Prostate Health Index (PHI) as a triage tool for reducing unnecessary magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients at risk of prostate cancer

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY Clinical biochemistry Pub Date : 2024-04-06 DOI:10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2024.110759
Luisa Agnello , Matteo Vidali , Giuseppe Salvaggio , Francesco Agnello , Bruna Lo Sasso , Caterina Maria Gambino , Marcello Ciaccio
{"title":"Prostate Health Index (PHI) as a triage tool for reducing unnecessary magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients at risk of prostate cancer","authors":"Luisa Agnello ,&nbsp;Matteo Vidali ,&nbsp;Giuseppe Salvaggio ,&nbsp;Francesco Agnello ,&nbsp;Bruna Lo Sasso ,&nbsp;Caterina Maria Gambino ,&nbsp;Marcello Ciaccio","doi":"10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2024.110759","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The aim of this study is to assess the usefulness of the Prostate Health Index (PHI) as a triage tool for selecting patients at risk of prostate cancer (PCa) who should undergo multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (mpMRI).</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>We enrolled 204 patients with suspected PCa. For each patient, a blood sample was collected before mpMRI to measure PHI. Findings on mpMRI were assessed according to the Prostate Imaging Reporting &amp; Data System version 2.0 (PI-RADSv2) category scale.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>According to PI-RADSv2, patients were classified into two groups: PI-RADS &lt; 3 (48 %) and ≥ 3 (52 %). PHI showed the best performance for predicting PI-RADS ≥ 3 [AUC: 0,747 (0,679–0,815), 0,680(0,607–0,754), and 0,613 (0,535–0,690) for PHI, PSA ratio, and total PSA, respectively]. The best PHI cut-off was 30, with a sensitivity of 90%.</p><p>At the univariate logistic regression, total PSA (p = 0.007), PSA ratio (p = 0.001), [-2]proPSA (p = 0.019) and PHI (p &lt; 0.001) were associated with PI-RADS ≥ 3; however, at the multivariate analysis, only PHI (p &lt; 0.001) was found to be an independent predictor of PI-RADS ≥ 3.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>PHI could represent a reliable noninvasive tool for selecting patients to undergo mpMRI.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10172,"journal":{"name":"Clinical biochemistry","volume":"127 ","pages":"Article 110759"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical biochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0009912024000535","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The aim of this study is to assess the usefulness of the Prostate Health Index (PHI) as a triage tool for selecting patients at risk of prostate cancer (PCa) who should undergo multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (mpMRI).

Material and methods

We enrolled 204 patients with suspected PCa. For each patient, a blood sample was collected before mpMRI to measure PHI. Findings on mpMRI were assessed according to the Prostate Imaging Reporting & Data System version 2.0 (PI-RADSv2) category scale.

Results

According to PI-RADSv2, patients were classified into two groups: PI-RADS < 3 (48 %) and ≥ 3 (52 %). PHI showed the best performance for predicting PI-RADS ≥ 3 [AUC: 0,747 (0,679–0,815), 0,680(0,607–0,754), and 0,613 (0,535–0,690) for PHI, PSA ratio, and total PSA, respectively]. The best PHI cut-off was 30, with a sensitivity of 90%.

At the univariate logistic regression, total PSA (p = 0.007), PSA ratio (p = 0.001), [-2]proPSA (p = 0.019) and PHI (p < 0.001) were associated with PI-RADS ≥ 3; however, at the multivariate analysis, only PHI (p < 0.001) was found to be an independent predictor of PI-RADS ≥ 3.

Conclusion

PHI could represent a reliable noninvasive tool for selecting patients to undergo mpMRI.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将前列腺健康指数(PHI)作为减少前列腺癌高危患者不必要磁共振成像(MRI)的分诊工具
导言:本研究旨在评估前列腺健康指数(PHI)作为分诊工具在选择应接受多参数磁共振成像(mpMRI)检查的前列腺癌(PCa)高危患者方面的实用性。在进行 mpMRI 检查前,我们为每位患者采集了血液样本,以测量 PHI。根据前列腺成像报告和数据系统 2.0 版(PI-RADSv2)分类表评估 mpMRI 的结果:PI-RADS <3(48%)和≥3(52%)。PHI 在预测 PI-RADS ≥ 3 方面表现最佳[AUC:PHI、PSA 比值和总 PSA 的 AUC 分别为 0,747 (0,679-0,815)、0,680(0,607-0,754) 和 0,613 (0,535-0,690)]。单变量逻辑回归结果显示,总 PSA(P = 0.007)、PSA 比值(P = 0.001)、[-2]proPSA(P = 0.019)和 PHI(P < 0.001)与 PI-RADS ≥ 3 相关;但在多变量分析中,发现只有 PHI(p < 0.001)是 PI-RADS ≥ 3 的独立预测因子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical biochemistry
Clinical biochemistry 医学-医学实验技术
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
151
审稿时长
25 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Biochemistry publishes articles relating to clinical chemistry, molecular biology and genetics, therapeutic drug monitoring and toxicology, laboratory immunology and laboratory medicine in general, with the focus on analytical and clinical investigation of laboratory tests in humans used for diagnosis, prognosis, treatment and therapy, and monitoring of disease.
期刊最新文献
Quantitative abnormalities in the β-region of the electrophoretic profile of serum proteins as predictive markers of monoclonality: Machine learning for monoclonality prediction. Oxidative stress and obesity are associated with endothelial dysfunction and subclinical atherosclerosis in adolescents. Evaluation of an automated assay for eosinophil-derived neurotoxin in serum. Assessing the predictive value of elevated triglycerides, triglyceride-glucose index (TyG), and TG/HDL ratios for cardiovascular disease and mortality during 20 years of follow-up: Tehran lipid and glucose study. Utility of the combination of high fluorescence cells and tumor markers for the diagnosis of malignant pleural effusions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1