On Korean progressive/perfect constructions

IF 1.1 3区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Lingua Pub Date : 2025-02-27 DOI:10.1016/j.lingua.2025.103903
Kwang-sup Kim
{"title":"On Korean progressive/perfect constructions","authors":"Kwang-sup Kim","doi":"10.1016/j.lingua.2025.103903","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>It is well-known that the <em>−ko iss-</em> form in Korean is ambiguous, being interpreted as either a progressive reading or a resultant state reading. The primary claim of this article is that <em>−ko iss-</em> is, in fact, six-way ambiguous. This ambiguity arises from the interplay of three factors: the ambiguity of <em>−ko</em>, the ambiguity of <em>iss-</em>, and the optional presence of the light verb <em>v*</em>. The morpheme <em>−ko</em> is ambiguous between ‘simultaneous’ (<em>+Simul</em>) and ‘non-simultaneous’ (<em>−Simul</em>) readings. When used as an aspect marker, <em>−ko<sub>[+Simul]</sub></em> denotes the in-progress state of an event, while <em>−ko<sub>[−Simul]</sub></em> indicates either a resultant state or a continuative state of the event or state. Meanwhile, <em>iss-</em> can be interpreted either as a raising predicate or as a control predicate. Furthermore, the <em>−ko iss-</em> form can optionally co-occur with the light verb <em>v*</em>. Given these ambiguities, there are theoretically eight possible <em>−ko iss-</em> constructions. However, this article shows that only six of these are attested, as some combinations result in pragmatic anomaly. In accounting for the −<em>ko iss</em>- form, this article demonstrates that Korean progressive and perfect constructions share a striking similarity with their English counterparts, as both rely on the same underlying mechanism.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47955,"journal":{"name":"Lingua","volume":"318 ","pages":"Article 103903"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lingua","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0024384125000282","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It is well-known that the −ko iss- form in Korean is ambiguous, being interpreted as either a progressive reading or a resultant state reading. The primary claim of this article is that −ko iss- is, in fact, six-way ambiguous. This ambiguity arises from the interplay of three factors: the ambiguity of −ko, the ambiguity of iss-, and the optional presence of the light verb v*. The morpheme −ko is ambiguous between ‘simultaneous’ (+Simul) and ‘non-simultaneous’ (−Simul) readings. When used as an aspect marker, −ko[+Simul] denotes the in-progress state of an event, while −ko[−Simul] indicates either a resultant state or a continuative state of the event or state. Meanwhile, iss- can be interpreted either as a raising predicate or as a control predicate. Furthermore, the −ko iss- form can optionally co-occur with the light verb v*. Given these ambiguities, there are theoretically eight possible −ko iss- constructions. However, this article shows that only six of these are attested, as some combinations result in pragmatic anomaly. In accounting for the −ko iss- form, this article demonstrates that Korean progressive and perfect constructions share a striking similarity with their English counterparts, as both rely on the same underlying mechanism.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Lingua
Lingua Multiple-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
9.10%
发文量
93
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: Lingua publishes papers of any length, if justified, as well as review articles surveying developments in the various fields of linguistics, and occasional discussions. A considerable number of pages in each issue are devoted to critical book reviews. Lingua also publishes Lingua Franca articles consisting of provocative exchanges expressing strong opinions on central topics in linguistics; The Decade In articles which are educational articles offering the nonspecialist linguist an overview of a given area of study; and Taking up the Gauntlet special issues composed of a set number of papers examining one set of data and exploring whose theory offers the most insight with a minimal set of assumptions and a maximum of arguments.
期刊最新文献
An empirical study on parameters affecting the recoverability of deictic null subjects in Korean Editorial Board Bilingual influences and sources of variability in acceptability judgments: A case study of Chinese On Korean progressive/perfect constructions Formulaic expressions in Korean academic discourse: A corpus-based combinatoric morphemic analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1