Attributes influencing guests’ experiences: a comparison of nonprofit and for-profit peer-to-peer accommodation platforms

IF 6.3 3区 管理学 Q1 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM Information Technology & Tourism Pub Date : 2024-04-16 DOI:10.1007/s40558-024-00289-w
Vivian C. Medina-Hernandez, Estela Marine-Roig, Berta Ferrer-Rosell
{"title":"Attributes influencing guests’ experiences: a comparison of nonprofit and for-profit peer-to-peer accommodation platforms","authors":"Vivian C. Medina-Hernandez, Estela Marine-Roig, Berta Ferrer-Rosell","doi":"10.1007/s40558-024-00289-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Peer-to-peer accommodation has generated an ecosystem of platforms with different business models (i.e., for-profit and nonprofit). This study aims to identify and compare attributes that influence guests’ experiences as reviewed on the for-profit platform Airbnb and the nonprofit platforms Couchsurfing.com and HomeExchange.com according to a three-dimensional experience theoretical model and a methodological approach to interpret these attributes. The study used text-mining techniques to analyze 772,768 online travel reviews representing Spain’s four most-visited cities. Findings show that attributes influencing guests’ experiences in the case of nonprofit platforms relate to the authenticity dimension of experience (e.g., existential values and travel philosophy). Furthermore, guests reported that their guest–host interaction was the most representative attribute and that, unlike with Airbnb, such interaction helped to create a more authentic experience. By contrast, attributes of guests’ experiences in the case of for-profit platforms related to the physical amenities and characteristics that guests would expect to find in hotels. Those results can allow destination managers and accommodation practitioners to better understand users of peer-to-peer accommodations and thereby design more suitable strategies and experiences for them.</p>","PeriodicalId":46275,"journal":{"name":"Information Technology & Tourism","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Technology & Tourism","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40558-024-00289-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Peer-to-peer accommodation has generated an ecosystem of platforms with different business models (i.e., for-profit and nonprofit). This study aims to identify and compare attributes that influence guests’ experiences as reviewed on the for-profit platform Airbnb and the nonprofit platforms Couchsurfing.com and HomeExchange.com according to a three-dimensional experience theoretical model and a methodological approach to interpret these attributes. The study used text-mining techniques to analyze 772,768 online travel reviews representing Spain’s four most-visited cities. Findings show that attributes influencing guests’ experiences in the case of nonprofit platforms relate to the authenticity dimension of experience (e.g., existential values and travel philosophy). Furthermore, guests reported that their guest–host interaction was the most representative attribute and that, unlike with Airbnb, such interaction helped to create a more authentic experience. By contrast, attributes of guests’ experiences in the case of for-profit platforms related to the physical amenities and characteristics that guests would expect to find in hotels. Those results can allow destination managers and accommodation practitioners to better understand users of peer-to-peer accommodations and thereby design more suitable strategies and experiences for them.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
影响客人体验的因素:非营利性和营利性点对点住宿平台的比较
点对点住宿产生了一个具有不同商业模式(即营利性和非营利性)的平台生态系统。本研究旨在根据三维体验理论模型和解释这些属性的方法,识别并比较影响客人在营利性平台 Airbnb 和非营利性平台 Couchsurfing.com 和 HomeExchange.com 上的体验的属性。研究使用文本挖掘技术分析了 772 768 条在线旅游评论,这些评论代表了西班牙游客最多的四个城市。研究结果表明,在非营利性平台中,影响游客体验的属性与体验的真实性维度有关(如存在价值和旅游哲学)。此外,客人们还表示,客人与房东的互动是最具代表性的属性,与 Airbnb 不同的是,这种互动有助于创造更真实的体验。相比之下,在营利性平台上,客人的体验属性与客人期望在酒店找到的物质设施和特征有关。这些结果可以让目的地管理者和住宿从业者更好地了解点对点住宿的用户,从而为他们设计更合适的策略和体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Information Technology & Tourism
Information Technology & Tourism HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM-
CiteScore
18.10
自引率
5.40%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: Information Technology & Tourism stands as the pioneer interdisciplinary journal dedicated to exploring the essence and impact of digital technology in tourism, travel, and hospitality. It delves into challenges emerging at the crossroads of IT and the domains of tourism, travel, and hospitality, embracing perspectives from both technical and social sciences. The journal covers a broad spectrum of topics, including but not limited to the development, adoption, use, management, and governance of digital technology. It supports both theory-focused research and studies with direct relevance to the industry.
期刊最新文献
Travelers’ viewpoints on machine translation using Q methodology: a perspective of consumption value theory Solving the tourist trip planning problem with attraction patterns using meta-heuristic techniques Automated photo filtering for tourism domain using deep and active learning: the case of Israeli and worldwide cities on instagram Sequential framework for analyzing mobile click-through decision in online travel agency with user digital footprints The perils of smart technology in museums
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1