Endocrine therapy and risk of cardiovascular disease and mortality in postmenopausal breast cancer survivors

Yuhan Huang, Marilyn L Kwan, Susan R Heckbert, Nicholas L Smith, Megan Othus, Cecile A Laurent, Janise M Roh, Eileen Rillamas-Sun, Valerie S Lee, Tatjana Kolevska, Richard K Cheng, Carlos Irribarren, Mai Nguyen-Huynh, Dawn L Hershman, Lawrence H Kushi, Heather Greenlee
{"title":"Endocrine therapy and risk of cardiovascular disease and mortality in postmenopausal breast cancer survivors","authors":"Yuhan Huang, Marilyn L Kwan, Susan R Heckbert, Nicholas L Smith, Megan Othus, Cecile A Laurent, Janise M Roh, Eileen Rillamas-Sun, Valerie S Lee, Tatjana Kolevska, Richard K Cheng, Carlos Irribarren, Mai Nguyen-Huynh, Dawn L Hershman, Lawrence H Kushi, Heather Greenlee","doi":"10.1093/jnci/djaf063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background There are increasing concerns of cardiovascular safety related to endocrine therapy use in women with breast cancer (BC). We examined risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) events and mortality associated with endocrine therapy use in postmenopausal women with early-stage BC. Methods Postmenopausal women diagnosed with stage I-III hormone receptor-positive BC from 2005 to 2013 were included (n = 8,495). Women were classified as aromatase inhibitor (AI) users, tamoxifen users, and non-users of endocrine therapy in the 12 months after BC diagnosis. Likelihood ratio tests examined whether the association of endocrine therapy use with CVD and mortality outcomes varied by body mass index (BMI) and history of CVD before BC diagnosis. Results Over a median follow-up of 7.5 years, women who used AIs were less likely to develop major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (HR = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.73-0.97) and heart failure (HR = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.66-0.99) compared with non-users of endocrine therapy. No associations between tamoxifen use and CVD outcomes were observed. AI use was associated with lower risk all-cause, CVD-related, and non-CVD-related mortality, compared with non-use of endocrine therapy. Tamoxifen use was associated with lower risk of all-cause mortality and non-CVD-related mortality, compared with non-use of endocrine therapy, and the association was modified by BMI (P for interaction <0.05). Conclusion Our findings suggest endocrine therapy use reduces all-cause mortality risk and may not increase CVD risk in postmenopausal women with early-stage hormone receptor-positive BC.","PeriodicalId":501635,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Cancer Institute","volume":"54 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the National Cancer Institute","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djaf063","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background There are increasing concerns of cardiovascular safety related to endocrine therapy use in women with breast cancer (BC). We examined risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) events and mortality associated with endocrine therapy use in postmenopausal women with early-stage BC. Methods Postmenopausal women diagnosed with stage I-III hormone receptor-positive BC from 2005 to 2013 were included (n = 8,495). Women were classified as aromatase inhibitor (AI) users, tamoxifen users, and non-users of endocrine therapy in the 12 months after BC diagnosis. Likelihood ratio tests examined whether the association of endocrine therapy use with CVD and mortality outcomes varied by body mass index (BMI) and history of CVD before BC diagnosis. Results Over a median follow-up of 7.5 years, women who used AIs were less likely to develop major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (HR = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.73-0.97) and heart failure (HR = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.66-0.99) compared with non-users of endocrine therapy. No associations between tamoxifen use and CVD outcomes were observed. AI use was associated with lower risk all-cause, CVD-related, and non-CVD-related mortality, compared with non-use of endocrine therapy. Tamoxifen use was associated with lower risk of all-cause mortality and non-CVD-related mortality, compared with non-use of endocrine therapy, and the association was modified by BMI (P for interaction <0.05). Conclusion Our findings suggest endocrine therapy use reduces all-cause mortality risk and may not increase CVD risk in postmenopausal women with early-stage hormone receptor-positive BC.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
绝经后乳腺癌幸存者的内分泌治疗和心血管疾病风险及死亡率
背景:乳腺癌(BC)患者使用内分泌治疗相关的心血管安全问题日益受到关注。我们研究了绝经后早期BC患者使用内分泌治疗与心血管疾病(CVD)事件和死亡率相关的风险。方法纳入2005 - 2013年诊断为I-III期激素受体阳性BC的绝经后妇女(n = 8,495)。在BC诊断后的12个月内,将女性分为芳香化酶抑制剂(AI)使用者、他莫昔芬使用者和非内分泌治疗使用者。似然比检验检验了使用内分泌治疗与CVD和死亡率结局的关联是否因体重指数(BMI)和BC诊断前的CVD病史而异。结果在中位7.5年的随访中,与未接受内分泌治疗的女性相比,使用内分泌治疗的女性发生主要不良心血管事件(MACE) (HR = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.73-0.97)和心力衰竭(HR = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.66-0.99)的可能性更小。他莫昔芬的使用与CVD结果之间没有关联。与不使用内分泌治疗相比,使用人工内分泌治疗与全因死亡率、心血管疾病相关死亡率和非心血管疾病相关死亡率风险较低相关。与不使用内分泌治疗相比,使用他莫昔芬与全因死亡率和非心血管疾病相关死亡率的风险较低相关,并且这种关联被BMI修正(P为相互作用&;lt;0.05)。结论:我们的研究结果表明,在早期激素受体阳性的绝经后妇女中,使用内分泌治疗可以降低全因死亡风险,并且可能不会增加CVD风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Risk of autoimmune and rheumatic diseases in breast cancer patients with silicone breast implants. Oncofertility patterns after the overturn of Roe v. Wade. Vaccine adherence among adult cancer survivors in the United States The impact of survivorship care on burden of disease among Hodgkin lymphoma survivors Identification of immune cell type-specific susceptibility genes in multiple cancers using transcriptome-wide association studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1