An empirical investigation of users' switching intention to public service robots: From the perspective of PPM framework

IF 7.8 1区 管理学 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Government Information Quarterly Pub Date : 2024-04-12 DOI:10.1016/j.giq.2024.101933
Tao Chen , Siqi Li , Zhongping Zeng , Zhehao Liang , Yuxi Chen , Wenshan Guo
{"title":"An empirical investigation of users' switching intention to public service robots: From the perspective of PPM framework","authors":"Tao Chen ,&nbsp;Siqi Li ,&nbsp;Zhongping Zeng ,&nbsp;Zhehao Liang ,&nbsp;Yuxi Chen ,&nbsp;Wenshan Guo","doi":"10.1016/j.giq.2024.101933","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In recent years, the application of artificial intelligence (AI) technology has become increasingly common in the public sector. Users have been switching their experiences in handling businesses from interactions with human staff to those with robots. Prior studies have focused on investigating the key factors that influence users' adoption of public service robots; however, only a few have considered users' switching behaviors from traditional human services to robotic ones. This study employs a push–pull–mooring (PPM) framework derived from the human migration field to understand the factors that affect users' switching intentions in the context of public service robot applications. The research model was tested with 419 valid responses among users who had experienced both human services and public service robots in Chinese government service halls. The structural equation modeling (SEM) method was applied to quantitatively analyze the data. This study sheds new light on the key determinants of users' switching intentions toward public service robots from the perspectives of push, pull, and mooring effects. The results can help practitioners and managers understand users' intentions for such switches and make scientific decisions to encourage citizens' positive responses to service robots.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48258,"journal":{"name":"Government Information Quarterly","volume":"41 2","pages":"Article 101933"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Government Information Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0740624X2400025X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent years, the application of artificial intelligence (AI) technology has become increasingly common in the public sector. Users have been switching their experiences in handling businesses from interactions with human staff to those with robots. Prior studies have focused on investigating the key factors that influence users' adoption of public service robots; however, only a few have considered users' switching behaviors from traditional human services to robotic ones. This study employs a push–pull–mooring (PPM) framework derived from the human migration field to understand the factors that affect users' switching intentions in the context of public service robot applications. The research model was tested with 419 valid responses among users who had experienced both human services and public service robots in Chinese government service halls. The structural equation modeling (SEM) method was applied to quantitatively analyze the data. This study sheds new light on the key determinants of users' switching intentions toward public service robots from the perspectives of push, pull, and mooring effects. The results can help practitioners and managers understand users' intentions for such switches and make scientific decisions to encourage citizens' positive responses to service robots.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用户对公共服务机器人转换意向的实证调查:从 PPM 框架的角度
近年来,人工智能(AI)技术在公共部门的应用越来越普遍。用户在处理业务时的体验已经从与人类工作人员的互动转向与机器人的互动。以往的研究主要集中于调查影响用户采用公共服务机器人的关键因素,但只有少数研究考虑了用户从传统人工服务向机器人服务的转换行为。本研究采用了源自人类迁移领域的推拉式迁移(PPM)框架,以了解在公共服务机器人应用背景下影响用户转换意图的因素。研究模型通过 419 份有效问卷进行了测试,这些问卷来自在中国政府服务大厅体验过人工服务和公共服务机器人的用户。采用结构方程建模(SEM)方法对数据进行了定量分析。本研究从推力效应、拉力效应和系泊效应的角度揭示了用户对公共服务机器人转换意向的关键决定因素。研究结果有助于实践者和管理者了解用户的转换意图,并做出科学决策,鼓励市民对服务机器人做出积极回应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Government Information Quarterly
Government Information Quarterly INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
15.70
自引率
16.70%
发文量
106
期刊介绍: Government Information Quarterly (GIQ) delves into the convergence of policy, information technology, government, and the public. It explores the impact of policies on government information flows, the role of technology in innovative government services, and the dynamic between citizens and governing bodies in the digital age. GIQ serves as a premier journal, disseminating high-quality research and insights that bridge the realms of policy, information technology, government, and public engagement.
期刊最新文献
A more secure framework for open government data sharing based on federated learning Does trust in government moderate the perception towards deepfakes? Comparative perspectives from Asia on the risks of AI and misinformation for democracy Open government data and self-efficacy: The empirical evidence of micro foundation via survey experiments Transforming towards inclusion-by-design: Information system design principles shaping data-driven financial inclusiveness Bridging the gap: Towards an expanded toolkit for AI-driven decision-making in the public sector
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1