Warda Nejjari, Roeland van Hout, Marinel Gerritsen, Brigitte Planken
{"title":"Nativeness perceptions and speaker voice as predictors of (non-)native English speaker evaluations in four ELF contexts","authors":"Warda Nejjari, Roeland van Hout, Marinel Gerritsen, Brigitte Planken","doi":"10.1016/j.lingua.2024.103737","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We investigated the extent to which responses (<em>N</em> = 6617) by four L2 English listener groups (The Netherlands: <em>n</em> = 1701; Germany: <em>n</em> = 1606; Spain: <em>n</em> = 1647; Singapore: <em>n</em> = 1663) were affected by giving L1 English speaker status to standard L1 British and American English accents, compared with a typical Dutch English accent. We assessed the extent to which <em>presumed nativeness</em> impacted speaker evaluations (status, affect, dynamism), and the extent to which a speaker’s <em>voice</em> influenced speaker evaluations by analyzing listener responses to verbal and matched guises. The results showed that presumptions of a speaker’s nativeness significantly impacted speaker evaluations on all dimensions, and we therefore conclude that speaker evaluations are also based on listeners’ views on a speaker's nativeness. In addition, speaker evaluations were influenced by a speaker’s voice to such an extent that this can lead to significantly more positive/negative speaker evaluations of both L1 and L2 English speakers. Finally, this study confirms the relevance and main benefit of the matched-guise technique in accentedness research, compared with the verbal-guise technique, since the former successfully minimizes the actual impact of voice.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47955,"journal":{"name":"Lingua","volume":"305 ","pages":"Article 103737"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0024384124000664/pdfft?md5=95ac09be50e6ee3ad28721883ed166f5&pid=1-s2.0-S0024384124000664-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lingua","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0024384124000664","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
We investigated the extent to which responses (N = 6617) by four L2 English listener groups (The Netherlands: n = 1701; Germany: n = 1606; Spain: n = 1647; Singapore: n = 1663) were affected by giving L1 English speaker status to standard L1 British and American English accents, compared with a typical Dutch English accent. We assessed the extent to which presumed nativeness impacted speaker evaluations (status, affect, dynamism), and the extent to which a speaker’s voice influenced speaker evaluations by analyzing listener responses to verbal and matched guises. The results showed that presumptions of a speaker’s nativeness significantly impacted speaker evaluations on all dimensions, and we therefore conclude that speaker evaluations are also based on listeners’ views on a speaker's nativeness. In addition, speaker evaluations were influenced by a speaker’s voice to such an extent that this can lead to significantly more positive/negative speaker evaluations of both L1 and L2 English speakers. Finally, this study confirms the relevance and main benefit of the matched-guise technique in accentedness research, compared with the verbal-guise technique, since the former successfully minimizes the actual impact of voice.
期刊介绍:
Lingua publishes papers of any length, if justified, as well as review articles surveying developments in the various fields of linguistics, and occasional discussions. A considerable number of pages in each issue are devoted to critical book reviews. Lingua also publishes Lingua Franca articles consisting of provocative exchanges expressing strong opinions on central topics in linguistics; The Decade In articles which are educational articles offering the nonspecialist linguist an overview of a given area of study; and Taking up the Gauntlet special issues composed of a set number of papers examining one set of data and exploring whose theory offers the most insight with a minimal set of assumptions and a maximum of arguments.