War in Europe, but Still Low Tension in the High North? An Analysis of Norwegian Mitigation Strategies

Q1 Social Sciences Arctic Review on Law and Politics Pub Date : 2024-01-30 DOI:10.23865/arctic.v15.5065
B. Knutsen, Elisabeth Pettersen
{"title":"War in Europe, but Still Low Tension in the High North? An Analysis of Norwegian Mitigation Strategies","authors":"B. Knutsen, Elisabeth Pettersen","doi":"10.23865/arctic.v15.5065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has created the most precarious security situation in Europe, including the High North, since the Second World War. This article studies how Norway manages High North security dilemmas in the context of this ongoing war. Based on security dilemma theory, we direct our attention to a set of mitigation strategies and discuss the effectiveness of these. We build our arguments on Robert Jervis’ article “Cooperation under the Security Dilemma” in World Politics (1978), and his understanding that a security dilemma occurs when an increase in one state’s security leads to other states fearing for their own security, thus creating tension or conflict escalation. To limit such dilemmas, Norway has pursued a policy mix of both deterrence and reassurance measures. Our contribution to the research debate is the term mitigation-strategies, derived from security dilemma theory. First, we discuss people-to-people cooperation and analyse how this is a trust-building measure. Secondly, we explore how Norway approaches confidence and security building measures in the High North. Finally, we discuss the implications of letting the Arctic Council become an arena for security- and defence political coordination. Building upon insights from security dilemma theory, we demonstrate how Norway contributes to maintaining lower levels of tension in the High North.","PeriodicalId":36694,"journal":{"name":"Arctic Review on Law and Politics","volume":"34 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arctic Review on Law and Politics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23865/arctic.v15.5065","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has created the most precarious security situation in Europe, including the High North, since the Second World War. This article studies how Norway manages High North security dilemmas in the context of this ongoing war. Based on security dilemma theory, we direct our attention to a set of mitigation strategies and discuss the effectiveness of these. We build our arguments on Robert Jervis’ article “Cooperation under the Security Dilemma” in World Politics (1978), and his understanding that a security dilemma occurs when an increase in one state’s security leads to other states fearing for their own security, thus creating tension or conflict escalation. To limit such dilemmas, Norway has pursued a policy mix of both deterrence and reassurance measures. Our contribution to the research debate is the term mitigation-strategies, derived from security dilemma theory. First, we discuss people-to-people cooperation and analyse how this is a trust-building measure. Secondly, we explore how Norway approaches confidence and security building measures in the High North. Finally, we discuss the implications of letting the Arctic Council become an arena for security- and defence political coordination. Building upon insights from security dilemma theory, we demonstrate how Norway contributes to maintaining lower levels of tension in the High North.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧洲战火纷飞,北半球局势依然紧张?挪威缓解战略分析
俄罗斯对乌克兰的入侵造成了自第二次世界大战以来包括北部高地在内的欧洲最不稳定的安全局势。本文研究了挪威如何在这场持续不断的战争中应对北部高地的安全困境。在安全困境理论的基础上,我们提出了一系列缓解战略,并讨论了这些战略的有效性。我们的论点基于罗伯特-杰维斯(Robert Jervis)在《世界政治》(World Politics,1978 年)上发表的文章《安全困境下的合作》(Cooperation under the Security Dilemma),以及他对安全困境的理解:当一个国家的安全增加导致其他国家担心自己的安全,从而造成紧张局势或冲突升级时,就会出现安全困境。为了限制这种两难局面,挪威采取了威慑和安抚措施相结合的政策。我们对研究辩论的贡献在于从安全困境理论中引申出的 "缓解战略"(mitigation-strategies)一词。首先,我们讨论了人与人之间的合作,并分析了这是如何成为一项建立信任的措施。其次,我们探讨挪威如何在北部高地采取建立信任和安全措施。最后,我们讨论了让北极理事会成为安全与防务政治协调舞台的意义。根据安全困境理论的见解,我们说明了挪威是如何帮助维持北部高纬度地区较低水平的紧张局势的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Arctic Review on Law and Politics
Arctic Review on Law and Politics Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis of Residence Permit Appeals at the Administrative Courts of Finland: Acquiescence Bias by Legalised Judicial Injustices in Finland EU Engagement in the Arctic: Challenges to Achieving Ambitions in an Area outside Its Jurisdiction War in Europe, but Still Low Tension in the High North? An Analysis of Norwegian Mitigation Strategies Welcome to Another Demanding and Exiting Year Small States in World Politics: Norwegian Interests and Foreign Policy Challenges in the Arctic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1