Forming Evaluations of Moral Character: How Are Multiple Pieces of Information Prioritized and Integrated?

IF 2.3 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Cognitive Science Pub Date : 2024-04-24 DOI:10.1111/cogs.13443
Justin F. Landy, Alexander D. Perry
{"title":"Forming Evaluations of Moral Character: How Are Multiple Pieces of Information Prioritized and Integrated?","authors":"Justin F. Landy,&nbsp;Alexander D. Perry","doi":"10.1111/cogs.13443","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Evaluating other people's moral character is a crucial social cognitive task. However, the cognitive processes by which people seek out, prioritize, and integrate multiple pieces of character-relevant information have not been studied empirically. The first aim of this research was to examine which character traits are considered most important when forming an impression of a person's overall moral character. The second aim was to understand how differing levels of trait expression affect overall character judgments. Four preregistered studies and one supplemental study (total <i>N</i> = 720), using five different measures of importance and sampling undergraduates, online workers, and community members, found that our participants placed the most importance on the traits <i>honest, helpful, compassionate, loyal</i>, and <i>responsible</i>. Also, when integrating the information that they have learned, our participants seemed to engage in a simple averaging process in which all available, relevant information is combined in a linear fashion to form an overall evaluation of moral character. This research provides new insights into the cognitive processes by which evaluations of moral character are formed.</p>","PeriodicalId":48349,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Science","volume":"48 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Science","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cogs.13443","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Evaluating other people's moral character is a crucial social cognitive task. However, the cognitive processes by which people seek out, prioritize, and integrate multiple pieces of character-relevant information have not been studied empirically. The first aim of this research was to examine which character traits are considered most important when forming an impression of a person's overall moral character. The second aim was to understand how differing levels of trait expression affect overall character judgments. Four preregistered studies and one supplemental study (total N = 720), using five different measures of importance and sampling undergraduates, online workers, and community members, found that our participants placed the most importance on the traits honest, helpful, compassionate, loyal, and responsible. Also, when integrating the information that they have learned, our participants seemed to engage in a simple averaging process in which all available, relevant information is combined in a linear fashion to form an overall evaluation of moral character. This research provides new insights into the cognitive processes by which evaluations of moral character are formed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
形成对道德品质的评价:如何对多种信息进行优先排序和整合?
评价他人的道德品质是一项重要的社会认知任务。然而,人们寻找、优先考虑和整合多种品德相关信息的认知过程尚未得到实证研究。本研究的第一个目的是考察在形成对一个人的整体道德品质的印象时,哪些品格特征被认为是最重要的。第二个目的是了解不同的性格特征表达水平如何影响总体性格判断。四项预先登记的研究和一项补充研究(总人数 = 720)使用了五种不同的重要性测量方法,并对大学生、在线工作者和社区成员进行了抽样调查,结果发现,我们的参与者最重视诚实、乐于助人、富有同情心、忠诚和负责任的特质。此外,在整合所学信息时,我们的参与者似乎参与了一个简单的平均过程,在这个过程中,所有可用的相关信息以线性方式结合起来,形成对道德品质的总体评价。这项研究为道德品质评价形成的认知过程提供了新的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cognitive Science
Cognitive Science PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
8.00%
发文量
139
期刊介绍: Cognitive Science publishes articles in all areas of cognitive science, covering such topics as knowledge representation, inference, memory processes, learning, problem solving, planning, perception, natural language understanding, connectionism, brain theory, motor control, intentional systems, and other areas of interdisciplinary concern. Highest priority is given to research reports that are specifically written for a multidisciplinary audience. The audience is primarily researchers in cognitive science and its associated fields, including anthropologists, education researchers, psychologists, philosophers, linguists, computer scientists, neuroscientists, and roboticists.
期刊最新文献
ACKNOWLEDGING THE GAP WHILE BRIDGING IT: The Experimental Versus Theoretical Divide on the Cognitive Science Study of Language Do You Control Your Unconscious Action Impulses? Composition as Nonlinear Combination in Semantic Space: A Computational Characterization of Compound Processing The Less Meaningful the Understanding, the Faster the Feeling: Speech Comprehension Changes Perceptual Speech Tempo Virtual Partners Improve Synchronization in Human−Machine Trios
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1