Effectiveness of Ultrasonography and Computed Tomography in the Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis

Mehmet Gümer, Fırat Erkmen, Emre Karaca, Reşit Çi̇ftçi̇
{"title":"Effectiveness of Ultrasonography and Computed Tomography in the Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis","authors":"Mehmet Gümer, Fırat Erkmen, Emre Karaca, Reşit Çi̇ftçi̇","doi":"10.35440/hutfd.1410081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Acute appendicitis is the acute inflammation of the appendix vermiformis and is one of the leading emergency intra-abdominal surgeries. In the study; To investigate the effectiveness of preoperative USG and CT in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.\nMaterials and Methods: The records of 332 patients who underwent appendectomy between March 2018 and March 2023 were retrospectively examined. Gender, age, USG and CT reports and patho-logy results of the patients were recorded. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive values of USG and CT in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis were calculated separately.\nResults: The pathology result was reported as acute appendicitis in 312 of the patients, and was evaluated as normal in 20 of them. The pathology result of 254 of 261 patients, whose CT results were evaluated as compatible with acute appendicitis, was reported as acute appendicitis. In 7 patients, it was found to be normal appendicitis. Of 28 patients whose CT results were incompatible with acute appendicitis, the pathology result was positive in 18 and negative in 10. Pathology results of 96 patients whose USG results were compatible with acute appendicitis; Acute appendicitis was found in 90 patients and normal appendix in 6 patients. Pathology results of 41 patients whose USG results were evaluated as negative; It was reported to be compatible with acute appendicitis in 36 cases and normal in 5 cases.\nConclusions: In our study, both the sensitivity and specificity of CT were found to be superior to USG, consistent with the literature. Researching IT effectiveness; We think that prospective studies com-paring teleradiology reports and the reports of radiologists working in hospitals would be useful.","PeriodicalId":502461,"journal":{"name":"Harran Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi","volume":"12 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Harran Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35440/hutfd.1410081","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Acute appendicitis is the acute inflammation of the appendix vermiformis and is one of the leading emergency intra-abdominal surgeries. In the study; To investigate the effectiveness of preoperative USG and CT in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Materials and Methods: The records of 332 patients who underwent appendectomy between March 2018 and March 2023 were retrospectively examined. Gender, age, USG and CT reports and patho-logy results of the patients were recorded. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive values of USG and CT in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis were calculated separately. Results: The pathology result was reported as acute appendicitis in 312 of the patients, and was evaluated as normal in 20 of them. The pathology result of 254 of 261 patients, whose CT results were evaluated as compatible with acute appendicitis, was reported as acute appendicitis. In 7 patients, it was found to be normal appendicitis. Of 28 patients whose CT results were incompatible with acute appendicitis, the pathology result was positive in 18 and negative in 10. Pathology results of 96 patients whose USG results were compatible with acute appendicitis; Acute appendicitis was found in 90 patients and normal appendix in 6 patients. Pathology results of 41 patients whose USG results were evaluated as negative; It was reported to be compatible with acute appendicitis in 36 cases and normal in 5 cases. Conclusions: In our study, both the sensitivity and specificity of CT were found to be superior to USG, consistent with the literature. Researching IT effectiveness; We think that prospective studies com-paring teleradiology reports and the reports of radiologists working in hospitals would be useful.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超声波和计算机断层扫描在诊断急性阑尾炎中的有效性
背景:急性阑尾炎是阑尾蚓部的急性炎症,是主要的急腹症手术之一。本研究旨在探讨术前 USG 和 CT 在诊断急性阑尾炎中的有效性:回顾性研究2018年3月至2023年3月期间接受阑尾切除术的332例患者的病历。记录了患者的性别、年龄、USG 和 CT 报告以及病理结果。分别计算了 USG 和 CT 诊断急性阑尾炎的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值:结果:312 名患者的病理结果显示为急性阑尾炎,20 名患者的病理结果为正常。261 名患者中有 254 人的 CT 结果被评估为与急性阑尾炎相符,其病理结果被报告为急性阑尾炎。7 名患者的病理结果为正常阑尾炎。在 CT 结果与急性阑尾炎不符的 28 名患者中,病理结果呈阳性的有 18 人,呈阴性的有 10 人。96 例 USG 结果与急性阑尾炎相符的患者的病理结果;90 例患者发现急性阑尾炎,6 例患者发现阑尾正常。41 例 USG 结果为阴性的患者的病理结果显示,36 例符合急性阑尾炎,5 例正常:我们的研究发现,CT 的敏感性和特异性均优于 USG,这与文献报道一致。我们认为,将远程放射学报告与医院放射科医生的报告进行比较的前瞻性研究将非常有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Mediating Role of Resilience in the Relationship between Social Exclusion and Sleep Parameters in Refugee Children Gaziantep İlindeki Hepatit A Seroprevalansı ve Endemik Değişim Evaluation of the Relationship between Total Vertebral Artery Flow and Quality of Life in Patients with Vertebrobasilar Insufficiency The Association Between Systemic Immune Inflammation Index and Intermediate-Term Mortality in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes Şanlıurfa’da Karşılanmamış Aile Planlaması İhtiyacı ve Nedenlerinin Belirlenmesi
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1