Rigor with machine learning from field theory to the Poincaré conjecture

IF 44.8 1区 物理与天体物理 Q1 PHYSICS, APPLIED Nature Reviews Physics Pub Date : 2024-04-08 DOI:10.1038/s42254-024-00709-0
Sergei Gukov, James Halverson, Fabian Ruehle
{"title":"Rigor with machine learning from field theory to the Poincaré conjecture","authors":"Sergei Gukov, James Halverson, Fabian Ruehle","doi":"10.1038/s42254-024-00709-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite their successes, machine learning techniques are often stochastic, error-prone and blackbox. How could they then be used in fields such as theoretical physics and pure mathematics for which error-free results and deep understanding are a must? In this Perspective, we discuss techniques for obtaining zero-error results with machine learning, with a focus on theoretical physics and pure mathematics. Non-rigorous methods can enable rigorous results via conjecture generation or verification by reinforcement learning. We survey applications of these techniques-for-rigor ranging from string theory to the smooth 4D Poincaré conjecture in low-dimensional topology. We also discuss connections between machine learning theory and mathematics or theoretical physics such as a new approach to field theory motivated by neural network theory, and a theory of Riemannian metric flows induced by neural network gradient descent, which encompasses Perelman’s formulation of the Ricci flow that was used to solve the 3D Poincaré conjecture. Machine learning techniques may appear ill-suited for application in fields that prioritize rigor and deep understanding; however, they have recently found unexpected uses in theoretical physics and pure mathematics. In this Perspective, Gukov, Halverson and Ruehle have discussed rigorous applications of machine learning to theoretical physics and pure mathematics.","PeriodicalId":19024,"journal":{"name":"Nature Reviews Physics","volume":"6 5","pages":"310-319"},"PeriodicalIF":44.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Reviews Physics","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s42254-024-00709-0","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHYSICS, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite their successes, machine learning techniques are often stochastic, error-prone and blackbox. How could they then be used in fields such as theoretical physics and pure mathematics for which error-free results and deep understanding are a must? In this Perspective, we discuss techniques for obtaining zero-error results with machine learning, with a focus on theoretical physics and pure mathematics. Non-rigorous methods can enable rigorous results via conjecture generation or verification by reinforcement learning. We survey applications of these techniques-for-rigor ranging from string theory to the smooth 4D Poincaré conjecture in low-dimensional topology. We also discuss connections between machine learning theory and mathematics or theoretical physics such as a new approach to field theory motivated by neural network theory, and a theory of Riemannian metric flows induced by neural network gradient descent, which encompasses Perelman’s formulation of the Ricci flow that was used to solve the 3D Poincaré conjecture. Machine learning techniques may appear ill-suited for application in fields that prioritize rigor and deep understanding; however, they have recently found unexpected uses in theoretical physics and pure mathematics. In this Perspective, Gukov, Halverson and Ruehle have discussed rigorous applications of machine learning to theoretical physics and pure mathematics.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从场论到波恩卡莱猜想,机器学习的严谨性
尽管机器学习技术取得了成功,但它们往往是随机的、容易出错的和黑箱的。那么,如何将它们用于理论物理和纯数学等必须获得无差错结果和深刻理解的领域呢?在本视角中,我们将以理论物理和纯数学为重点,讨论利用机器学习获得零错误结果的技术。非严格方法可以通过猜想生成或强化学习验证获得严格结果。我们考察了这些严谨性技术的应用,范围从弦理论到低维拓扑学中的光滑 4D Poincaré 猜想。我们还讨论了机器学习理论与数学或理论物理学之间的联系,如神经网络理论激发的场论新方法,以及神经网络梯度下降诱导的黎曼度量流理论,其中包含佩雷尔曼用于求解三维波恩卡莱猜想的利玛窦流公式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
47.80
自引率
0.50%
发文量
122
期刊介绍: Nature Reviews Physics is an online-only reviews journal, part of the Nature Reviews portfolio of journals. It publishes high-quality technical reference, review, and commentary articles in all areas of fundamental and applied physics. The journal offers a range of content types, including Reviews, Perspectives, Roadmaps, Technical Reviews, Expert Recommendations, Comments, Editorials, Research Highlights, Features, and News & Views, which cover significant advances in the field and topical issues. Nature Reviews Physics is published monthly from January 2019 and does not have external, academic editors. Instead, all editorial decisions are made by a dedicated team of full-time professional editors.
期刊最新文献
Science should inspire, but visions need nuance The AI revolution is always just out of reach The promise and peril of sociotechnical visions of the future Publisher Correction: Rydberg states of alkali atoms in atomic vapour as SI-traceable field probes and communications receivers Physics and the empirical gap of trustworthy AI
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1