Differences in outcomes by race/ethnicity after thoracic surgery in a large integrated health system

IF 1.4 Q3 SURGERY Surgery open science Pub Date : 2024-04-15 DOI:10.1016/j.sopen.2024.04.002
Kian C. Banks MD , Julia Wei MPH , Leyda Marrero Morales BS , Zeuz A. Islas BS , Nathan J. Alcasid MD , Cynthia J. Susai MD , Angela Sun BS , Katemanee Burapachaisri BS , Ashish R. Patel MD , Simon K. Ashiku MD , Jeffrey B. Velotta MD
{"title":"Differences in outcomes by race/ethnicity after thoracic surgery in a large integrated health system","authors":"Kian C. Banks MD ,&nbsp;Julia Wei MPH ,&nbsp;Leyda Marrero Morales BS ,&nbsp;Zeuz A. Islas BS ,&nbsp;Nathan J. Alcasid MD ,&nbsp;Cynthia J. Susai MD ,&nbsp;Angela Sun BS ,&nbsp;Katemanee Burapachaisri BS ,&nbsp;Ashish R. Patel MD ,&nbsp;Simon K. Ashiku MD ,&nbsp;Jeffrey B. Velotta MD","doi":"10.1016/j.sopen.2024.04.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Disparities exist throughout surgery. We aimed to assess for racial/ethnic disparities among outcomes in a large thoracic surgery patient population.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We reviewed all thoracic surgery patients treated at our integrated health system from January 1, 2016–December 31, 2020. Post-operative outcomes including length of stay (LOS), 30-day return to the emergency department (30d-ED), 30-day readmission, 30- and 90-day outpatient appointments, and 30- and 90-day mortality were compared by race/ethnicity. Bivariate analyses and multivariable logistic regression were performed. Our multivariable models adjusted for age, sex, body mass index, Charlson Comorbidity Index, surgery type, neighborhood deprivation index, insurance, and home region.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of 2730 included patients, 59.4 % were non-Hispanic White, 15.0 % were Asian, 11.9 % were Hispanic, 9.6 % were Black, and 4.1 % were Other. Median (Q1-Q3) LOS (in hours) was shortest among non-Hispanic White (37.3 (29.2–76.1)) and Other (36.5 (29.3–75.4)) patients followed by Hispanic (46.8 (29.9–78.1)) patients with Asian (51.3 (30.7–81.9)) and Black (53.7 (30.6–101.6)) patients experiencing the longest LOS (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.01). 30d-ED rates were highest among Hispanic patients (21.3 %), followed by Black (19.2 %), non-Hispanic White (18.1 %), Asian (13.4 %), and Other (8.0 %) patients (p &lt; 0.01). On multivariable analysis, Hispanic ethnicity (Odds Ratio (OR) 1.43 (95 % CI 1.03–1.97)) and Medicaid insurance (OR 2.37 (95 % CI 1.48–3.81)) were associated with higher 30d-ED rates. No racial/ethnic disparities were found among other outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Despite parity across multiple surgical outcomes, disparities remain related to patient encounters within our system. Health systems must track such disparities in addition to standard clinical outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Key message</h3><p>While our large integrated health system has been able to demonstrate parity across many major surgical outcomes among our thoracic surgery patients, race/ethnicity disparities persist including in the number of post-operative return trips to the emergency department. Tracking outcome disparities to a granular level such as return visits to the emergency department and number of follow up appointments is critical as health systems strive to achieve equitable care.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74892,"journal":{"name":"Surgery open science","volume":"19 ","pages":"Pages 118-124"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S258984502400054X/pdfft?md5=b3814c0e5152901de1598f6fe2a7480f&pid=1-s2.0-S258984502400054X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery open science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S258984502400054X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Disparities exist throughout surgery. We aimed to assess for racial/ethnic disparities among outcomes in a large thoracic surgery patient population.

Methods

We reviewed all thoracic surgery patients treated at our integrated health system from January 1, 2016–December 31, 2020. Post-operative outcomes including length of stay (LOS), 30-day return to the emergency department (30d-ED), 30-day readmission, 30- and 90-day outpatient appointments, and 30- and 90-day mortality were compared by race/ethnicity. Bivariate analyses and multivariable logistic regression were performed. Our multivariable models adjusted for age, sex, body mass index, Charlson Comorbidity Index, surgery type, neighborhood deprivation index, insurance, and home region.

Results

Of 2730 included patients, 59.4 % were non-Hispanic White, 15.0 % were Asian, 11.9 % were Hispanic, 9.6 % were Black, and 4.1 % were Other. Median (Q1-Q3) LOS (in hours) was shortest among non-Hispanic White (37.3 (29.2–76.1)) and Other (36.5 (29.3–75.4)) patients followed by Hispanic (46.8 (29.9–78.1)) patients with Asian (51.3 (30.7–81.9)) and Black (53.7 (30.6–101.6)) patients experiencing the longest LOS (p < 0.01). 30d-ED rates were highest among Hispanic patients (21.3 %), followed by Black (19.2 %), non-Hispanic White (18.1 %), Asian (13.4 %), and Other (8.0 %) patients (p < 0.01). On multivariable analysis, Hispanic ethnicity (Odds Ratio (OR) 1.43 (95 % CI 1.03–1.97)) and Medicaid insurance (OR 2.37 (95 % CI 1.48–3.81)) were associated with higher 30d-ED rates. No racial/ethnic disparities were found among other outcomes.

Conclusions

Despite parity across multiple surgical outcomes, disparities remain related to patient encounters within our system. Health systems must track such disparities in addition to standard clinical outcomes.

Key message

While our large integrated health system has been able to demonstrate parity across many major surgical outcomes among our thoracic surgery patients, race/ethnicity disparities persist including in the number of post-operative return trips to the emergency department. Tracking outcome disparities to a granular level such as return visits to the emergency department and number of follow up appointments is critical as health systems strive to achieve equitable care.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大型综合医疗系统胸外科手术后不同种族/族裔的治疗效果差异
背景整个外科领域都存在差异。我们旨在评估大型胸外科手术患者群体中的种族/民族差异。我们按种族/民族对术后结果进行了比较,包括住院时间(LOS)、30 天急诊返院率(30d-ED)、30 天再入院率、30 天和 90 天门诊预约率以及 30 天和 90 天死亡率。我们进行了双变量分析和多变量逻辑回归。我们的多变量模型对年龄、性别、体重指数、Charlson 生病指数、手术类型、社区贫困指数、保险和家庭所在地区进行了调整。结果 在纳入的 2730 名患者中,59.4% 为非西班牙裔白人,15.0% 为亚裔,11.9% 为西班牙裔,9.6% 为黑人,4.1% 为其他族裔。非西班牙裔白人(37.3 (29.2-76.1))和其他(36.5 (29.3-75.4))患者的中位(Q1-Q3)LOS(小时)最短,其次是西班牙裔(46.8 (29.9-78.1))患者,亚裔(51.3 (30.7-81.9))和黑人(53.7 (30.6-101.6))患者的 LOS 最长(p < 0.01)。西班牙裔患者的 30d-ED 发生率最高(21.3%),其次是黑人(19.2%)、非西班牙裔白人(18.1%)、亚裔(13.4%)和其他(8.0%)患者(p < 0.01)。在多变量分析中,西班牙裔(Odds Ratio (OR) 1.43 (95 % CI 1.03-1.97))和医疗补助保险(OR 2.37 (95 % CI 1.48-3.81))与较高的 30d-ED 发生率相关。结论尽管多种手术结果均等,但在我们的系统中,患者就诊情况仍存在差异。关键信息虽然我们的大型综合医疗系统在胸外科患者的许多主要手术结果上实现了均等,但种族/人种差异依然存在,包括术后返回急诊科的次数。在医疗系统努力实现公平护理的过程中,对急诊科复诊次数和复诊预约次数等结果差异进行细化跟踪至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
66 days
期刊最新文献
Management of Colorectal Cancer with Synchronous Liver Metastases: A systematic review of national and International Clinical Guidelines (CoSMIC-G) Primary delayed gastric emptying after pylorus-resecting pancreatoduodenectomy: A matched-pair comparison of Roux-en-Y vs. Billroth-II reconstruction Immersive collaborative virtual reality for case-based graduate student teaching in thoracic surgery: A piloting study Engagement and learning approaches among medical students in an online surgical teaching programme: A cross-sectional study Gender and age specific dynamics of health-related postoperative outcome measures following the laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1