Fundamental movement skill proficiency of selected South African Montessorian pre-schoolers

IF 1.8 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of Early Childhood Research Pub Date : 2024-04-11 DOI:10.1177/1476718x241241141
Eileen Africa, Michael Duncan, Lauren Bath
{"title":"Fundamental movement skill proficiency of selected South African Montessorian pre-schoolers","authors":"Eileen Africa, Michael Duncan, Lauren Bath","doi":"10.1177/1476718x241241141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Montessori philosophy and environment offers opportunities for free movement within the classroom. Physical development includes the acquisition of fundamental movement skills (FMS) which children acquire through different opportunities for movement. Previous research has shown that Montessorian pre-schoolers were more physically active during the school day compared to those attending traditional pre-schools. This led to questioning whether this noted increase in physical activity had any effect on the learning of FMS. The purpose of this study was to examine the proficiency of FMS of children aged 3–6 years in three private Montessori pre-schools. This purposive sample consisted of 105 Montessori 3–6 year olds in the Western Cape, South Africa. FMS were evaluated using the Test of Gross Motor Development Second Edition (TGMD-2). About 51.6% of the 3 year olds mastered run but scored in the poor category for five out of the six object control skills. The majority of 4 year olds (75.7%) reached mastery only in run. Most of the 5 year olds achieved mastery in run (69%) and slide (65.5%), and only 51.7% in kick. About 87.5% of the 6 year olds achieved mastery in run and slide, only half of them in leap, hop, kick and catch. No area of FMS were mastered by all the participants, but overall, the performance ranged from ‘average’ to ‘above average’. This shows potential for improvement in FMS proficiency. Therefore, children, even in a Montessori environment, require specific instruction to achieve proficiency of all FMS.","PeriodicalId":46652,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Early Childhood Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Early Childhood Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1476718x241241141","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Montessori philosophy and environment offers opportunities for free movement within the classroom. Physical development includes the acquisition of fundamental movement skills (FMS) which children acquire through different opportunities for movement. Previous research has shown that Montessorian pre-schoolers were more physically active during the school day compared to those attending traditional pre-schools. This led to questioning whether this noted increase in physical activity had any effect on the learning of FMS. The purpose of this study was to examine the proficiency of FMS of children aged 3–6 years in three private Montessori pre-schools. This purposive sample consisted of 105 Montessori 3–6 year olds in the Western Cape, South Africa. FMS were evaluated using the Test of Gross Motor Development Second Edition (TGMD-2). About 51.6% of the 3 year olds mastered run but scored in the poor category for five out of the six object control skills. The majority of 4 year olds (75.7%) reached mastery only in run. Most of the 5 year olds achieved mastery in run (69%) and slide (65.5%), and only 51.7% in kick. About 87.5% of the 6 year olds achieved mastery in run and slide, only half of them in leap, hop, kick and catch. No area of FMS were mastered by all the participants, but overall, the performance ranged from ‘average’ to ‘above average’. This shows potential for improvement in FMS proficiency. Therefore, children, even in a Montessori environment, require specific instruction to achieve proficiency of all FMS.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
选定的南非蒙特梭利学龄前儿童的基本动作技能熟练程度
蒙台梭利的理念和环境为儿童提供了在教室里自由活动的机会。身体发育包括基本运动技能(FMS)的习得,儿童通过不同的运动机会习得这些技能。以往的研究表明,与就读于传统学前班的儿童相比,蒙台梭利学前班儿童在校期间的运动量更大。这不禁让人质疑,体育活动的增加是否会对 FMS 的学习产生影响。本研究旨在考察三所私立蒙特梭利学前学校中 3-6 岁儿童对 FMS 的掌握程度。这个有目的性的样本包括南非西开普省 105 名 3-6 岁的蒙特梭利儿童。使用粗大运动发展测试第二版(TGMD-2)对幼儿的粗大运动能力进行了评估。约 51.6% 的 3 岁儿童掌握了跑的技能,但在六项物体控制技能中,有五项得分较低。大多数 4 岁儿童(75.7%)只掌握了跑的技能。大多数 5 岁幼儿(69%)掌握了跑和滑行技能(65.5%),只有 51.7%掌握了踢技能。约 87.5%的 6 岁儿童掌握了跑和滑步,只有一半的儿童掌握了跳跃、跳、踢和接球。没有任何一个项目是所有参与者都能掌握的,但总体而言,他们的表现从 "平均水平 "到 "高于平均水平 "不等。这表明,FMS 的熟练程度还有提高的潜力。因此,即使是在蒙特梭利环境中,儿童也需要特定的指导才能熟练掌握所有的 FMS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Early Childhood Research
Journal of Early Childhood Research EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: The Journal of Early Childhood Research provides an international forum for the dissemination of early childhood research which transcends disciplinary boundaries and applies theory and research within academic and professional communities. The journal reflects international growth in research on young children’s learning and development and the impact of this on provision. The journal enjoys a wide readership which includes policy-makers, practitioners and researchers in the intersecting fields of early childhood education and care, with early childhood defined as the years from birth to eight.
期刊最新文献
‘Maybe that makes a difference actually’: Attuning to praxis for anti-racist social justice leadership among nursery school head teachers in the UK A model for play in the preschool curriculum: A phenomenological study Skin deep: A review of early childhood policy affordances for anti-racist practice in England and Scotland Before race: A literature review on de/colonial habits in play within early childhood Playing with open-ended material as experiences of democracy: The Waldorf case
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1