EXPRESS: Hybrid governance of digital platforms: Exploring complementarities and tensions in the governance of peer relationships

IF 5.2 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Strategic Organization Pub Date : 2024-04-03 DOI:10.1177/14761270241246603
Yaomin Zhang, Jonatan Pinkse, Andrew McMeekin
{"title":"EXPRESS: Hybrid governance of digital platforms: Exploring complementarities and tensions in the governance of peer relationships","authors":"Yaomin Zhang, Jonatan Pinkse, Andrew McMeekin","doi":"10.1177/14761270241246603","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"How do platforms integrate governance mechanisms that promote inherently distinct rules and incentives to manage peer relationships? Digital platforms combine market and community-based mechanisms to govern peer-to-peer interactions for value creation. However, these governance mechanisms play unique roles and interact in distinctive ways, thus shaping how platforms can leverage them for the governance of peer relationships. Through an analysis of sharing platforms, we identify under what conditions particular couplings of market and community mechanisms facilitate a stable governance configuration. We uncover how platforms leverage complementarities and avoid tensions among a set of core and elaborating governance mechanisms. The findings show that market and community mechanisms and their interactions constrain platform governance in different ways. When platforms have strong commercial identities and offerings, implement strict assurance instruments, or develop strong social institutions, they confine core mechanisms to a single governance structure and prevent innovative configurations. However, under specific conditions, platforms explore complementarities between market and community mechanisms which leads to either mixed or highly mixed governance configurations. The study uncovers platforms’ possibilities and constraints in developing stable governance configurations which hybridize market and community mechanisms.","PeriodicalId":22087,"journal":{"name":"Strategic Organization","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Strategic Organization","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14761270241246603","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

How do platforms integrate governance mechanisms that promote inherently distinct rules and incentives to manage peer relationships? Digital platforms combine market and community-based mechanisms to govern peer-to-peer interactions for value creation. However, these governance mechanisms play unique roles and interact in distinctive ways, thus shaping how platforms can leverage them for the governance of peer relationships. Through an analysis of sharing platforms, we identify under what conditions particular couplings of market and community mechanisms facilitate a stable governance configuration. We uncover how platforms leverage complementarities and avoid tensions among a set of core and elaborating governance mechanisms. The findings show that market and community mechanisms and their interactions constrain platform governance in different ways. When platforms have strong commercial identities and offerings, implement strict assurance instruments, or develop strong social institutions, they confine core mechanisms to a single governance structure and prevent innovative configurations. However, under specific conditions, platforms explore complementarities between market and community mechanisms which leads to either mixed or highly mixed governance configurations. The study uncovers platforms’ possibilities and constraints in developing stable governance configurations which hybridize market and community mechanisms.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
表达:数字平台的混合治理:探索同伴关系管理中的互补性和紧张关系
平台如何整合治理机制,促进固有的不同规则和激励机制来管理同伴关系?数字平台结合了基于市场和社区的机制来管理点对点互动,从而创造价值。然而,这些治理机制发挥着独特的作用,并以独特的方式相互作用,从而决定了平台如何利用它们来治理同伴关系。通过对共享平台的分析,我们确定了市场机制和社区机制的特定组合在什么条件下有利于形成稳定的治理结构。我们揭示了平台如何利用互补性,并避免一系列核心和详细治理机制之间的紧张关系。研究结果表明,市场机制和社区机制及其相互作用以不同的方式制约着平台治理。当平台拥有强大的商业身份和产品、实施严格的保障手段或发展强大的社会机构时,它们会将核心机制限制在单一的治理结构中,并阻止创新配置。然而,在特定条件下,平台会探索市场机制和社区机制之间的互补性,从而形成混合或高度混合的治理配置。本研究揭示了平台在发展混合市场机制和社区机制的稳定治理配置方面的可能性和制约因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
8.20%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: Strategic Organization is devoted to publishing high-quality, peer-reviewed, discipline-grounded conceptual and empirical research of interest to researchers, teachers, students, and practitioners of strategic management and organization. The journal also aims to be of considerable interest to senior managers in government, industry, and particularly the growing management consulting industry. Strategic Organization provides an international, interdisciplinary forum designed to improve our understanding of the interrelated dynamics of strategic and organizational processes and outcomes.
期刊最新文献
EXPRESS: Researchers convening dialogue to address grand challenges: Affordances, tensions, and the shift to deep dialogue EXPRESS: From Seller to Broker: When and How Issue Sellers Engage with External Stakeholders to Sell Issues Inside Organizations EXPRESS: Reflections on Deep Academic-Practitioner Partnering for Generative Societal Impact EXPRESS: Communities for impact: Empowering early-career researchers in the pursuit of impact EXPRESS: The increasing value of status in low-performing organizations: Evidence from the video game industry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1