Patterns of residential differentiation and labor control at Baking Pot and Lower Dover in the Belize River Valley

Pub Date : 2024-03-28 DOI:10.1017/s095653612300007x
John P. Walden, Julie A. Hoggarth, Claire E. Ebert, Kyle Shaw-Müller, Weiyu Ran, Yijia Qiu, Olivia P. Ellis, Brett Meyer, Michael Biggie, Tia B. Watkins, Rafael A. Guerra, Jaime J. Awe
{"title":"Patterns of residential differentiation and labor control at Baking Pot and Lower Dover in the Belize River Valley","authors":"John P. Walden, Julie A. Hoggarth, Claire E. Ebert, Kyle Shaw-Müller, Weiyu Ran, Yijia Qiu, Olivia P. Ellis, Brett Meyer, Michael Biggie, Tia B. Watkins, Rafael A. Guerra, Jaime J. Awe","doi":"10.1017/s095653612300007x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Classic Maya polities of Baking Pot and Lower Dover developed along two dramatically different trajectories. At Baking Pot, the capital and associated apical elite regime grew concomitantly with surrounding populations over a thousand-year period. The smaller polity of Lower Dover, in contrast, formed when a Late Classic political center was established by an emergent apical elite regime amidst several long-established intermediate elite-headed districts. The different trajectories through which these polities formed should have clear implications for residential size variability. We employ the Gini coefficient to measure variability in household volume to compare patterns of residential size differentiation between the two polities. The Gini coefficients, while similar, suggest greater differentiation in residential size at Baking Pot than at Lower Dover, likely related to the centralized control of labor by the ruling elite at Baking Pot. While the Gini coefficient is synonymous with measuring wealth inequalities, we suggest that in the Classic period Belize River Valley, residential size was more reflective of labor control.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s095653612300007x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Classic Maya polities of Baking Pot and Lower Dover developed along two dramatically different trajectories. At Baking Pot, the capital and associated apical elite regime grew concomitantly with surrounding populations over a thousand-year period. The smaller polity of Lower Dover, in contrast, formed when a Late Classic political center was established by an emergent apical elite regime amidst several long-established intermediate elite-headed districts. The different trajectories through which these polities formed should have clear implications for residential size variability. We employ the Gini coefficient to measure variability in household volume to compare patterns of residential size differentiation between the two polities. The Gini coefficients, while similar, suggest greater differentiation in residential size at Baking Pot than at Lower Dover, likely related to the centralized control of labor by the ruling elite at Baking Pot. While the Gini coefficient is synonymous with measuring wealth inequalities, we suggest that in the Classic period Belize River Valley, residential size was more reflective of labor control.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
伯利兹河谷烘烤锅和下多佛的居住分化和劳动力控制模式
古典玛雅 "烤炉 "和 "下多佛 "政体的发展轨迹大相径庭。在 Baking Pot,都城和相关的顶端精英政权与周围的人口同步增长,历时千年。与此相反,下多佛尔较小的政体则是由一个新出现的顶端精英政权在几个历史悠久的中间精英领导的地区中建立起一个晚期古典时期的政治中心而形成的。这些政体形成的不同轨迹对居住规模的变化有着明显的影响。我们采用基尼系数来衡量家庭数量的变化,以比较两个政体之间的住宅规模分化模式。基尼系数虽然相似,但却表明烤锅村的居住规模分化要大于下多佛村,这可能与烤锅村统治精英对劳动力的集中控制有关。虽然基尼系数是衡量财富不平等的同义词,但我们认为,在古典时期的伯利兹河谷,居住面积更能反映劳动力的控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1