Factors affecting judicial system efficiency: a systematic mapping review with a focus on Italy

Monica Giancotti, Giorgia Rotundo, Marianna Mauro
{"title":"Factors affecting judicial system efficiency: a systematic mapping review with a focus on Italy","authors":"Monica Giancotti, Giorgia Rotundo, Marianna Mauro","doi":"10.1108/ijppm-05-2023-0215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>European justice systems are facing a dramatic performance crisis due to the frequent inability to resolve cases without incurring unreasonable delays and backlogs. In this framework, the Italian Judicial system places itself well below the European countries average, in terms of speed of resolution of administrative, civil and criminal trials. The purpose of the paper was to (1) identify factors affecting Italian judicial system efficiency and (2) identify potential actions to manage them, improving judicial system efficiency.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>In order to achieve the aims of this paper, a systematic review to map all critical factors discussed in previous studies was performed. Studies were extracted from Google Scholar, Web of Science and SSRN databases. In total, 22 studies were included.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The identified factors of inefficiency of the Italian judicial system have been divided into three macro-classes depending on whether they concern human resource management, the judicial process or whether they pertain to internal or external outside the judicial organization. For each of these, possible strategies have been developed in a new conceptual framework.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>The framework seeks to assist policymakers in forming policy measures that can significantly increase court effectiveness. This is the first attempt to review and map all factors affecting judicial system efficiency systematically, providing a new conceptual framework to manage them.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":47944,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management","volume":"74 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijppm-05-2023-0215","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

European justice systems are facing a dramatic performance crisis due to the frequent inability to resolve cases without incurring unreasonable delays and backlogs. In this framework, the Italian Judicial system places itself well below the European countries average, in terms of speed of resolution of administrative, civil and criminal trials. The purpose of the paper was to (1) identify factors affecting Italian judicial system efficiency and (2) identify potential actions to manage them, improving judicial system efficiency.

Design/methodology/approach

In order to achieve the aims of this paper, a systematic review to map all critical factors discussed in previous studies was performed. Studies were extracted from Google Scholar, Web of Science and SSRN databases. In total, 22 studies were included.

Findings

The identified factors of inefficiency of the Italian judicial system have been divided into three macro-classes depending on whether they concern human resource management, the judicial process or whether they pertain to internal or external outside the judicial organization. For each of these, possible strategies have been developed in a new conceptual framework.

Originality/value

The framework seeks to assist policymakers in forming policy measures that can significantly increase court effectiveness. This is the first attempt to review and map all factors affecting judicial system efficiency systematically, providing a new conceptual framework to manage them.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
影响司法系统效率的因素:以意大利为重点的系统性绘图审查
目的欧洲司法系统正面临着巨大的绩效危机,原因是经常无法在不造成不合理拖延和积压的情况下解决案件。在此框架下,意大利司法系统在行政、民事和刑事审判的解决速度方面远远低于欧洲国家的平均水平。本文的目的是:(1) 找出影响意大利司法系统效率的因素;(2) 找出管理这些因素的潜在行动,从而提高司法系统的效率。研究内容摘自 Google Scholar、Web of Science 和 SSRN 数据库。研究结果根据是否涉及人力资源管理、司法程序或是否涉及司法组织内部或外部,将已确定的意大利司法系统效率低下的因素分为三个宏观类别。原创性/价值该框架旨在帮助政策制定者制定能够显著提高法院效率的政策措施。这是首次尝试对影响司法系统效率的所有因素进行系统审查和绘图,为管理这些因素提供了一个新的概念框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
9.70%
发文量
87
期刊介绍: ■Organisational design and methods ■Performance management ■Performance measurement tools and techniques ■Process analysis, engineering and re-engineering ■Quality and business excellence management Articles can address these topics theoretically or empirically through either a descriptive or critical approach. The co-Editors support articles that significantly bring new knowledge to the area both for academics and practitioners. The material for publication in IJPPM should be written in a manner which makes it accessible to its entire wide-ranging readership. Submissions of highly technical or mathematically-oriented papers are discouraged.
期刊最新文献
Industry 5.0's pillars and Lean Six Sigma: mapping the current interrelationship and future research directions Exploring the critical drivers of blockchain technology adoption in Indian industries using the best-worst method Process mining-enhanced quality management in food processing industries Enhancing new service development effectiveness: the role of customer participation and the moderating effects of empowerment and satisfaction Emotional intelligence as an antecedent of employees’ job outcomes through knowledge sharing in IT-ITeS firms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1