Trends in Life Expectancy in Residential Long-Term Care by Sociodemographic Position in 1999–2018: A Multistate Life Table Study of Finnish Older Adults

Kaarina Korhonen, Heta Moustgaard, Michael Murphy, Pekka Martikainen
{"title":"Trends in Life Expectancy in Residential Long-Term Care by Sociodemographic Position in 1999–2018: A Multistate Life Table Study of Finnish Older Adults","authors":"Kaarina Korhonen, Heta Moustgaard, Michael Murphy, Pekka Martikainen","doi":"10.1093/geronb/gbae067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives Residential long-term care (LTC) use has declined in many countries over the past years. This study quantifies how changing rates of entry, exit, and mortality have contributed to trends in life expectancy in LTC (i.e., average time spent in LTC after age 65) across sociodemographic groups. Methods We analyzed population-register data of all Finns aged ≥65 during 1999–2018 (n=2,016,987) with dates of LTC and death, and sociodemographic characteristics. We estimated transition rates between home, LTC and death using Poisson generalized additive models, and calculated multistate life tables across 1999–2003, 2004–2008, 2009–2013 and 2014–2018. Results Between 1999–2003 and 2004–2008, life expectancy in LTC increased from 0.75 (95% CI 0.74–0.76) to 0.89 (0.88–0.90) years among men and from 1.61 (1.59–1.62) to 1.83 (1.81–1.85) years among women, mainly due to declining exit rates from LTC. Thereafter, life expectancy in LTC decreased, reaching 0.80 (0.79–0.81) and 1.51 (1.50–1.53) years among men and women, respectively, in 2014–2018. Especially among women and non-married men, the decline was largely due to increasing death rates in LTC. Admission rates declined throughout the study period, which offset the increase in life expectancy in LTC attributable to declining mortality in the community. Marital status differences in life expectancy in LTC narrowed over time. Discussion Recent declines in LTC use were driven by postponed LTC admission closer to death. The results suggest that across sociodemographic strata older adults enter LTC in ever worse health and spent a shorter time in care than before.","PeriodicalId":501650,"journal":{"name":"The Journals of Gerontology: Series B","volume":"57 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journals of Gerontology: Series B","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbae067","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives Residential long-term care (LTC) use has declined in many countries over the past years. This study quantifies how changing rates of entry, exit, and mortality have contributed to trends in life expectancy in LTC (i.e., average time spent in LTC after age 65) across sociodemographic groups. Methods We analyzed population-register data of all Finns aged ≥65 during 1999–2018 (n=2,016,987) with dates of LTC and death, and sociodemographic characteristics. We estimated transition rates between home, LTC and death using Poisson generalized additive models, and calculated multistate life tables across 1999–2003, 2004–2008, 2009–2013 and 2014–2018. Results Between 1999–2003 and 2004–2008, life expectancy in LTC increased from 0.75 (95% CI 0.74–0.76) to 0.89 (0.88–0.90) years among men and from 1.61 (1.59–1.62) to 1.83 (1.81–1.85) years among women, mainly due to declining exit rates from LTC. Thereafter, life expectancy in LTC decreased, reaching 0.80 (0.79–0.81) and 1.51 (1.50–1.53) years among men and women, respectively, in 2014–2018. Especially among women and non-married men, the decline was largely due to increasing death rates in LTC. Admission rates declined throughout the study period, which offset the increase in life expectancy in LTC attributable to declining mortality in the community. Marital status differences in life expectancy in LTC narrowed over time. Discussion Recent declines in LTC use were driven by postponed LTC admission closer to death. The results suggest that across sociodemographic strata older adults enter LTC in ever worse health and spent a shorter time in care than before.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
1999-2018年按社会人口状况分列的长期住院护理预期寿命趋势:芬兰老年人多州生命表研究
目标 过去几年来,许多国家的住院长期护理(LTC)使用率都有所下降。本研究量化了入院率、出院率和死亡率的变化如何导致不同社会人口群体的长期护理预期寿命(即 65 岁后在长期护理机构度过的平均时间)的变化趋势。方法 我们分析了 1999-2018 年期间所有年龄≥65 岁的芬兰人(n=2,016,987)的人口登记数据,其中包括长期护理和死亡日期以及社会人口特征。我们使用泊松广义加法模型估算了家庭、长期护理和死亡之间的过渡率,并计算了 1999-2003、2004-2008、2009-2013 和 2014-2018 年的多州生命表。结果 在 1999-2003 年和 2004-2008 年期间,男性在长期护理中心的预期寿命从 0.75(95% CI 0.74-0.76)岁增加到 0.89(0.88-0.90)岁,女性从 1.61(1.59-1.62)岁增加到 1.83(1.81-1.85)岁,这主要是由于退出长期护理中心的比率下降。此后,在 2014-2018 年期间,男性和女性在长期护理中的预期寿命有所下降,分别为 0.80(0.79-0.81)岁和 1.51(1.50-1.53)岁。特别是在女性和非婚男性中,这一下降主要是由于在 LTC 中的死亡率不断上升。在整个研究期间,入院率都在下降,这抵消了社区死亡率下降所带来的 LTC 预期寿命的增长。随着时间的推移,婚姻状况在长期护理中心预期寿命方面的差异逐渐缩小。讨论 最近,由于临近死亡时推迟入住长期护理中心,导致长期护理中心使用率下降。研究结果表明,在各个社会人口阶层中,老年人进入长期护理机构的健康状况越来越差,接受护理的时间也比以前短。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Temporary Setback or Lasting Challenge? The Impact of Transient and Persistent Functional disability on later life well-being Context Matters: Internet Usage and Loneliness Among Middle-Aged and Older Adults During the COVID-19 Pandemic Worrying Across the Generations: The Impact of Adult Grandchildren’s Problems on Grandparents’ Well-Being The Relationship Between 10-Year Changes in Cognitive Control Beliefs and Cognitive Performance in Middle and Later Adulthood Improving Memory through Better Sleep in Community-dwelling Older Adults: A Tai Chi Intervention Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1