“Chat-Up”: The role of competition in street-level bureaucrats' willingness to break technological rules and use generative pre-trained transformers (GPTs)

IF 6.1 1区 管理学 Q1 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION Public Administration Review Pub Date : 2024-04-23 DOI:10.1111/puar.13824
Neomi Frisch-Aviram, Gabriela Spanghero Lotta, Luciana Jordão de Carvalho
{"title":"“Chat-Up”: The role of competition in street-level bureaucrats' willingness to break technological rules and use generative pre-trained transformers (GPTs)","authors":"Neomi Frisch-Aviram, Gabriela Spanghero Lotta, Luciana Jordão de Carvalho","doi":"10.1111/puar.13824","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Organizations worldwide are concerned about workers using generative pretrained transformers (GPTs), which can generate human-like text in seconds at work. These organizations are setting rules on how and when to use GPTs. This article focuses on street-level bureaucrats' (SLBs) intentions to use GPTs even if their public organization does not allow its use (tech rule-breaking). Based on a mixed-methods exploratory design, using focus groups (<i>N</i> = 14) and a survey experiment (<i>N</i> = 279), we demonstrate that SLBs intend to break the rules and use GPTs when their competitors from the private sector have access to artificial intelligence (AI) tools. We discuss these findings in the context of hybrid forms of public management and the Promethean moment of GPTs.","PeriodicalId":48431,"journal":{"name":"Public Administration Review","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Administration Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13824","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Organizations worldwide are concerned about workers using generative pretrained transformers (GPTs), which can generate human-like text in seconds at work. These organizations are setting rules on how and when to use GPTs. This article focuses on street-level bureaucrats' (SLBs) intentions to use GPTs even if their public organization does not allow its use (tech rule-breaking). Based on a mixed-methods exploratory design, using focus groups (N = 14) and a survey experiment (N = 279), we demonstrate that SLBs intend to break the rules and use GPTs when their competitors from the private sector have access to artificial intelligence (AI) tools. We discuss these findings in the context of hybrid forms of public management and the Promethean moment of GPTs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
"聊天":竞争在街头官僚愿意打破技术规则、使用生成式预训练变压器(GPT)中的作用
生成式预训练变换器(GPT)可以在几秒钟内生成类似人类的文本,世界各地的组织都在担心工人使用这种变换器。这些组织正在制定如何以及何时使用 GPT 的规则。本文关注的是,即使公共组织不允许使用 GPT,街道官员(SLBs)使用 GPT 的意图(技术规则破坏)。基于混合方法的探索性设计,利用焦点小组(N = 14)和调查实验(N = 279),我们证明,当来自私营部门的竞争对手可以使用人工智能(AI)工具时,基层官员打算打破规则,使用 GPT。我们将在公共管理的混合形式和 GPT 的普罗米修斯时刻的背景下讨论这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Public Administration Review
Public Administration Review PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION-
CiteScore
15.10
自引率
10.80%
发文量
130
期刊介绍: Public Administration Review (PAR), a bi-monthly professional journal, has held its position as the premier outlet for public administration research, theory, and practice for 75 years. Published for the American Society for Public Administration,TM/SM, it uniquely serves both academics and practitioners in the public sector. PAR features articles that identify and analyze current trends, offer a factual basis for decision-making, stimulate discussion, and present leading literature in an easily accessible format. Covering a diverse range of topics and featuring expert book reviews, PAR is both exciting to read and an indispensable resource in the field.
期刊最新文献
The evolving practice of UK Government ministers First impressions: An analysis of professional stereotypes and their impact on sector attraction Evaluating use of evidence in U.S. state governments: A conjoint analysis How scholars can support government analytics: Combining employee surveys with more administrative data sources towards a better understanding of how government functions Political accountability and social equity in public budgeting: Examining the role of local institutions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1