Runoff modeling with various unit-hydrograph approaches for Sarada river basin, India

IF 1.827 Q2 Earth and Planetary Sciences Arabian Journal of Geosciences Pub Date : 2024-04-11 DOI:10.1007/s12517-024-11951-2
Ganapathi Dandupati, Suryanarayana Chodavarapu, Ramesh Naidu Chalumuri, Ajay Ahirwar
{"title":"Runoff modeling with various unit-hydrograph approaches for Sarada river basin, India","authors":"Ganapathi Dandupati, Suryanarayana Chodavarapu, Ramesh Naidu Chalumuri, Ajay Ahirwar","doi":"10.1007/s12517-024-11951-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Hydrological studies of river basins are necessary for sustainable planning and management of drinking and irrigation water supplies. Continuous rainfall-runoff HEC-HMS models require the selection of loss and transform methods. The soil moisture accounting (SMA) loss approach is more prevalent since it can reflect water movement in wet and dry conditions. However, the transform method for a basin should be chosen based on the model’s accuracy in replicating observed flows. The present study is aimed at developing the continuous rainfall-runoff HEC-HMS model for the Sarada river basin in India using SMA as the loss method and to suggest the best transform method by assessing the performance of three distinct unit hydrograph (UH) transform methods (SCS-UH, Clark-UH, and Snyder-UH). The SMA parameters for each transform method were optimized using the built-in optimization trail manager and observed river flow data from the three existing reservoirs (Raiwad, Konam, and Pedderu). Each model reach was routed using the Muskingum method, and the linear reservoir approach was used to compute percolation losses. The Hargreaves method was used to estimate evapotranspiration. Model calibration and validation were performed for the years 2009–18 and 2019–20, respectively, using observed river flow data and Mandal-level meteorological data. Sensitivity analysis conducted on SMA loss parameters showed that the maximum infiltration rate and maximum impervious parameters were the most sensitive. Results indicate that the performances of the SCS-UH transform method are superior to other methods for all three reservoirs. During model validation, when compared to the Snyder-UH and Clark-UH techniques, the SCS-UH method reduced root mean square error by 59% and 26% for the Raiwada, 12% and 10% for the Konam, and 19% and 19% for the Pedderu reservoirs, respectively. The model can be used to predict floods in the river basin’s downstream region and plan water conservation infrastructure.</p>","PeriodicalId":476,"journal":{"name":"Arabian Journal of Geosciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8270,"publicationDate":"2024-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arabian Journal of Geosciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-024-11951-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hydrological studies of river basins are necessary for sustainable planning and management of drinking and irrigation water supplies. Continuous rainfall-runoff HEC-HMS models require the selection of loss and transform methods. The soil moisture accounting (SMA) loss approach is more prevalent since it can reflect water movement in wet and dry conditions. However, the transform method for a basin should be chosen based on the model’s accuracy in replicating observed flows. The present study is aimed at developing the continuous rainfall-runoff HEC-HMS model for the Sarada river basin in India using SMA as the loss method and to suggest the best transform method by assessing the performance of three distinct unit hydrograph (UH) transform methods (SCS-UH, Clark-UH, and Snyder-UH). The SMA parameters for each transform method were optimized using the built-in optimization trail manager and observed river flow data from the three existing reservoirs (Raiwad, Konam, and Pedderu). Each model reach was routed using the Muskingum method, and the linear reservoir approach was used to compute percolation losses. The Hargreaves method was used to estimate evapotranspiration. Model calibration and validation were performed for the years 2009–18 and 2019–20, respectively, using observed river flow data and Mandal-level meteorological data. Sensitivity analysis conducted on SMA loss parameters showed that the maximum infiltration rate and maximum impervious parameters were the most sensitive. Results indicate that the performances of the SCS-UH transform method are superior to other methods for all three reservoirs. During model validation, when compared to the Snyder-UH and Clark-UH techniques, the SCS-UH method reduced root mean square error by 59% and 26% for the Raiwada, 12% and 10% for the Konam, and 19% and 19% for the Pedderu reservoirs, respectively. The model can be used to predict floods in the river basin’s downstream region and plan water conservation infrastructure.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
采用各种单位水文方法为印度萨拉达河流域建立径流模型
流域水文研究对于饮用水和灌溉水供应的可持续规划和管理十分必要。连续降雨-径流 HEC-HMS 模型需要选择损失和转换方法。土壤水分核算(SMA)损失法更为普遍,因为它可以反映干湿条件下的水流运动。然而,流域的转换方法应根据模型复制观测流量的准确性来选择。本研究旨在使用 SMA 作为损失方法,为印度 Sarada 河流域开发连续降雨-径流 HEC-HMS 模型,并通过评估三种不同的单位水文图(UH)变换方法(SCS-UH、Clark-UH 和 Snyder-UH)的性能,提出最佳变换方法。利用内置的优化路径管理器和现有三个水库(Raiwad、Konam 和 Pedderu)的观测河流流量数据,对每种变换方法的 SMA 参数进行了优化。每个模型河段都采用了马斯金库姆法,并使用线性水库法计算渗流损失。哈格里夫斯法用于估算蒸散量。利用观测到的河流流量数据和曼达尔级气象数据,分别对 2009-18 年和 2019-20 年的模型进行了校准和验证。对 SMA 损失参数进行的敏感性分析表明,最大入渗率和最大不透水参数最为敏感。结果表明,在所有三个水库中,SCS-UH 变换方法的性能均优于其他方法。在模型验证过程中,与 Snyder-UH 和 Clark-UH 技术相比,SCS-UH 方法在 Raiwada 水库、Konam 水库和 Pedderu 水库的均方根误差分别减少了 59% 和 26%、12% 和 10%、19% 和 19%。该模型可用于预测流域下游地区的洪水和规划水利基础设施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Arabian Journal of Geosciences
Arabian Journal of Geosciences GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1587
审稿时长
6.7 months
期刊介绍: The Arabian Journal of Geosciences is the official journal of the Saudi Society for Geosciences and publishes peer-reviewed original and review articles on the entire range of Earth Science themes, focused on, but not limited to, those that have regional significance to the Middle East and the Euro-Mediterranean Zone. Key topics therefore include; geology, hydrogeology, earth system science, petroleum sciences, geophysics, seismology and crustal structures, tectonics, sedimentology, palaeontology, metamorphic and igneous petrology, natural hazards, environmental sciences and sustainable development, geoarchaeology, geomorphology, paleo-environment studies, oceanography, atmospheric sciences, GIS and remote sensing, geodesy, mineralogy, volcanology, geochemistry and metallogenesis.
期刊最新文献
Senegalo-Mauritanian basin: a new emerging oil and gas province in the West African passive margin Patterns of indicators of climate change for three different decades in Australia Assessment of wastes used as gabion filling for lining works of a river located in Brazil An integrated analysis of aeromagnetic and PRISMA hyperspectral imagery data for potential gold mineralization exploration in Mwanza, Malawi Effect analysis of copper and brass electrodes on the electroosmotic flow in high saline soil
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1