An investigation on causes of delayed referral of patients with pleural empyema

Ali Biharas Monfared, F. S. Beigee, Niloufar Alizadeh, M. Dizaji, Parizad Sinaei
{"title":"An investigation on causes of delayed referral of patients with pleural empyema","authors":"Ali Biharas Monfared, F. S. Beigee, Niloufar Alizadeh, M. Dizaji, Parizad Sinaei","doi":"10.18502/ajs.v6i1.14713","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: In the treatment of pleural empyema, medical therapy is typically sufficient for the 1st or 2nd stage. However, surgical intervention becomes the optimal modality in the 3rd stage. A significant number of patients experience delayed diagnosis and treatment, leading to the conversion of non-surgical pleural empyema into complicated surgical empyema \nMethods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on patients with pleural empyema who were admitted to NRITLD in Tehran from 2015 to 2016. Initially, 66 patients were selected; however, after the exclusion of 12 patients, a total of 54 patients were included in the study \nResults: Delays were attributed to the medical system in 62% of cases and to the patient in 29% of cases. The median (IQR) of the total delay time attributed to the system was 38 (25) days. No significant difference was found in the median of delayed referrals between genders. A significant correlation was observed between the interval of the first and last visit and the interval between the onset of symptoms and chest x-ray (CXR), as well as the interval between the performance of CXR and the insertion of chest tube drainage (CTD). \nConclusions: The delay in referral and treatment can be attributed to the patient, practitioners, or both. In this study, it was found that the medical system is the primary cause of delay, primarily due to the long waiting times for admission and operation in hospitals. Patients who experience a delay in CXR and CTD insertion will face a significant delay in referral and their course of treatment. It is suggested that delayed referral could be prevented by providing patients with basic medical education, offering specialized training to general practitioners for early referral, and managing waiting lists effectively.","PeriodicalId":516777,"journal":{"name":"Academic Journal of Surgery","volume":"98 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/ajs.v6i1.14713","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In the treatment of pleural empyema, medical therapy is typically sufficient for the 1st or 2nd stage. However, surgical intervention becomes the optimal modality in the 3rd stage. A significant number of patients experience delayed diagnosis and treatment, leading to the conversion of non-surgical pleural empyema into complicated surgical empyema Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on patients with pleural empyema who were admitted to NRITLD in Tehran from 2015 to 2016. Initially, 66 patients were selected; however, after the exclusion of 12 patients, a total of 54 patients were included in the study Results: Delays were attributed to the medical system in 62% of cases and to the patient in 29% of cases. The median (IQR) of the total delay time attributed to the system was 38 (25) days. No significant difference was found in the median of delayed referrals between genders. A significant correlation was observed between the interval of the first and last visit and the interval between the onset of symptoms and chest x-ray (CXR), as well as the interval between the performance of CXR and the insertion of chest tube drainage (CTD). Conclusions: The delay in referral and treatment can be attributed to the patient, practitioners, or both. In this study, it was found that the medical system is the primary cause of delay, primarily due to the long waiting times for admission and operation in hospitals. Patients who experience a delay in CXR and CTD insertion will face a significant delay in referral and their course of treatment. It is suggested that delayed referral could be prevented by providing patients with basic medical education, offering specialized training to general practitioners for early referral, and managing waiting lists effectively.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于胸腔积液患者延迟转诊原因的调查
背景:在治疗胸腔积液时,药物疗法通常足以应付第一或第二阶段。然而,在第三阶段,手术干预成为最佳方式。大量患者因诊断和治疗延误,导致非手术治疗的胸膜腔积液转变为复杂的手术治疗的胸膜腔积液:对2015年至2016年德黑兰NRITLD收治的胸膜腔积液患者进行了横断面研究。最初选取了 66 名患者,但在排除了 12 名患者后,共有 54 名患者被纳入研究结果:62%的延误归因于医疗系统,29%的延误归因于患者。医疗系统造成的总延误时间的中位数(IQR)为 38(25)天。转诊延误时间的中位数在性别间没有明显差异。首次就诊和最后一次就诊的时间间隔与症状出现和胸部 X 光检查(CXR)之间的时间间隔以及胸部 X 光检查和插入胸管引流术(CTD)之间的时间间隔之间存在明显的相关性。结论转诊和治疗的延误可归因于患者、医生或两者。本研究发现,医疗系统是造成延误的主要原因,这主要是由于入院和手术的等待时间过长。如果患者在进行心肺功能检查和 CTD 插入手术时遇到延误,那么他们在转诊和治疗过程中将面临严重的延误。建议通过为患者提供基本医疗教育、为全科医生提供早期转诊的专门培训以及有效管理候诊名单来防止转诊延误。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparison of the efficacy Talc solution injection through Chest Tube and Talcum Powder through Pleuroscopy for the Treatment of Malignant Pleural Effusion: a randomized clinical trial An investigation on causes of delayed referral of patients with pleural empyema Unveiling the Hidden Peril: A Rare Case of Gossypiboma in an Elderly Woman Identifying the discriminative value of leukocytes, CRP and Procalcitonin serum level in detecting the anastomosis leakage after gastrointestinal surgery Comparing the outcomes of total thyroidectomy using a harmonic scalpel versus the conventional ligation techniques in Iran
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1