The value of food innovation with children: The case of ‘insect snack balls for kids’

IF 4.9 1区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Food Quality and Preference Pub Date : 2024-04-21 DOI:10.1016/j.foodqual.2024.105199
Ilse van Lier , Emmy van den Heuvel , Edgar van Mil , Remco C. Havermans
{"title":"The value of food innovation with children: The case of ‘insect snack balls for kids’","authors":"Ilse van Lier ,&nbsp;Emmy van den Heuvel ,&nbsp;Edgar van Mil ,&nbsp;Remco C. Havermans","doi":"10.1016/j.foodqual.2024.105199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In the current study, we examined the value of co-creation with and for children within the context of the ideation and development of novel snack products with insects as a core ingredient. A panel of children (<em>n</em> = 21, <em>M</em> age = 9.7 years) took part in creative focus groups aimed at conceptualising flavours for insect snack balls. The three most popular concepts were further developed into prototypes. In a tasting session, with a second panel of children (<em>n</em> = 44, <em>M</em> age = 11.4 years), these prototypes were assessed and compared with three alternative snack ball flavour concepts, separately conceived by adults. Children rated the adults’ concepts significantly higher than the children’s concepts in terms of flavour liking, wanting, and overall acceptance. Children exhibited neither a higher rate of correct flavour identification for the adult concepts nor were they able to recognize whether the concepts were conceived by adults or children. We conclude that food product co-creation with and for children is feasible but does not necessarily lead to more acceptable products – at least not in the context of novel foods.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":322,"journal":{"name":"Food Quality and Preference","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950329324001010/pdfft?md5=75a2023ba02d89aafba9948e431f3f24&pid=1-s2.0-S0950329324001010-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Quality and Preference","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950329324001010","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the current study, we examined the value of co-creation with and for children within the context of the ideation and development of novel snack products with insects as a core ingredient. A panel of children (n = 21, M age = 9.7 years) took part in creative focus groups aimed at conceptualising flavours for insect snack balls. The three most popular concepts were further developed into prototypes. In a tasting session, with a second panel of children (n = 44, M age = 11.4 years), these prototypes were assessed and compared with three alternative snack ball flavour concepts, separately conceived by adults. Children rated the adults’ concepts significantly higher than the children’s concepts in terms of flavour liking, wanting, and overall acceptance. Children exhibited neither a higher rate of correct flavour identification for the adult concepts nor were they able to recognize whether the concepts were conceived by adults or children. We conclude that food product co-creation with and for children is feasible but does not necessarily lead to more acceptable products – at least not in the context of novel foods.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿童食品创新的价值:儿童昆虫零食球 "案例
在本研究中,我们以昆虫为核心成分的新型零食产品的构思和开发为背景,考察了与儿童共同创造和为儿童共同创造的价值。一组儿童(n = 21,平均年龄 = 9.7 岁)参加了创意焦点小组,旨在构思昆虫零食球的口味。最受欢迎的三个概念被进一步开发成原型。在第二组儿童(人数=44,平均年龄=11.4 岁)的品尝环节中,对这些原型进行了评估,并与成人分别构思的三种零食球口味概念进行了比较。在口味喜欢度、想要度和总体接受度方面,儿童对成人概念的评价明显高于儿童概念。儿童对成人概念的口味识别正确率既不高,也无法辨别概念是由成人还是儿童提出的。我们的结论是,与儿童共同创造食品和为儿童创造食品是可行的,但并不一定会带来更容易接受的产品--至少在新颖食品方面不会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Food Quality and Preference
Food Quality and Preference 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
15.10%
发文量
263
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Food Quality and Preference is a journal devoted to sensory, consumer and behavioural research in food and non-food products. It publishes original research, critical reviews, and short communications in sensory and consumer science, and sensometrics. In addition, the journal publishes special invited issues on important timely topics and from relevant conferences. These are aimed at bridging the gap between research and application, bringing together authors and readers in consumer and market research, sensory science, sensometrics and sensory evaluation, nutrition and food choice, as well as food research, product development and sensory quality assurance. Submissions to Food Quality and Preference are limited to papers that include some form of human measurement; papers that are limited to physical/chemical measures or the routine application of sensory, consumer or econometric analysis will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution in line with the journal''s coverage as outlined below.
期刊最新文献
Understanding the role of awareness and trust in consumer purchase decisions for healthy food and products Editorial Board “I’m like, whatever you want me to be. I’m the flavor of the day”: A mixed-methods study of the food dispositions and behaviors of mixed-race individuals Advancing investigations into the effects of sweet and bitter tastes on agreeableness and hostility Diversity in gender and age, but not in race, enhances food purchase intentions in Japan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1