Comparative Study of Electrically Assisted Pressure Joining of Aluminum 6061-T6 Alloys and Copper C11000 Alloys

IF 5.3 3区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology Pub Date : 2024-04-10 DOI:10.1007/s40684-024-00617-9
Tu-Anh Bui-Thi, Thanh Thuong Do, Shengwei Zhang, Yijae Kim, Heung Nam Han, Sung-Tae Hong
{"title":"Comparative Study of Electrically Assisted Pressure Joining of Aluminum 6061-T6 Alloys and Copper C11000 Alloys","authors":"Tu-Anh Bui-Thi, Thanh Thuong Do, Shengwei Zhang, Yijae Kim, Heung Nam Han, Sung-Tae Hong","doi":"10.1007/s40684-024-00617-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study compares the electrically assisted pressure joining (EAPJ) performances of two non-ferrous alloys, aluminum (Al) 6061-T6 and copper (Cu) C11000. For joining, two cylindrical specimens with identical geometries are assembled in a longitudinal direction. Electric currents with various electric current densities are applied directly to the specimen assemblies during continuous axial plastic deformation. Microstructural analysis confirms that the joints are successfully fabricated without melting and solidification in both material combinations. While the mechanical properties of the joints are strongly affected by the electric current density, the results also show that both joining temperature and amount of plastic deformation for successful EAPJ of the C11000 alloy are much lower than those of the Al 6061-T6 alloy. In EAPJ, the Cu C11000 even can be joined at a temperature (250 °C) lower than the 0.3–0.7T<sub>m</sub> range (T<sub>m</sub>: the melting temperature of material), while the Al 6061-T6 requires the joining temperature (450 °C), which is about 0.7T<sub>m</sub> for that material. The present study confirms that the process parameters for successful EAPJ can strongly differ depending on the metal alloy.</p>","PeriodicalId":14238,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology","volume":"58 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40684-024-00617-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study compares the electrically assisted pressure joining (EAPJ) performances of two non-ferrous alloys, aluminum (Al) 6061-T6 and copper (Cu) C11000. For joining, two cylindrical specimens with identical geometries are assembled in a longitudinal direction. Electric currents with various electric current densities are applied directly to the specimen assemblies during continuous axial plastic deformation. Microstructural analysis confirms that the joints are successfully fabricated without melting and solidification in both material combinations. While the mechanical properties of the joints are strongly affected by the electric current density, the results also show that both joining temperature and amount of plastic deformation for successful EAPJ of the C11000 alloy are much lower than those of the Al 6061-T6 alloy. In EAPJ, the Cu C11000 even can be joined at a temperature (250 °C) lower than the 0.3–0.7Tm range (Tm: the melting temperature of material), while the Al 6061-T6 requires the joining temperature (450 °C), which is about 0.7Tm for that material. The present study confirms that the process parameters for successful EAPJ can strongly differ depending on the metal alloy.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
铝 6061-T6 合金与铜 C11000 合金的电辅助压力接合对比研究
本研究比较了铝(Al)6061-T6 和铜(Cu)C11000 这两种有色金属合金的电辅助压力连接(EAPJ)性能。连接时,两个几何形状完全相同的圆柱形试样沿纵向组装在一起。在连续轴向塑性变形过程中,将不同电流密度的电流直接施加到试样组件上。微观结构分析证实,在两种材料组合中都能成功制造出无熔化和凝固的接头。虽然接头的机械性能受电流密度的影响很大,但结果也表明,C11000 合金成功 EAPJ 的连接温度和塑性变形量都远远低于 Al 6061-T6 合金。在 EAPJ 中,Cu C11000 甚至可以在低于 0.3-0.7Tm 范围(Tm:材料的熔化温度)的温度(250 ℃)下连接,而 Al 6061-T6 需要的连接温度(450 ℃)约为该材料的 0.7Tm。本研究证实,成功 EAPJ 的工艺参数会因金属合金的不同而有很大差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
9.50%
发文量
65
审稿时长
5.3 months
期刊介绍: Green Technology aspects of precision engineering and manufacturing are becoming ever more important in current and future technologies. New knowledge in this field will aid in the advancement of various technologies that are needed to gain industrial competitiveness. To this end IJPEM - Green Technology aims to disseminate relevant developments and applied research works of high quality to the international community through efficient and rapid publication. IJPEM - Green Technology covers novel research contributions in all aspects of "Green" precision engineering and manufacturing.
期刊最新文献
Online Vibration Detection in High-Speed Robotic Milling Process Based on Wavelet Energy Entropy of Acoustic Emission The Abrasion Robotic Solutions: A review Integration of Cu-Doped TiO2 Nanoparticles on High Surface UV-Laser-Induced Graphene for Enhanced Photodegradation, De-icing, and Anti-bacterial Surface Applications Flux Filling Rate Effect on Weld Bead Deposition of Recycled Titanium Chip Tubular Wire Bipolar Current Collectors of Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer for Laminates of Structural Battery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1