Exploring the lack of liking for faba bean ingredients with different sensory profiles

IF 4.9 1区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Food Quality and Preference Pub Date : 2024-04-21 DOI:10.1016/j.foodqual.2024.105198
Fabio Tuccillo , Anna-Maija Lampi , Kati Katina , Mari Sandell
{"title":"Exploring the lack of liking for faba bean ingredients with different sensory profiles","authors":"Fabio Tuccillo ,&nbsp;Anna-Maija Lampi ,&nbsp;Kati Katina ,&nbsp;Mari Sandell","doi":"10.1016/j.foodqual.2024.105198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Faba bean ingredients offer a key role as protein source for wide-ranging food applications, including alternatives to meat and dairy products. However, consumer acceptance is crucial for their integration into people’s diets. This study investigated consumer liking and willingness to use faba bean ingredients and identified the sensory properties that drive consumer preference. Our research involved 264 participants, each with diverse taste abilities, personal attitudes, food choice motives, dietary habits, and demographics. Participants evaluated four pastes made with faba bean ingredients and water in a sensory laboratory setting. Ratings for the liking of smell, taste, overall liking and willingness to use were collected. Additionally, participants evaluated various sensory attributes using Rate-All-That-Apply and Check-All-That-Apply methodologies. To explore the relationships between hedonics, sensory attributes, and participant characteristics, we performed L-PLS regression. Our study revealed that the liking of smell, taste, overall liking, and willingness to use were low for all ingredients, despite their distinct sensory properties. While L-PLS regression did not reveal a distinct pattern of liking, penalty-lift analysis indicated that bitterness was the primary driver of dislike. Moreover, our study identified distinct consumer groups with varying preferences for certain ingredient types. However, considering the overall low-liking scores, the practical relevance of consumer insights might be limited. Our study underscores the interplay between sensory attributes, consumer preferences, and attitudes towards faba bean ingredients. It suggests that addressing bitterness issues could be pivotal in enhancing the market prospects of faba bean ingredients and facilitating their broader acceptance as a protein source.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":322,"journal":{"name":"Food Quality and Preference","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950329324001009/pdfft?md5=4b33e622dbced1b707971fc5b3e00adc&pid=1-s2.0-S0950329324001009-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Quality and Preference","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950329324001009","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Faba bean ingredients offer a key role as protein source for wide-ranging food applications, including alternatives to meat and dairy products. However, consumer acceptance is crucial for their integration into people’s diets. This study investigated consumer liking and willingness to use faba bean ingredients and identified the sensory properties that drive consumer preference. Our research involved 264 participants, each with diverse taste abilities, personal attitudes, food choice motives, dietary habits, and demographics. Participants evaluated four pastes made with faba bean ingredients and water in a sensory laboratory setting. Ratings for the liking of smell, taste, overall liking and willingness to use were collected. Additionally, participants evaluated various sensory attributes using Rate-All-That-Apply and Check-All-That-Apply methodologies. To explore the relationships between hedonics, sensory attributes, and participant characteristics, we performed L-PLS regression. Our study revealed that the liking of smell, taste, overall liking, and willingness to use were low for all ingredients, despite their distinct sensory properties. While L-PLS regression did not reveal a distinct pattern of liking, penalty-lift analysis indicated that bitterness was the primary driver of dislike. Moreover, our study identified distinct consumer groups with varying preferences for certain ingredient types. However, considering the overall low-liking scores, the practical relevance of consumer insights might be limited. Our study underscores the interplay between sensory attributes, consumer preferences, and attitudes towards faba bean ingredients. It suggests that addressing bitterness issues could be pivotal in enhancing the market prospects of faba bean ingredients and facilitating their broader acceptance as a protein source.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索对不同感官特征的蚕豆配料缺乏好感的原因
在广泛的食品应用领域,包括肉类和乳制品的替代品中,Faba 豆成分作为蛋白质来源发挥着关键作用。然而,要将其融入人们的饮食,消费者的接受度至关重要。本研究调查了消费者对使用蚕豆配料的喜好和意愿,并确定了驱动消费者喜好的感官特性。我们的研究涉及 264 名参与者,他们的味觉能力、个人态度、食品选择动机、饮食习惯和人口统计学特征各不相同。参与者在感官实验室中对四种用蚕豆成分和水制成的糊状物进行了评估。对气味、味道、总体喜好和使用意愿进行了评分。此外,参与者还使用 "全评全用 "和 "全查全用 "方法对各种感官属性进行了评估。为了探索享乐主义、感官属性和参与者特征之间的关系,我们进行了 L-PLS 回归。我们的研究表明,尽管所有成分都具有不同的感官属性,但它们的嗅觉、味觉、总体喜好度和使用意愿都很低。虽然 L-PLS 回归没有显示出明显的喜好模式,但惩罚提升分析表明,苦味是导致不喜欢的主要原因。此外,我们的研究还发现了不同的消费群体,他们对某些配料类型的偏好也各不相同。然而,考虑到总体上的低喜好得分,消费者洞察的实际意义可能有限。我们的研究强调了感官属性、消费者偏好和对蚕豆配料态度之间的相互作用。研究表明,解决苦味问题对于提高蚕豆配料的市场前景和促进其作为蛋白质来源被更广泛地接受至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Food Quality and Preference
Food Quality and Preference 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
15.10%
发文量
263
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Food Quality and Preference is a journal devoted to sensory, consumer and behavioural research in food and non-food products. It publishes original research, critical reviews, and short communications in sensory and consumer science, and sensometrics. In addition, the journal publishes special invited issues on important timely topics and from relevant conferences. These are aimed at bridging the gap between research and application, bringing together authors and readers in consumer and market research, sensory science, sensometrics and sensory evaluation, nutrition and food choice, as well as food research, product development and sensory quality assurance. Submissions to Food Quality and Preference are limited to papers that include some form of human measurement; papers that are limited to physical/chemical measures or the routine application of sensory, consumer or econometric analysis will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution in line with the journal''s coverage as outlined below.
期刊最新文献
Understanding the role of awareness and trust in consumer purchase decisions for healthy food and products Editorial Board “I’m like, whatever you want me to be. I’m the flavor of the day”: A mixed-methods study of the food dispositions and behaviors of mixed-race individuals Advancing investigations into the effects of sweet and bitter tastes on agreeableness and hostility Diversity in gender and age, but not in race, enhances food purchase intentions in Japan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1