“I Demand the Friendship of Zoroaster”: William Godwin and World Literature of Friendship

IF 0.2 3区 文学 N/A LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS NEOPHILOLOGUS Pub Date : 2024-04-12 DOI:10.1007/s11061-024-09804-0
Sungjin Shin
{"title":"“I Demand the Friendship of Zoroaster”: William Godwin and World Literature of Friendship","authors":"Sungjin Shin","doi":"10.1007/s11061-024-09804-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The debate about world literature holds a prominent place in national and comparative literary studies today. However, despite its significance, critics have yet to reach a consensus on how to address its challenges, which include its methodology, the vast volume of texts, uneven circulation, and difficulties of translation. This essay examines the concerns of world literature through the lens of William Godwin’s philosophy on history writing. While Godwin’s historical perspective has not been widely discussed in relation to world literature, his reflections on history and history writing that resist a comparative approach to universal history engage with similar issues found in the debates on world literature. Delving into Godwin’s writings on history, which challenge distant approaches to history and stress the importance of the individual and the particular, this essay argues that Godwin’s pursuit of a purposeful and intimate relationship with the past offers important insights for addressing the issues of world literature. In particular, Godwin’s emphasis on the purpose of studying history and his affectionate approach toward the temporal “other” provide helpful directions in forming respectful relationships with the geographical and ethnic “other” and their literature. Godwin’s pursuit of deep knowledge and friendship with the inspiring past proposes a valuable alternative to seeking systematic incorporation of the other’s literature or unthinkingly expanding world literary canon.</p>","PeriodicalId":44392,"journal":{"name":"NEOPHILOLOGUS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NEOPHILOLOGUS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11061-024-09804-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The debate about world literature holds a prominent place in national and comparative literary studies today. However, despite its significance, critics have yet to reach a consensus on how to address its challenges, which include its methodology, the vast volume of texts, uneven circulation, and difficulties of translation. This essay examines the concerns of world literature through the lens of William Godwin’s philosophy on history writing. While Godwin’s historical perspective has not been widely discussed in relation to world literature, his reflections on history and history writing that resist a comparative approach to universal history engage with similar issues found in the debates on world literature. Delving into Godwin’s writings on history, which challenge distant approaches to history and stress the importance of the individual and the particular, this essay argues that Godwin’s pursuit of a purposeful and intimate relationship with the past offers important insights for addressing the issues of world literature. In particular, Godwin’s emphasis on the purpose of studying history and his affectionate approach toward the temporal “other” provide helpful directions in forming respectful relationships with the geographical and ethnic “other” and their literature. Godwin’s pursuit of deep knowledge and friendship with the inspiring past proposes a valuable alternative to seeking systematic incorporation of the other’s literature or unthinkingly expanding world literary canon.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
"我要求琐罗亚斯德的友谊威廉-戈德温与世界友谊文学
关于世界文学的讨论在当今的国家文学和比较文学研究中占有重要地位。然而,尽管世界文学具有重要意义,评论家们仍未就如何应对世界文学面临的挑战达成共识,这些挑战包括世界文学的方法论、文本数量庞大、流通不均以及翻译困难等。本文从威廉-戈德温的历史写作哲学的视角来探讨世界文学所关注的问题。虽然戈德温的历史观与世界文学的关系尚未得到广泛讨论,但他对历史和历史写作的反思抵制了对普遍历史的比较方法,并涉及到世界文学辩论中的类似问题。戈德温的历史著述对遥远的历史方法提出了挑战,并强调了个体和特殊性的重要性,本文深入探讨了戈德温的历史著述,认为戈德温追求与过去建立有目的的亲密关系,为解决世界文学问题提供了重要的启示。特别是,戈德温对研究历史的目的的强调以及他对时间 "他者 "的亲切态度,为我们与地理和种族 "他者 "及其文学建立相互尊重的关系提供了有益的指导。戈德温追求对鼓舞人心的过去的深入了解和友谊,为寻求系统地吸收他者文学或不假思索地扩大世界文学典籍提供了宝贵的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
NEOPHILOLOGUS
NEOPHILOLOGUS Multiple-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: Neophilologus is an international peer-reviewed journal devoted to the study of modern and medieval language and literature, including literary theory, comparative literature, philology and textual criticism. The languages of publication are English, French, German and Spanish.
期刊最新文献
Locating Anglo-Italian Communities in Bevis and the Naples Manuscript Elizabeth Acevedo, Laura Esquivel, and the Politics of Multilingualism La poesía de Quevedo al margen del Parnaso: hacia una edición crítica y anotada de la “musa décima” Unequal Equality: Sex, Adultery, and Female Domination in Hartmann von Aue’s Erec The Shropshire Redemption: John Audelay’s Carols, Repetition, and Confessional Authority
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1