Comparative Study of Quality of Life After Surgery in Sigmoid and Rectal Cancers: A Single-Center Prospective Study

Anvar Elyasi, Mohammad Sadeq Najafi, Seyed Mohsen Ahmad Tafti, A. Kazemeini, S. M. Meshkati Yazd, M. Dashtkuhi, B. Behboudi, M. Fazeli, A. Keshvari, M. Keramati
{"title":"Comparative Study of Quality of Life After Surgery in Sigmoid and Rectal Cancers: A Single-Center Prospective Study","authors":"Anvar Elyasi, Mohammad Sadeq Najafi, Seyed Mohsen Ahmad Tafti, A. Kazemeini, S. M. Meshkati Yazd, M. Dashtkuhi, B. Behboudi, M. Fazeli, A. Keshvari, M. Keramati","doi":"10.18502/ajs.v6i1.14715","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Sigmoid and rectal cancers are common malignancies that necessitate surgical resection as the primary treatment modality. However, surgery can significantly impact the quality of life (QoL) of patients, particularly in terms of bowel function, sexual function, and psychological well-being. This study aimed to compare the QoL of patients who underwent surgery for sigmoid and rectal cancers \nMethods: A prospective study was conducted on 90 patients who underwent elective surgery for sigmoid or rectal cancer between January 2019 and December 2021 at the center. The QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CR29 questionnaires were utilized to assess the QoL of patients post-surgery. The QoL scores between the two groups were compared using t-tests and repeated measures ANOVA. \nResults: The average age of the patients was years, and 57.8% were females. The sigmoid group comprised 44 patients (48.8%) who underwent sigmoid colectomy, and the rectal group consisted of 46 patients (51.2%) who underwent low anterior resection. There were no significant differences in the baseline characteristics and QLQ-C30 scores between the two groups and also in other categories (sex, age groups, and cancer stages) (p > 0.05). However, a significant difference was observed between the QLQ-CR29 scores of the two surgical groups (p < 0.05). QLQ-CR29 was not significantly different between sex and age groups and cancer stages (p > 0.05). \nConclusions: The study demonstrated that surgery for sigmoid and rectal cancers deteriorated the QoL of patients, irrespective of the type of surgery or the location of the tumor. There was no significant difference in the QoL between the sigmoid and rectal groups measured by QLQ-C30. However, QLQ-CR29 showed significantly better QoL for the rectal group.","PeriodicalId":516777,"journal":{"name":"Academic Journal of Surgery","volume":"29 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/ajs.v6i1.14715","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Sigmoid and rectal cancers are common malignancies that necessitate surgical resection as the primary treatment modality. However, surgery can significantly impact the quality of life (QoL) of patients, particularly in terms of bowel function, sexual function, and psychological well-being. This study aimed to compare the QoL of patients who underwent surgery for sigmoid and rectal cancers Methods: A prospective study was conducted on 90 patients who underwent elective surgery for sigmoid or rectal cancer between January 2019 and December 2021 at the center. The QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CR29 questionnaires were utilized to assess the QoL of patients post-surgery. The QoL scores between the two groups were compared using t-tests and repeated measures ANOVA. Results: The average age of the patients was years, and 57.8% were females. The sigmoid group comprised 44 patients (48.8%) who underwent sigmoid colectomy, and the rectal group consisted of 46 patients (51.2%) who underwent low anterior resection. There were no significant differences in the baseline characteristics and QLQ-C30 scores between the two groups and also in other categories (sex, age groups, and cancer stages) (p > 0.05). However, a significant difference was observed between the QLQ-CR29 scores of the two surgical groups (p < 0.05). QLQ-CR29 was not significantly different between sex and age groups and cancer stages (p > 0.05). Conclusions: The study demonstrated that surgery for sigmoid and rectal cancers deteriorated the QoL of patients, irrespective of the type of surgery or the location of the tumor. There was no significant difference in the QoL between the sigmoid and rectal groups measured by QLQ-C30. However, QLQ-CR29 showed significantly better QoL for the rectal group.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
乙状结肠癌和直肠癌术后生活质量比较研究:单中心前瞻性研究
背景:乙状结肠癌和直肠癌是常见的恶性肿瘤,必须以手术切除作为主要治疗方式。然而,手术会严重影响患者的生活质量(QoL),尤其是在排便功能、性功能和心理健康方面。本研究旨在比较接受乙状结肠癌和直肠癌手术患者的生活质量:对该中心在2019年1月至2021年12月期间接受乙状结肠癌或直肠癌择期手术的90名患者进行了前瞻性研究。采用 QLQ-C30 和 QLQ-CR29 问卷评估患者手术后的 QoL。采用t检验和重复测量方差分析比较两组患者的QoL得分。结果患者平均年龄岁,57.8%为女性。乙状结肠组有 44 名患者(48.8%)接受了乙状结肠切除术,直肠组有 46 名患者(51.2%)接受了低位前切除术。两组患者的基线特征和 QLQ-C30 评分以及其他类别(性别、年龄组和癌症分期)均无明显差异(P > 0.05)。不过,两组手术者的 QLQ-CR29 评分有明显差异(P < 0.05)。QLQ-CR29 在性别、年龄组和癌症分期之间没有明显差异(P > 0.05)。结论研究表明,无论手术类型或肿瘤位置如何,乙状结肠癌和直肠癌手术都会使患者的 QoL 下降。根据 QLQ-C30 测量,乙状结肠组和直肠组的 QoL 无明显差异。不过,QLQ-CR29 显示直肠组的 QoL 明显更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparison of the efficacy Talc solution injection through Chest Tube and Talcum Powder through Pleuroscopy for the Treatment of Malignant Pleural Effusion: a randomized clinical trial An investigation on causes of delayed referral of patients with pleural empyema Unveiling the Hidden Peril: A Rare Case of Gossypiboma in an Elderly Woman Identifying the discriminative value of leukocytes, CRP and Procalcitonin serum level in detecting the anastomosis leakage after gastrointestinal surgery Comparing the outcomes of total thyroidectomy using a harmonic scalpel versus the conventional ligation techniques in Iran
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1