Application of the multi-criteria analysis method mairca, spotis, comet for the optimisation of sustainable electricity technology development

Ngoc-Tien Tran
{"title":"Application of the multi-criteria analysis method mairca, spotis, comet for the optimisation of sustainable electricity technology development","authors":"Ngoc-Tien Tran","doi":"10.21303/2461-4262.2024.003133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The development of sustainable electricity technology is of utmost importance in addressing the increasing energy demand while mitigating greenhouse gas emissions. Fossil fuel-based electricity generation is the primary contributor to air pollution and climate change, necessitating a shift towards renewable energy sources. The efficient production, distribution, and utilization of energy resources, along with ensuring affordable energy access and environmental sustainability, are key policy objectives for any country's energy sector. However, assessing sustainable electricity technologies is a complex task due to the diverse range of evaluation criteria and impacts associated with the practical implementation of these solutions. To overcome this challenge, this study proposes a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approach to select the optimal solution for the development of sustainable electricity technology. The study employs several reliable methods, including MAIRCA, SPOTIS, COMET, and the CRITIC weighting method, to perform ranking evaluations. Based on this, an evaluation Table of criteria using linguistic variables is constructed. Furthermore, a ranking of methods for developing sustainable electricity technology is established by combining MCDM optimization methods. The results indicate that future energy policies should prioritize sustainable energy technologies, particularly water and solar thermal solutions. These findings have significant implications for development policymakers as the transition towards a sustainable energy system becomes increasingly crucial. In the future, the findings of this research can be further developed on a regional level, enabling the identification of the most appropriate energy technologies for specific regions based on their unique characteristics and requirements","PeriodicalId":11804,"journal":{"name":"EUREKA: Physics and Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EUREKA: Physics and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21303/2461-4262.2024.003133","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The development of sustainable electricity technology is of utmost importance in addressing the increasing energy demand while mitigating greenhouse gas emissions. Fossil fuel-based electricity generation is the primary contributor to air pollution and climate change, necessitating a shift towards renewable energy sources. The efficient production, distribution, and utilization of energy resources, along with ensuring affordable energy access and environmental sustainability, are key policy objectives for any country's energy sector. However, assessing sustainable electricity technologies is a complex task due to the diverse range of evaluation criteria and impacts associated with the practical implementation of these solutions. To overcome this challenge, this study proposes a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approach to select the optimal solution for the development of sustainable electricity technology. The study employs several reliable methods, including MAIRCA, SPOTIS, COMET, and the CRITIC weighting method, to perform ranking evaluations. Based on this, an evaluation Table of criteria using linguistic variables is constructed. Furthermore, a ranking of methods for developing sustainable electricity technology is established by combining MCDM optimization methods. The results indicate that future energy policies should prioritize sustainable energy technologies, particularly water and solar thermal solutions. These findings have significant implications for development policymakers as the transition towards a sustainable energy system becomes increasingly crucial. In the future, the findings of this research can be further developed on a regional level, enabling the identification of the most appropriate energy technologies for specific regions based on their unique characteristics and requirements
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
应用多重标准分析方法 mairca、spotis 和 comet 优化可持续电力技术开发
开发可持续电力技术对于满足日益增长的能源需求并减少温室气体排放至关重要。化石燃料发电是造成空气污染和气候变化的主要因素,因此必须转向可再生能源。高效生产、分配和利用能源资源,同时确保可负担得起的能源供应和环境可持续性,是任何国家能源部门的关键政策目标。然而,评估可持续电力技术是一项复杂的任务,因为评估标准多种多样,而且与这些解决方案的实际实施相关的影响也多种多样。为了克服这一挑战,本研究提出了一种多标准决策(MCDM)方法,用于选择可持续电力技术发展的最佳解决方案。研究采用了几种可靠的方法,包括 MAIRCA、SPOTIS、COMET 和 CRITIC 加权法,来进行排序评估。在此基础上,利用语言变量构建了标准评价表。此外,还结合 MCDM 优化方法,建立了可持续电力技术发展方法的排序。结果表明,未来的能源政策应优先考虑可持续能源技术,特别是水和太阳能热解决方案。随着向可持续能源系统过渡变得越来越重要,这些发现对发展政策制定者具有重要意义。今后,可在地区层面进一步发展本研究成果,从而根据特定地区的独特特点和要求,为其确定最合适的能源技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
EUREKA: Physics and Engineering
EUREKA: Physics and Engineering Engineering-Engineering (all)
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
78
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Application of the multi-criteria analysis method mairca, spotis, comet for the optimisation of sustainable electricity technology development Investigation and establishment of rational geometric factors of die in the deep drawing without a blank holder A rheophysical study of the non-newtonian behavior of water flow in thin channels Study of the influence of the technical level of railway vehicles on braking characteristics The study of the efficiency evaluation of the ventilation system of the poultry house in the summer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1