Ep), superficial veins (As), reflux pathology (Pr) categories of Clinical, etiologic, anatomic, Pathophysiologic (CEAP) classification with the exception of telangiectatic veins, were included in the study. Blood viscosity was measured using a Capillary Viscometer. Evaluated inflammatory markers were tissue Plasminogen Activator (tPA), Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor-1 (PAI-1), and fibrinogen. Analysis was done using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software and Chi-square, Fisher’s, Bonferroni, and Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) tests were applied.\n\n\n\nThere was a statistically insignificant relationship between occupation and different study groups. Standing hours and serum fibrinogen levels had a significant difference in different study groups. Serum tPA, Serum PAI-1, and blood viscosity had an insignificant difference between different study groups. It was revealed that the pairwise group comparisons of study group C2 vs. control group C0, study group C1 vs. control group C0 and study group C2 vs. study group C1, and study group C2 vs. control group C0 each were significantly different pairwise.\n\n\n\nBlood viscosity, tPA and PAI-1 cannot be used as predictive markers in patients with bilateral (B/L) primary varicose veins/reticular veins. Serum fibrinogen levels can be used as predictive markers for the development of B/L primary varicose veins and in our particular study with a predictive range of 189.4–327.9 mg/dL but not for B/L reticular veins. Prolonged standing, irrespective of the occupation of the patient, is associated with the development of B/L reticular veins and B/L varicose veins.\n","PeriodicalId":34302,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Recent Surgical and Medical Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Recent Surgical and Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/ijrsms_4_2023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Cross-sectional data was collected for a period of 1 year to assess the biomarkers of inflammation, and blood viscosity as predictive markers in patients with primary bilateral varicose veins or reticular veins that might progress to varicose veins.
A sample of 40 participants, 20 controls and 20 patients aged 18–65 years falling under the reticular veins and symptomatic varicose veins (C1, 2s), primary etiology (Ep), superficial veins (As), reflux pathology (Pr) categories of Clinical, etiologic, anatomic, Pathophysiologic (CEAP) classification with the exception of telangiectatic veins, were included in the study. Blood viscosity was measured using a Capillary Viscometer. Evaluated inflammatory markers were tissue Plasminogen Activator (tPA), Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor-1 (PAI-1), and fibrinogen. Analysis was done using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software and Chi-square, Fisher’s, Bonferroni, and Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) tests were applied.
There was a statistically insignificant relationship between occupation and different study groups. Standing hours and serum fibrinogen levels had a significant difference in different study groups. Serum tPA, Serum PAI-1, and blood viscosity had an insignificant difference between different study groups. It was revealed that the pairwise group comparisons of study group C2 vs. control group C0, study group C1 vs. control group C0 and study group C2 vs. study group C1, and study group C2 vs. control group C0 each were significantly different pairwise.
Blood viscosity, tPA and PAI-1 cannot be used as predictive markers in patients with bilateral (B/L) primary varicose veins/reticular veins. Serum fibrinogen levels can be used as predictive markers for the development of B/L primary varicose veins and in our particular study with a predictive range of 189.4–327.9 mg/dL but not for B/L reticular veins. Prolonged standing, irrespective of the occupation of the patient, is associated with the development of B/L reticular veins and B/L varicose veins.