Variant effect predictors: a systematic review and practical guide

IF 3.8 2区 生物学 Q2 GENETICS & HEREDITY Human Genetics Pub Date : 2024-04-04 DOI:10.1007/s00439-024-02670-5
Cristian Riccio, Max L. Jansen, Linlin Guo, Andreas Ziegler
{"title":"Variant effect predictors: a systematic review and practical guide","authors":"Cristian Riccio, Max L. Jansen, Linlin Guo, Andreas Ziegler","doi":"10.1007/s00439-024-02670-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Large-scale association analyses using whole-genome sequence data have become feasible, but understanding the functional impacts of these associations remains challenging. Although many tools are available to predict the functional impacts of genetic variants, it is unclear which tool should be used in practice. This work provides a practical guide to assist in selecting appropriate tools for variant annotation. We conducted a MEDLINE search up to November 10, 2023, and included tools that are applicable to a broad range of phenotypes, can be used locally, and have been recently updated. Tools were categorized based on the types of variants they accept and the functional impacts they predict. Sequence Ontology terms were used for standardization. We identified 118 databases and software packages, encompassing 36 variant types and 161 functional impacts. Combining only three tools, namely SnpEff, FAVOR, and SparkINFERNO, allows predicting 99 (61%) distinct functional impacts. Thirty-seven tools predict 89 functional impacts that are not supported by any other tool, while 75 tools predict pathogenicity and can be used within the ACMG/AMP guidelines in a clinical context. We launched a website allowing researchers to select tools based on desired variants and impacts. In summary, more than 100 tools are already available to predict approximately 160 functional impacts. About 60% of the functional impacts can be predicted by the combination of three tools. Unexpectedly, recent tools do not predict more impacts than older ones. Future research should allow predicting the functionality of so far unsupported variant types, such as gene fusions.</p><p>URL: https://cardio-care.shinyapps.io/VEP_Finder/.</p><p>Registration: OSF Registries on November 10, 2023, https://osf.io/s2gct.</p>","PeriodicalId":13175,"journal":{"name":"Human Genetics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00439-024-02670-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Large-scale association analyses using whole-genome sequence data have become feasible, but understanding the functional impacts of these associations remains challenging. Although many tools are available to predict the functional impacts of genetic variants, it is unclear which tool should be used in practice. This work provides a practical guide to assist in selecting appropriate tools for variant annotation. We conducted a MEDLINE search up to November 10, 2023, and included tools that are applicable to a broad range of phenotypes, can be used locally, and have been recently updated. Tools were categorized based on the types of variants they accept and the functional impacts they predict. Sequence Ontology terms were used for standardization. We identified 118 databases and software packages, encompassing 36 variant types and 161 functional impacts. Combining only three tools, namely SnpEff, FAVOR, and SparkINFERNO, allows predicting 99 (61%) distinct functional impacts. Thirty-seven tools predict 89 functional impacts that are not supported by any other tool, while 75 tools predict pathogenicity and can be used within the ACMG/AMP guidelines in a clinical context. We launched a website allowing researchers to select tools based on desired variants and impacts. In summary, more than 100 tools are already available to predict approximately 160 functional impacts. About 60% of the functional impacts can be predicted by the combination of three tools. Unexpectedly, recent tools do not predict more impacts than older ones. Future research should allow predicting the functionality of so far unsupported variant types, such as gene fusions.

URL: https://cardio-care.shinyapps.io/VEP_Finder/.

Registration: OSF Registries on November 10, 2023, https://osf.io/s2gct.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
变异效应预测因子:系统回顾与实用指南
利用全基因组序列数据进行大规模关联分析已变得可行,但了解这些关联的功能影响仍具有挑战性。虽然有很多工具可用于预测遗传变异的功能影响,但目前还不清楚在实践中应使用哪种工具。这项工作提供了一个实用指南,以帮助选择合适的变异注释工具。我们对截至 2023 年 11 月 10 日的 MEDLINE 进行了检索,并纳入了适用于广泛表型、可在本地使用且最近已更新的工具。工具根据其接受的变异类型和预测的功能影响进行分类。序列本体术语用于标准化。我们确定了 118 个数据库和软件包,涵盖 36 种变异类型和 161 种功能影响。仅结合 SnpEff、FAVOR 和 SparkINFERNO 这三种工具,就能预测 99 种(61%)不同的功能影响。37种工具预测了89种其他工具不支持的功能影响,75种工具预测了致病性,可在ACMG/AMP指南的临床背景下使用。我们推出了一个网站,允许研究人员根据所需的变异和影响选择工具。总之,目前已有 100 多种工具可用于预测约 160 种功能影响。大约 60% 的功能影响可以通过三种工具的组合来预测。出乎意料的是,新工具预测的影响并不比旧工具多。未来的研究应该能够预测迄今为止尚不支持的变体类型的功能,如基因融合。网址:https://cardio-care.shinyapps.io/VEP_Finder/.Registration:OSF Registries on November 10, 2023, https://osf.io/s2gct.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Human Genetics
Human Genetics 生物-遗传学
CiteScore
10.80
自引率
3.80%
发文量
94
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Human Genetics is a monthly journal publishing original and timely articles on all aspects of human genetics. The Journal particularly welcomes articles in the areas of Behavioral genetics, Bioinformatics, Cancer genetics and genomics, Cytogenetics, Developmental genetics, Disease association studies, Dysmorphology, ELSI (ethical, legal and social issues), Evolutionary genetics, Gene expression, Gene structure and organization, Genetics of complex diseases and epistatic interactions, Genetic epidemiology, Genome biology, Genome structure and organization, Genotype-phenotype relationships, Human Genomics, Immunogenetics and genomics, Linkage analysis and genetic mapping, Methods in Statistical Genetics, Molecular diagnostics, Mutation detection and analysis, Neurogenetics, Physical mapping and Population Genetics. Articles reporting animal models relevant to human biology or disease are also welcome. Preference will be given to those articles which address clinically relevant questions or which provide new insights into human biology. Unless reporting entirely novel and unusual aspects of a topic, clinical case reports, cytogenetic case reports, papers on descriptive population genetics, articles dealing with the frequency of polymorphisms or additional mutations within genes in which numerous lesions have already been described, and papers that report meta-analyses of previously published datasets will normally not be accepted. The Journal typically will not consider for publication manuscripts that report merely the isolation, map position, structure, and tissue expression profile of a gene of unknown function unless the gene is of particular interest or is a candidate gene involved in a human trait or disorder.
期刊最新文献
Integrative genomic analyses identify neuroblastoma risk genes involved in neuronal differentiation. VCAT: an integrated variant function annotation tools. Structure-informed protein language models are robust predictors for variant effects. Assessing predictions on fitness effects of missense variants in HMBS in CAGI6. GBF1 deficiency causes cataracts in human and mouse.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1