The association of healthcare contact days with physical function and survival in CCTG/AGITG CO.17

Arjun Gupta, Christopher J O'Callaghan, Liting Zhu, Derek J Jonker, Ralph P W Wong, Bruce Colwell, Malcolm J Moore, Christos S Karapetis, Niall C Tebbutt, Jeremy D Shapiro, Dongsheng Tu, Christopher M Booth
{"title":"The association of healthcare contact days with physical function and survival in CCTG/AGITG CO.17","authors":"Arjun Gupta, Christopher J O'Callaghan, Liting Zhu, Derek J Jonker, Ralph P W Wong, Bruce Colwell, Malcolm J Moore, Christos S Karapetis, Niall C Tebbutt, Jeremy D Shapiro, Dongsheng Tu, Christopher M Booth","doi":"10.1093/jnci/djae077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction While contact days—days with healthcare contact outside home—are increasingly adopted as a measure of time toxicity and treatment burden, they could also serve as a surrogate of treatment-related harm. We sought to assess the association between contact days and patient-reported outcomes, and the prognostic ability of contact days. Methods We conducted a secondary analysis of CO.17 that evaluated cetuximab vs supportive care in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. CO.17 collected EORTC-QLQ-C30 instrument data. We assessed the association between number of contact days in a window and changes in physical function and global health status, and the association between number of contact days in the first 4 weeks with overall survival (OS). Results There was a negative association between the number of contact days and change in physical function (per each additional contact day at 4 weeks, 1.50 point decrease; and 8 weeks, 1.06 point decrease, p < .0001 for both), but not with global health status. This negative association was seen in patients receiving cetuximab, but not supportive care. More contact days in the first 4 weeks was associated with worse OS for all comers and patients receiving cetuximab (per each additional contact day; all comers, aHR 1.07, 95% CI, 1.05- 1.10; and cetuximab, aHR 1.08, 95%CI 1.05- 1.11, p < .0001 for both). Conclusions In this secondary analysis of a clinical trial, more contact days early in the course was associated with declines in physical function and worse survival in all-comers and in participants receiving cancer-directed treatment. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00079066","PeriodicalId":501635,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Cancer Institute","volume":"164 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the National Cancer Institute","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djae077","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction While contact days—days with healthcare contact outside home—are increasingly adopted as a measure of time toxicity and treatment burden, they could also serve as a surrogate of treatment-related harm. We sought to assess the association between contact days and patient-reported outcomes, and the prognostic ability of contact days. Methods We conducted a secondary analysis of CO.17 that evaluated cetuximab vs supportive care in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. CO.17 collected EORTC-QLQ-C30 instrument data. We assessed the association between number of contact days in a window and changes in physical function and global health status, and the association between number of contact days in the first 4 weeks with overall survival (OS). Results There was a negative association between the number of contact days and change in physical function (per each additional contact day at 4 weeks, 1.50 point decrease; and 8 weeks, 1.06 point decrease, p < .0001 for both), but not with global health status. This negative association was seen in patients receiving cetuximab, but not supportive care. More contact days in the first 4 weeks was associated with worse OS for all comers and patients receiving cetuximab (per each additional contact day; all comers, aHR 1.07, 95% CI, 1.05- 1.10; and cetuximab, aHR 1.08, 95%CI 1.05- 1.11, p < .0001 for both). Conclusions In this secondary analysis of a clinical trial, more contact days early in the course was associated with declines in physical function and worse survival in all-comers and in participants receiving cancer-directed treatment. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00079066
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
CCTG/AGITG CO.17 中医疗保健接触天数与身体功能和存活率的关系
导言:虽然接触天数(在家庭以外接触医疗保健人员的天数)越来越多地被用来衡量时间毒性和治疗负担,但它们也可以作为治疗相关伤害的替代指标。我们试图评估接触天数与患者报告的结果之间的关联,以及接触天数的预后能力。方法 我们对评估晚期结直肠癌患者西妥昔单抗与支持治疗的 CO.17 进行了二次分析。CO.17 收集了 EORTC-QLQ-C30 工具数据。我们评估了窗口期接触天数与身体功能和总体健康状况变化之间的关系,以及前 4 周接触天数与总生存期(OS)之间的关系。结果 接触天数与身体机能的变化呈负相关(每增加一天接触,4 周时身体机能下降 1.50 分;8 周时身体机能下降 1.06 分,两者的 p 均为 0.0001),但与总体健康状况无关。接受西妥昔单抗治疗的患者出现了这种负相关,而接受支持性治疗的患者则没有出现这种负相关。对于所有患者和接受西妥昔单抗治疗的患者而言,前 4 周接触天数越多,OS 越差(每增加一天接触天数;所有患者,aHR 1.07,95%CI 1.05-1.10;西妥昔单抗,aHR 1.08,95%CI 1.05-1.11,两者均为 p &;lt;.0001)。结论 在这项临床试验的二次分析中,对于所有患者和接受癌症导向治疗的参与者来说,病程早期接触天数越多,身体功能越差,生存率越低。临床试验注册号:NCT00079066
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Elevated risk of lung cancer among asian American females who have never smoked: an emerging cancer disparity First Cycle Toxicity and Survival in Patients with Rare Cancers Treated with Checkpoint Inhibitors The Association of Where Patients with Prostate Cancer Live and Receive Care on Racial Treatment Inequities Projected Outcomes of Reduced-Biopsy Management of Grade Group 1 Prostate Cancer: Implications for Relabeling Proinflammatory Dietary Pattern and Risk of Total and Subtypes of Breast Cancer Among U.S. Women
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1