Polarizing Feedback Loops on Twitter: Congressional Tweets during the 2022 Midterm Elections

Patrick Rafail, Whitney E. O’Connell, Emma Sager
{"title":"Polarizing Feedback Loops on Twitter: Congressional Tweets during the 2022 Midterm Elections","authors":"Patrick Rafail, Whitney E. O’Connell, Emma Sager","doi":"10.1177/23780231241228924","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Political polarization has proliferated online. Scholars have identified multiple types of polarizing speech, which elicit stronger public reactions on social media platforms. Little research has focused on how social media platforms might hasten growing partisanship among both elites and the public. The authors examine these dynamics using a sample of 134,442 tweets posted by 527 members of Congress in the period surrounding the 2022 midterm elections. Our findings confirm that all types of polarization increase engagement, but party affiliation plays an important role in the process. Polarizing rhetoric from Republicans generally elicits a stronger reaction relative to that from Democrats. The exception is an increase in retweets of issue-based polarization when posted by Democrats. The authors conclude that all politicians are incentivized to adopt a polarizing presence on social media to raise their profiles. The diffusion of polarization may be shaped by partisanship, with the different parties amplifying different types of content.","PeriodicalId":513351,"journal":{"name":"Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World","volume":"31 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23780231241228924","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Political polarization has proliferated online. Scholars have identified multiple types of polarizing speech, which elicit stronger public reactions on social media platforms. Little research has focused on how social media platforms might hasten growing partisanship among both elites and the public. The authors examine these dynamics using a sample of 134,442 tweets posted by 527 members of Congress in the period surrounding the 2022 midterm elections. Our findings confirm that all types of polarization increase engagement, but party affiliation plays an important role in the process. Polarizing rhetoric from Republicans generally elicits a stronger reaction relative to that from Democrats. The exception is an increase in retweets of issue-based polarization when posted by Democrats. The authors conclude that all politicians are incentivized to adopt a polarizing presence on social media to raise their profiles. The diffusion of polarization may be shaped by partisanship, with the different parties amplifying different types of content.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
推特上两极分化的反馈回路:2022 年中期选举期间的国会推文
政治极化在网络上激增。学者们发现了多种类型的极化言论,这些言论在社交媒体平台上引起了公众的强烈反应。很少有研究关注社交媒体平台如何加速精英和公众之间日益增长的党派之争。作者使用 527 名国会议员在 2022 年中期选举期间发布的 134,442 条推文作为样本,对这些动态进行了研究。我们的研究结果证实,所有类型的两极分化都会提高参与度,但党派在这一过程中扮演着重要角色。相对于民主党人,共和党人的两极分化言论一般会引起更强烈的反应。例外情况是,当民主党人发布基于议题的极化言论时,转发量会增加。作者的结论是,所有政治家都有动力在社交媒体上采取极化的表现形式,以提高自己的形象。两极分化的扩散可能受党派影响,不同党派会放大不同类型的内容。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Framing Welfare Expansion: Citizenship, Collective Memory, and Fiscal Dilemmas in Mexico and Peru Visualizing Concentrations of Couples and Same-Sex Couples across U.S. Counties Political Polarization and the Dynamics between Actual Income and Perceived Income Inequality in the United States, 1987 to 2021 “They Need to Go in There”: Criminalized Subjectivity among Formerly Incarcerated Black Men Black Disadvantage or Advantage? Misalignment between State and Popular Understandings of Blackness in Mexico
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1