Exploring undergraduate clinical students’ perspectives on interprofessional education

Abd Hamid Nur Zainie, Muzaini Azlina, Rashed@Mohamed Abd Ghani
{"title":"Exploring undergraduate clinical students’ perspectives on interprofessional education","authors":"Abd Hamid Nur Zainie, Muzaini Azlina, Rashed@Mohamed Abd Ghani","doi":"10.24191/ji.v19i1.24562","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Interprofessional Education (IPE) has been advocated to prepare future healthcare professionals for collaborative practice to improve the quality of patient care and overall health outcomes. The problem statement revolves around the need to bridge the gap between the traditional, silos education of healthcare disciplines and the demands of a modern healthcare ecosystem. Insufficient IPE can result in fragmented patient care, communication breakdowns and suboptimal outcomes. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the perceptions of undergraduate clinical students from Malaysian higher institutions about Interprofessional Education (IPE). This study was conducted among undergraduate final-year students of clinical programs, including nursing, Medical, Nursing, Pharmacy and Health Sciences programs in selected private and public Malaysian higher institutions. The quantitative data was analysed via descriptive statistics using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS). Overall, the study received 288 responses from four public institutions and 3 private institutions. About 94.4% (272) of respondents claimed perceived needs for IPE. Most students agreed that patient care and critical patient care in general wards and community chronic patient care should be included in the content of IPE. More than 80% of the respondents agreed collaboration and teamwork, mutual understanding for other disciplines/professionals, conflict control and effective communication are the essential skills to be learned by IPE. The three most wanted IPE learning methods are lecture and discussion, clinical rotation, and role-playing. This study revealed differences in needs and perceptions regarding IPE between programs. This finding warrants further research to design appropriate IPE program goals and strategies that suit specific students' needs.","PeriodicalId":153855,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Intelek","volume":"161 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Intelek","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24191/ji.v19i1.24562","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Interprofessional Education (IPE) has been advocated to prepare future healthcare professionals for collaborative practice to improve the quality of patient care and overall health outcomes. The problem statement revolves around the need to bridge the gap between the traditional, silos education of healthcare disciplines and the demands of a modern healthcare ecosystem. Insufficient IPE can result in fragmented patient care, communication breakdowns and suboptimal outcomes. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the perceptions of undergraduate clinical students from Malaysian higher institutions about Interprofessional Education (IPE). This study was conducted among undergraduate final-year students of clinical programs, including nursing, Medical, Nursing, Pharmacy and Health Sciences programs in selected private and public Malaysian higher institutions. The quantitative data was analysed via descriptive statistics using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS). Overall, the study received 288 responses from four public institutions and 3 private institutions. About 94.4% (272) of respondents claimed perceived needs for IPE. Most students agreed that patient care and critical patient care in general wards and community chronic patient care should be included in the content of IPE. More than 80% of the respondents agreed collaboration and teamwork, mutual understanding for other disciplines/professionals, conflict control and effective communication are the essential skills to be learned by IPE. The three most wanted IPE learning methods are lecture and discussion, clinical rotation, and role-playing. This study revealed differences in needs and perceptions regarding IPE between programs. This finding warrants further research to design appropriate IPE program goals and strategies that suit specific students' needs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探讨临床专业本科生对跨专业教育的看法
跨专业教育(IPE)旨在培养未来的医疗保健专业人员进行合作实践,从而提高病人护理质量和整体健康水平。问题陈述围绕着需要弥合传统的、孤立的医疗保健学科教育与现代医疗保健生态系统需求之间的差距。IPE 不足会导致病人护理分散、沟通中断和疗效不佳。因此,本研究旨在调查马来西亚高等院校临床专业本科生对跨专业教育(IPE)的看法。这项研究的对象是马来西亚部分私立和公立高等院校临床专业(包括护理、医学、护理学、药学和健康科学专业)的本科应届生。定量数据通过社会科学统计软件包(SPSS)进行描述性统计分析。研究共收到来自 4 所公立院校和 3 所私立院校的 288 份回复。约 94.4%(272 人)的受访者认为自己需要 IPE。大多数学生同意,应将普通病房的病人护理和危重病人护理以及社区慢性病人护理纳入 IPE 的内容。超过 80% 的受访者认为,协作和团队精神、对其他学科/专业的相互理解、冲突控制和有效沟通是 IPE 需要学习的基本技能。最受欢迎的三种 IPE 学习方法是讲座和讨论、临床轮转和角色扮演。这项研究揭示了不同课程之间对 IPE 的需求和看法的差异。这一发现需要进一步研究,以设计出适合特定学生需求的 IPE 课程目标和策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The effect of 6-week different resistance training on shooting performance among elite archers A case study of Waqf Institutions: reasons for not implementing crowdfunding Redefining Malaysia's printing landscape: insights from Porter's CAN Model The effects of foam rolling vs massage as recovery tools among UiTM Perlis FC footballers Assessing the level of physical activity among UiTM Perlis students
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1