Neuropsychological functioning and its correlates at 1 year follow‐up of severe COVID‐19

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Psychogeriatrics Pub Date : 2024-04-05 DOI:10.1111/psyg.13113
Ana Costas‐Carrera, Marta Mónica Sánchez‐Rodríguez, Antonio Ojeda, Manuel Arturo Rodríguez‐Rey, Inés Martín‐Villalba, Mireia Primé‐Tous, Francisco Valdesoiro‐Pulido, Xavier Segú, Roger Borras, Derek Clougher, Josep Maria Peri, Eduard Vieta
{"title":"Neuropsychological functioning and its correlates at 1 year follow‐up of severe COVID‐19","authors":"Ana Costas‐Carrera, Marta Mónica Sánchez‐Rodríguez, Antonio Ojeda, Manuel Arturo Rodríguez‐Rey, Inés Martín‐Villalba, Mireia Primé‐Tous, Francisco Valdesoiro‐Pulido, Xavier Segú, Roger Borras, Derek Clougher, Josep Maria Peri, Eduard Vieta","doi":"10.1111/psyg.13113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BackgroundShort‐term cognitive impairment is associated with SARS‐CoV‐2 infection but the long‐term impact is yet to be examined in detail. We aim to study the evolution of these symptoms in severe COVID‐19 patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) between April and December 2020 1 year after hospital discharge and to analyze its clinical correlates.MethodA total of 58 patients agreed to participate in the 6 months follow‐up and 30 at 1 year after hospital discharge. Demographic, clinical and laboratory data were collected and a comprehensive neuropsychological battery including validated tests for the main cognitive domains was administered. To test the magnitude of neurocognitive sequelae, two standard deviations below normative group were considered. To compare the neuropsychological performance at 6 and 12 months follow‐up we used repeated measures tests. Finally, regression analyses were performed to test the main effects of medical and psychological factors on multiple cognition.ResultsAlmost half of the sample continued to have impaired performance on neuropsychological tests at 12 months follow‐up. In comparison with the results obtained at 6 months, significant improvements were found in immediate recall (<jats:italic>d</jats:italic> = 0.49), delayed recall (<jats:italic>d</jats:italic> = 0.45), and inhibitory control (<jats:italic>d</jats:italic> = 0.53). Medical variables predicted cognitive performance at 6 months but not at 12 months follow‐up, while anxiety and depression predicted cognitive deficits in the long‐term.ConclusionsA generalised improvement was observed in severe COVID‐19 patients at follow‐up. This improvement was particularly notable in verbal memory and executive functioning. However, a considerable proportion of the sample continued to present deficits at 1 year follow‐up.","PeriodicalId":20784,"journal":{"name":"Psychogeriatrics","volume":"65 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychogeriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/psyg.13113","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundShort‐term cognitive impairment is associated with SARS‐CoV‐2 infection but the long‐term impact is yet to be examined in detail. We aim to study the evolution of these symptoms in severe COVID‐19 patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) between April and December 2020 1 year after hospital discharge and to analyze its clinical correlates.MethodA total of 58 patients agreed to participate in the 6 months follow‐up and 30 at 1 year after hospital discharge. Demographic, clinical and laboratory data were collected and a comprehensive neuropsychological battery including validated tests for the main cognitive domains was administered. To test the magnitude of neurocognitive sequelae, two standard deviations below normative group were considered. To compare the neuropsychological performance at 6 and 12 months follow‐up we used repeated measures tests. Finally, regression analyses were performed to test the main effects of medical and psychological factors on multiple cognition.ResultsAlmost half of the sample continued to have impaired performance on neuropsychological tests at 12 months follow‐up. In comparison with the results obtained at 6 months, significant improvements were found in immediate recall (d = 0.49), delayed recall (d = 0.45), and inhibitory control (d = 0.53). Medical variables predicted cognitive performance at 6 months but not at 12 months follow‐up, while anxiety and depression predicted cognitive deficits in the long‐term.ConclusionsA generalised improvement was observed in severe COVID‐19 patients at follow‐up. This improvement was particularly notable in verbal memory and executive functioning. However, a considerable proportion of the sample continued to present deficits at 1 year follow‐up.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
严重 COVID-19 患者 1 年随访的神经心理功能及其相关因素
背景短期认知障碍与 SARS-CoV-2 感染有关,但其长期影响尚未得到详细研究。我们旨在研究 2020 年 4 月至 12 月期间入住重症监护室(ICU)的严重 COVID-19 患者在出院 1 年后这些症状的演变情况,并分析其临床相关性。研究人员收集了患者的人口统计学、临床和实验室数据,并进行了全面的神经心理学测试,包括主要认知领域的有效测试。为了测试神经认知后遗症的严重程度,考虑了低于常模组两个标准差的情况。为了比较随访 6 个月和 12 个月时的神经心理学表现,我们使用了重复测量测试。最后,我们进行了回归分析,以检验医疗和心理因素对多重认知的主要影响。结果在随访 12 个月时,几乎一半的样本在神经心理学测试中的表现仍然受损。与 6 个月时的结果相比,即时回忆(d = 0.49)、延迟回忆(d = 0.45)和抑制控制(d = 0.53)均有显著改善。医疗变量可预测 6 个月的认知表现,但不能预测 12 个月随访时的认知表现,而焦虑和抑郁可预测长期的认知缺陷。结论 COVID-19 重症患者在随访期间的认知能力普遍得到改善,尤其是在言语记忆和执行功能方面。然而,相当一部分样本在随访一年后仍存在认知缺陷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psychogeriatrics
Psychogeriatrics Medicine-Geriatrics and Gerontology
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
115
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Psychogeriatrics is an international journal sponsored by the Japanese Psychogeriatric Society and publishes peer-reviewed original papers dealing with all aspects of psychogeriatrics and related fields The Journal encourages articles with gerontopsychiatric, neurobiological, genetic, diagnostic, social-psychiatric, health-political, psychological or psychotherapeutic content. Themes can be illuminated through basic science, clinical (human and animal) studies, case studies, epidemiological or humanistic research
期刊最新文献
Longitudinal relationship between loneliness and cognitive function among unmarried older adults in Malaysia: exploring gender disparities Low‐dose lamotrigine induces Pisa syndrome in a patient with probable corticobasal degeneration despite previous use Reply to ‘The clinical application value of psychological nursing intervention for patients with prostatic hyperplasia during treatment’ Beyond the stethoscope: ageism in white coats and resident physicians' preferences for elderly patient care Validity and reliability of the Checklist for Habitual Physical Activity for people 75 years and older in Japan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1