Validity and reliability of the Checklist for Habitual Physical Activity for people 75 years and older in Japan

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Psychogeriatrics Pub Date : 2024-09-10 DOI:10.1111/psyg.13189
Kuniko Arita, Yu Ishibashi, Takayuki Tajima, Yoshiaki Ikechi, Hitomi Ishibashi
{"title":"Validity and reliability of the Checklist for Habitual Physical Activity for people 75 years and older in Japan","authors":"Kuniko Arita, Yu Ishibashi, Takayuki Tajima, Yoshiaki Ikechi, Hitomi Ishibashi","doi":"10.1111/psyg.13189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BackgroundDespite health benefits, many older adults struggle to meet physical activity guidelines, leading to stagnant activity levels. While integrating physical activity into daily routines has been proposed as a promising strategy for older adults, fit‐for‐purpose measurement tools to assess such routines are lacking. The Checklist for Habitual Physical Activity (CHaPA) was developed based on the positive deviance approach and socio‐ecological model to assess daily behaviours encouraging physical activity among adults aged 75 and older. It has been confirmed for its content and face validity. However, to ensure its broader applicability and usefulness, assessing its construct validity and reliability is necessary. Therefore, this study aims to assess the construct validity and reliability of the CHaPA and accordingly update the tool.MethodsTo validate the construct validity of the CHaPA 22‐item version, we conducted item analysis and exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. We removed inappropriate items based on predefined criteria. Then, we assessed the reliability, internal consistency, test–retest reliability, and measurement errors of the CHaPA final version.ResultsItem analyses and factor analyses resulted in the deletion of 11 items. The results of confirmatory factor analysis validated the CHaPA 11‐item version with the three‐factor structure based on model fit index with <jats:italic>χ</jats:italic><jats:sup>2</jats:sup>/degree of freedom = 1.25, comparative fit index = 0.965, Tucker‐Lewis index = 0.952, and root‐mean‐square error of approximation = 0.038. Omega coefficient (0.90) showed excellent internal consistency. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) demonstrated good test–retest reliability (ICC (1, 2) = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.34–0.89, standard error of measurement = 1.75).ConclusionsWe finalised the CHaPA 11‐item version as a valid and reliable instrument for assessing daily behaviours conducive to physical activity among individuals aged 75 years and older. We need to examine the methods and effectiveness of disseminating this checklist to ensure its utilisation as a resource for promoting healthy ageing and aiding older adults in maintaining active lifestyles.","PeriodicalId":20784,"journal":{"name":"Psychogeriatrics","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychogeriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/psyg.13189","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundDespite health benefits, many older adults struggle to meet physical activity guidelines, leading to stagnant activity levels. While integrating physical activity into daily routines has been proposed as a promising strategy for older adults, fit‐for‐purpose measurement tools to assess such routines are lacking. The Checklist for Habitual Physical Activity (CHaPA) was developed based on the positive deviance approach and socio‐ecological model to assess daily behaviours encouraging physical activity among adults aged 75 and older. It has been confirmed for its content and face validity. However, to ensure its broader applicability and usefulness, assessing its construct validity and reliability is necessary. Therefore, this study aims to assess the construct validity and reliability of the CHaPA and accordingly update the tool.MethodsTo validate the construct validity of the CHaPA 22‐item version, we conducted item analysis and exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. We removed inappropriate items based on predefined criteria. Then, we assessed the reliability, internal consistency, test–retest reliability, and measurement errors of the CHaPA final version.ResultsItem analyses and factor analyses resulted in the deletion of 11 items. The results of confirmatory factor analysis validated the CHaPA 11‐item version with the three‐factor structure based on model fit index with χ2/degree of freedom = 1.25, comparative fit index = 0.965, Tucker‐Lewis index = 0.952, and root‐mean‐square error of approximation = 0.038. Omega coefficient (0.90) showed excellent internal consistency. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) demonstrated good test–retest reliability (ICC (1, 2) = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.34–0.89, standard error of measurement = 1.75).ConclusionsWe finalised the CHaPA 11‐item version as a valid and reliable instrument for assessing daily behaviours conducive to physical activity among individuals aged 75 years and older. We need to examine the methods and effectiveness of disseminating this checklist to ensure its utilisation as a resource for promoting healthy ageing and aiding older adults in maintaining active lifestyles.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
日本 75 岁及以上老年人习惯性体育活动核对表的有效性和可靠性
背景尽管体育锻炼对健康有益,但许多老年人仍难以达到体育锻炼指南的要求,导致活动量停滞不前。虽然将体育锻炼融入日常生活已被认为是老年人的一项有前途的策略,但目前还缺乏适合的测量工具来评估这种日常生活。习惯性体育锻炼检查表(CHaPA)是根据积极偏差法和社会生态模型开发的,用于评估 75 岁及以上老年人鼓励体育锻炼的日常行为。其内容和表面效度已得到确认。然而,为确保其更广泛的适用性和实用性,有必要对其构造效度和信度进行评估。因此,本研究旨在评估 CHaPA 的建构效度和信度,并据此更新该工具。方法为了验证 CHaPA 22 个项目版本的建构效度,我们进行了项目分析以及探索性和确认性因子分析。我们根据预先设定的标准删除了不合适的项目。然后,我们评估了 CHaPA 最终版本的信度、内部一致性、重测信度和测量误差。根据模型拟合指数(χ2/自由度 = 1.25)、比较拟合指数 = 0.965、Tucker-Lewis 指数 = 0.952 和均方根近似误差 = 0.038,确认性因素分析的结果验证了 CHaPA 11 个项目的三因素结构。欧米茄系数(0.90)显示出极好的内部一致性。类内相关系数(ICC)显示了良好的测试-再测可靠性(ICC (1, 2) = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.34-0.89,测量标准误差 = 1.75)。结论我们最终确定了 CHaPA 11 个项目的版本,它是评估 75 岁及以上老年人有利于体育锻炼的日常行为的有效、可靠的工具。我们需要研究推广该核对表的方法和效果,以确保其成为促进健康老龄化和帮助老年人保持积极生活方式的资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psychogeriatrics
Psychogeriatrics Medicine-Geriatrics and Gerontology
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
115
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Psychogeriatrics is an international journal sponsored by the Japanese Psychogeriatric Society and publishes peer-reviewed original papers dealing with all aspects of psychogeriatrics and related fields The Journal encourages articles with gerontopsychiatric, neurobiological, genetic, diagnostic, social-psychiatric, health-political, psychological or psychotherapeutic content. Themes can be illuminated through basic science, clinical (human and animal) studies, case studies, epidemiological or humanistic research
期刊最新文献
Longitudinal relationship between loneliness and cognitive function among unmarried older adults in Malaysia: exploring gender disparities Low‐dose lamotrigine induces Pisa syndrome in a patient with probable corticobasal degeneration despite previous use Reply to ‘The clinical application value of psychological nursing intervention for patients with prostatic hyperplasia during treatment’ Beyond the stethoscope: ageism in white coats and resident physicians' preferences for elderly patient care Validity and reliability of the Checklist for Habitual Physical Activity for people 75 years and older in Japan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1