Youth support for direct versus talk‐centric democratic processes in Finland

Janette Huttunen
{"title":"Youth support for direct versus talk‐centric democratic processes in Finland","authors":"Janette Huttunen","doi":"10.1111/1467-9477.12264","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Growing worries over young people's lack of engagement in institutionalized political processes have been appeased by theories of young people's political preferences for alternative, more engaged political activities. However, young people's institutionalized participation is important for the quality of participation. Democratic innovations, institutions that are designed to increase citizen participation, have been suggested as one solution to bring young people back into institutionalized politics. However, in research, different forms of democratic innovations are often treated as a bulk measure and not examined separately—depriving us of knowledge of youth support for different types of participatory processes. This paper contributes to the literature by examining youth support for a direct versus talk‐centric democratic process in Finland. The results indicate that young people support both referendums and discussion forums more than older people do and that discussion forums are more popular than referendums. Additionally, democratic satisfaction has a reversed effect on support for discussion forums for young and old people.","PeriodicalId":509462,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Political Studies","volume":"103 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Political Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9477.12264","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Growing worries over young people's lack of engagement in institutionalized political processes have been appeased by theories of young people's political preferences for alternative, more engaged political activities. However, young people's institutionalized participation is important for the quality of participation. Democratic innovations, institutions that are designed to increase citizen participation, have been suggested as one solution to bring young people back into institutionalized politics. However, in research, different forms of democratic innovations are often treated as a bulk measure and not examined separately—depriving us of knowledge of youth support for different types of participatory processes. This paper contributes to the literature by examining youth support for a direct versus talk‐centric democratic process in Finland. The results indicate that young people support both referendums and discussion forums more than older people do and that discussion forums are more popular than referendums. Additionally, democratic satisfaction has a reversed effect on support for discussion forums for young and old people.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
芬兰青年支持直接民主进程还是以谈话为中心的民主进程
人们对青年人缺乏参与制度化政治进程的担忧与日俱增,而青年人的政治偏好理论则安抚了他们的担忧,认为他们可以选择参与性更强的政治活动。然而,年轻人的制度化参与对参与质量非常重要。民主创新,即旨在提高公民参与度的制度,被认为是让年轻人重新参与制度化政治的一种解决方案。然而,在研究中,不同形式的民主创新往往被作为一个整体来对待,而不是分开研究,这使我们无法了解青年对不同类型参与进程的支持情况。本文通过研究芬兰青年对直接民主进程和以谈话为中心的民主进程的支持情况,为相关文献做出了贡献。结果表明,年轻人对全民公决和讨论论坛的支持率都高于老年人,而且讨论论坛比全民公决更受欢迎。此外,民主满意度对年轻人和老年人支持讨论论坛的影响是相反的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Home is where the heart is? A comparative analysis of Flemish and Danish parties' organizational linkages with the EU What is at stake and what does it take? Collaborative governance and policy (in)action in the adoption of a National Forest Programme The view of freedom that shaped the Swedish welfare state Party competition on social media: Evidence from politicians' tweets Interest group resources, access, and influence: An empirical review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1