Performance of ChatGPT tool in the resolution of residency exams in Argentina

Javier González-Argote, William Castillo-González
{"title":"Performance of ChatGPT tool in the resolution of residency exams in Argentina","authors":"Javier González-Argote, William Castillo-González","doi":"10.56294/mw202456","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: artificial intelligence is classified as a tool of interest at the present time. Through its application, organizational processes and decision-making are transformed; while promoting innovative development.Objective: to describe the performance of the ChatGPT tool in solving residency exams.Method: an observational, descriptive, retrospective study was carried out. As the universe of the study, all test-type questions (single selection) were analyzed. The variables analyzed were each of the questions belonging to each exam (correct or incorrect answers). Descriptive statistics were applied.Results: Syllabus B stood out within group 1 with the highest number of correct answers (209 for 69.66%). For its part, within group 2, syllabus D was predominant with 141 correct answers (70.5%). The exams related to nursing stood out.Conclusions: the use of artificial intelligence tools such as ChatGPT is variable in the field of medical sciences. Their performance in solving scientific questions is heterogeneous. It may vary with respect to the format of the question and the topic addressed.","PeriodicalId":510092,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Medical Writing and Education","volume":"5 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Medical Writing and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56294/mw202456","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

Introduction: artificial intelligence is classified as a tool of interest at the present time. Through its application, organizational processes and decision-making are transformed; while promoting innovative development.Objective: to describe the performance of the ChatGPT tool in solving residency exams.Method: an observational, descriptive, retrospective study was carried out. As the universe of the study, all test-type questions (single selection) were analyzed. The variables analyzed were each of the questions belonging to each exam (correct or incorrect answers). Descriptive statistics were applied.Results: Syllabus B stood out within group 1 with the highest number of correct answers (209 for 69.66%). For its part, within group 2, syllabus D was predominant with 141 correct answers (70.5%). The exams related to nursing stood out.Conclusions: the use of artificial intelligence tools such as ChatGPT is variable in the field of medical sciences. Their performance in solving scientific questions is heterogeneous. It may vary with respect to the format of the question and the topic addressed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ChatGPT 工具在解决阿根廷住院医师考试方面的性能
导言:人工智能是当前备受关注的工具。目的:描述 ChatGPT 工具在解决住院医师考试中的表现。方法:开展了一项观察性、描述性、回顾性研究。研究范围包括所有测试类型的问题(单选)。分析的变量是属于每次考试的每道试题(正确或错误答案)。研究采用了描述性统计方法:在第 1 组中,课程 B 的正确答案数最多(209 个,占 69.66%)。在第 2 组中,教学大纲 D 占主导地位,答对 141 题,占 70.5%。结论:在医学科学领域,人工智能工具(如 ChatGPT)的使用情况各不相同。它们在解决科学问题方面的表现各不相同。结论:在医学科学领域,人工智能工具(如 ChatGPT)的使用情况各不相同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Conflict Management: A Practical Case, Analysis, Interpretation and Resolution Exploration of Scientific Documents through Unsupervised Learning-Based Segmentation Techniques Data Lakehouse: Next Generation Information System The challenge of university teaching practices Estrategia didáctica para la formación de habilidades en ensayos clínicos de residentes de Estomatología
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1