Measuring Cognitive Function and Cognitive Decline with Response Time Data in NSHAP

Seth Sanders, Lynne Steuerle Schofield, L Philip Schumm, Linda Waite
{"title":"Measuring Cognitive Function and Cognitive Decline with Response Time Data in NSHAP","authors":"Seth Sanders, Lynne Steuerle Schofield, L Philip Schumm, Linda Waite","doi":"10.1093/geronb/gbae037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVES Scholarly, clinical, and policy interest in cognitive function has grown over the last several decades in part due to large increases in Alzheimer’s Disease and related dementias as populations age. However, adequate measures of cognitive function have not been available in many research data sets. We argue that a wealth of previously unexploited survey data exists to model cognition and cognitive decline. METHODS We use metadata of the time it takes older respondents in the National Social Life, Health and Aging Survey, which we label response times (RT), to answer questions in a standard cognitive assessment. We compare several measures of RT to a survey-adapted form of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). RESULTS We show that RT predict both concurrent and future MoCA scores. Our results show that longer and more varied RT at baseline predict lower MoCA scores five year later, net of baseline scores and controls. We also show that the effect of RT measures on predicting current MoCA differ for individuals of different races and ages, but are not different by gender. DISCUSSION Our paper demonstrates that RT constitute a separate powerful measure of cognitive functioning. RT may be remarkably useful both to clinicians and social scientists because they can increase accuracy of cognitive assessment without increasing the time it takes to administer the assessment.","PeriodicalId":501650,"journal":{"name":"The Journals of Gerontology: Series B","volume":"192 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journals of Gerontology: Series B","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbae037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OBJECTIVES Scholarly, clinical, and policy interest in cognitive function has grown over the last several decades in part due to large increases in Alzheimer’s Disease and related dementias as populations age. However, adequate measures of cognitive function have not been available in many research data sets. We argue that a wealth of previously unexploited survey data exists to model cognition and cognitive decline. METHODS We use metadata of the time it takes older respondents in the National Social Life, Health and Aging Survey, which we label response times (RT), to answer questions in a standard cognitive assessment. We compare several measures of RT to a survey-adapted form of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). RESULTS We show that RT predict both concurrent and future MoCA scores. Our results show that longer and more varied RT at baseline predict lower MoCA scores five year later, net of baseline scores and controls. We also show that the effect of RT measures on predicting current MoCA differ for individuals of different races and ages, but are not different by gender. DISCUSSION Our paper demonstrates that RT constitute a separate powerful measure of cognitive functioning. RT may be remarkably useful both to clinicians and social scientists because they can increase accuracy of cognitive assessment without increasing the time it takes to administer the assessment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用《国家人类健康行动计划》中的响应时间数据衡量认知功能和认知能力衰退情况
目的 过去几十年来,随着人口老龄化的加剧,阿尔茨海默病和相关痴呆症的发病率大幅上升,因此学者、临床和政策部门对认知功能的关注与日俱增。然而,在许多研究数据集中还没有对认知功能进行适当的测量。我们认为,有大量以前未被利用的调查数据可用于建立认知和认知衰退模型。方法 我们使用全国社会生活、健康和老龄化调查中老年受访者回答标准认知评估中的问题所花费时间的元数据(我们称之为回答时间(RT))。我们将几种 RT 测量方法与蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)的调查适应形式进行了比较。结果 我们的研究表明,RT 可以预测当前和未来的 MoCA 分数。我们的结果表明,在扣除基线分数和对照组后,基线时更长和更多样的 RT 预测了五年后较低的 MoCA 分数。我们还发现,RT 测量对预测当前 MoCA 的影响因种族和年龄而异,但因性别而无差异。讨论 我们的论文表明,RT 是衡量认知功能的一个单独的有力指标。RT 对临床医生和社会科学家都非常有用,因为它们可以在不增加评估时间的情况下提高认知评估的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Temporary Setback or Lasting Challenge? The Impact of Transient and Persistent Functional disability on later life well-being Context Matters: Internet Usage and Loneliness Among Middle-Aged and Older Adults During the COVID-19 Pandemic Worrying Across the Generations: The Impact of Adult Grandchildren’s Problems on Grandparents’ Well-Being The Relationship Between 10-Year Changes in Cognitive Control Beliefs and Cognitive Performance in Middle and Later Adulthood Improving Memory through Better Sleep in Community-dwelling Older Adults: A Tai Chi Intervention Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1