Hiroyuki Yamamoto, Hiroyuki Arai, Ritsuko Oikawa, Kumiko Umemoto, Hiroyuki Takeda, Takuro Mizukami, Yohei Kubota, Ayako Doi, Yoshiki Horie, Takashi Ogura, Naoki Izawa, Jay A. Moore, Ethan S. Sokol, Yu Sunakawa
{"title":"The Molecular Landscape of Gastric Cancers for Novel Targeted Therapies from Real-World Genomic Profiling","authors":"Hiroyuki Yamamoto, Hiroyuki Arai, Ritsuko Oikawa, Kumiko Umemoto, Hiroyuki Takeda, Takuro Mizukami, Yohei Kubota, Ayako Doi, Yoshiki Horie, Takashi Ogura, Naoki Izawa, Jay A. Moore, Ethan S. Sokol, Yu Sunakawa","doi":"10.1007/s11523-024-01052-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background</h3><p>Panel-based comprehensive genomic profiling is used in clinical practice worldwide; however, large real-world datasets of patients with advanced gastric cancer are not well known.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Objective</h3><p>We investigated what differences exist in clinically relevant alterations for molecularly defined or age-stratified subgroups.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>This was a collaborative biomarker study of a real-world dataset from comprehensive genomic profiling testing (Foundation Medicine, Inc.). Hybrid capture was carried out on at least 324 cancer-related genes and select introns from 31 genes frequently rearranged in cancer. Overall, 4634 patients were available for analyses and were stratified by age (≥ 40/< 40 years), microsatellite instability status, tumor mutational burden status (high 10 ≥ /low < 10 Muts/Mb), Epstein–Barr virus status, and select gene alterations. We analyzed the frequency of alterations with a chi-square test with Yate’s correction.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Genes with frequent alterations included <i>TP53</i> (60.1%), <i>ARID1A</i> (19.6%), <i>CDKN2A</i> (18.2%), <i>KRAS</i> (16.6%), and <i>CDH1</i> (15.8%). Differences in comprehensive genomic profiling were observed according to molecularly defined or age-stratified subgroups. Druggable genomic alterations were detected in 31.4% of patients; <i>ATM</i> (4.4%), <i>BRAF</i> V600E (0.4%), <i>BRCA1</i> (1.5%), <i>BRCA2</i> (2.9%), <i>ERBB2</i> amplification (9.2%), <i>IDH1</i> (0.2%), <i>KRAS</i> G12C (0.7%), microsatellite instability-high (4.8%), <i>NTRK1/2/3</i> fusion (0.13%), <i>PIK3CA</i> mutation (11.4%), and tumor mutational burden-high (9.4%). <i>CDH1</i> alterations and <i>MET</i> amplification were significantly more frequent in patients aged < 40 years (27.7 and 6.2%) than in those aged ≥ 40 years (14.7 and 4.0%).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>Real-world datasets from clinical panel testing revealed the genomic landscape in gastric cancer by subgroup. These findings provide insights for the current therapeutic strategies and future development of treatments in gastric cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":22195,"journal":{"name":"Targeted Oncology","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Targeted Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11523-024-01052-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Panel-based comprehensive genomic profiling is used in clinical practice worldwide; however, large real-world datasets of patients with advanced gastric cancer are not well known.
Objective
We investigated what differences exist in clinically relevant alterations for molecularly defined or age-stratified subgroups.
Methods
This was a collaborative biomarker study of a real-world dataset from comprehensive genomic profiling testing (Foundation Medicine, Inc.). Hybrid capture was carried out on at least 324 cancer-related genes and select introns from 31 genes frequently rearranged in cancer. Overall, 4634 patients were available for analyses and were stratified by age (≥ 40/< 40 years), microsatellite instability status, tumor mutational burden status (high 10 ≥ /low < 10 Muts/Mb), Epstein–Barr virus status, and select gene alterations. We analyzed the frequency of alterations with a chi-square test with Yate’s correction.
Results
Genes with frequent alterations included TP53 (60.1%), ARID1A (19.6%), CDKN2A (18.2%), KRAS (16.6%), and CDH1 (15.8%). Differences in comprehensive genomic profiling were observed according to molecularly defined or age-stratified subgroups. Druggable genomic alterations were detected in 31.4% of patients; ATM (4.4%), BRAF V600E (0.4%), BRCA1 (1.5%), BRCA2 (2.9%), ERBB2 amplification (9.2%), IDH1 (0.2%), KRAS G12C (0.7%), microsatellite instability-high (4.8%), NTRK1/2/3 fusion (0.13%), PIK3CA mutation (11.4%), and tumor mutational burden-high (9.4%). CDH1 alterations and MET amplification were significantly more frequent in patients aged < 40 years (27.7 and 6.2%) than in those aged ≥ 40 years (14.7 and 4.0%).
Conclusions
Real-world datasets from clinical panel testing revealed the genomic landscape in gastric cancer by subgroup. These findings provide insights for the current therapeutic strategies and future development of treatments in gastric cancer.
期刊介绍:
Targeted Oncology addresses physicians and scientists committed to oncology and cancer research by providing a programme of articles on molecularly targeted pharmacotherapy in oncology. The journal includes:
Original Research Articles on all aspects of molecularly targeted agents for the treatment of cancer, including immune checkpoint inhibitors and related approaches.
Comprehensive narrative Review Articles and shorter Leading Articles discussing relevant clinically established as well as emerging agents and pathways.
Current Opinion articles that place interesting areas in perspective.
Therapy in Practice articles that provide a guide to the optimum management of a condition and highlight practical, clinically relevant considerations and recommendations.
Systematic Reviews that use explicit, systematic methods as outlined by the PRISMA statement.
Adis Drug Reviews of the properties and place in therapy of both newer and established targeted drugs in oncology.