Pocket money and the risk of dental caries and oral pain in children

Margaret Trimble , Sita Manasa Susarla , Claudia Campos , Bathsheba Turton , Karen Sokal-Gutierrez
{"title":"Pocket money and the risk of dental caries and oral pain in children","authors":"Margaret Trimble ,&nbsp;Sita Manasa Susarla ,&nbsp;Claudia Campos ,&nbsp;Bathsheba Turton ,&nbsp;Karen Sokal-Gutierrez","doi":"10.1016/j.glmedi.2024.100106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Tooth decay affects 40–90 % of children in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), contributing to adverse consequences, including oral pain, difficulty focusing in school, lifelong dental problems, and overall lower quality of life. Few studies have examined the relationship between pocket money given to children, their purchase of sugary snacks and drinks with that money, and the risk for tooth decay.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This secondary cross-sectional analysis utilized data which were collected in 2014 as part of an oral health promotion program in rural El Salvador. A convenience sample of 279 children and their mothers who participated in the program were recruited to complete an interview with trained community health workers, and children received a dental examination from trained and licensed Salvadoran and U.S. dentists. Only children with teeth (primary, mixed, or permanent dentition) were included in this analysis; as such, children ranged in age from 6 months through 14 years. Descriptive, multivariate logistic regression, and Zero-Inflated Negative Binomial analyses were used to identify associations between pocket money given to children and three oral health outcomes: number of decayed, missing/extracted due to decay, and filled teeth (dmft for primary teeth and DMFT for permanent teeth); presence of deep decay; and occurrence of oral pain.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Overall, almost two-thirds of children received daily pocket money with which over 70 % purchased unhealthy snacks/drinks; 83 % of children had tooth decay, with a mean dmft/DMFT of 6.0. After adjusting for covariates, receiving pocket money was associated with 0.18 (95 % CI: 0.05–0.54) times the odds of having zero-dmft/DMFT (i.e., being cavity-free) (<em>p</em> = 0.002). Among children with at least one decayed tooth, receiving pocket money was associated with 1.22 (95 % CI: 1.01–1.53) times the expected dmft/DMFT count (<em>p</em> = 0.04), 3.39 (95 % CI: 1.59–7.22) times the odds of deep decay (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), and 2.66 (95 % CI: 1.24–5.70) times the odds of oral pain (<em>p</em> = 0.007) compared to children who did not receive pocket money.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Interventions to reduce the prevalence and severity of tooth decay should include nutrition and oral health education for children and families—including addressing pocket money and healthy vs. unhealthy purchases—in schools, communities, and primary health clinics; school programs to provide healthy foods and beverages for children; and enforcement of policies to prohibit the sale of ultra-processed foods and sugary drinks in and around schools.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100804,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medicine, Surgery, and Public Health","volume":"3 ","pages":"Article 100106"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949916X24000598/pdfft?md5=f6e498f69b76d3eae16bd408c2753775&pid=1-s2.0-S2949916X24000598-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medicine, Surgery, and Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949916X24000598","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Tooth decay affects 40–90 % of children in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), contributing to adverse consequences, including oral pain, difficulty focusing in school, lifelong dental problems, and overall lower quality of life. Few studies have examined the relationship between pocket money given to children, their purchase of sugary snacks and drinks with that money, and the risk for tooth decay.

Methods

This secondary cross-sectional analysis utilized data which were collected in 2014 as part of an oral health promotion program in rural El Salvador. A convenience sample of 279 children and their mothers who participated in the program were recruited to complete an interview with trained community health workers, and children received a dental examination from trained and licensed Salvadoran and U.S. dentists. Only children with teeth (primary, mixed, or permanent dentition) were included in this analysis; as such, children ranged in age from 6 months through 14 years. Descriptive, multivariate logistic regression, and Zero-Inflated Negative Binomial analyses were used to identify associations between pocket money given to children and three oral health outcomes: number of decayed, missing/extracted due to decay, and filled teeth (dmft for primary teeth and DMFT for permanent teeth); presence of deep decay; and occurrence of oral pain.

Results

Overall, almost two-thirds of children received daily pocket money with which over 70 % purchased unhealthy snacks/drinks; 83 % of children had tooth decay, with a mean dmft/DMFT of 6.0. After adjusting for covariates, receiving pocket money was associated with 0.18 (95 % CI: 0.05–0.54) times the odds of having zero-dmft/DMFT (i.e., being cavity-free) (p = 0.002). Among children with at least one decayed tooth, receiving pocket money was associated with 1.22 (95 % CI: 1.01–1.53) times the expected dmft/DMFT count (p = 0.04), 3.39 (95 % CI: 1.59–7.22) times the odds of deep decay (p < 0.001), and 2.66 (95 % CI: 1.24–5.70) times the odds of oral pain (p = 0.007) compared to children who did not receive pocket money.

Conclusion

Interventions to reduce the prevalence and severity of tooth decay should include nutrition and oral health education for children and families—including addressing pocket money and healthy vs. unhealthy purchases—in schools, communities, and primary health clinics; school programs to provide healthy foods and beverages for children; and enforcement of policies to prohibit the sale of ultra-processed foods and sugary drinks in and around schools.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
零花钱与儿童患龋齿和口腔疼痛的风险
背景蛀牙影响着中低收入国家(LMICs)40%-90%的儿童,造成不良后果,包括口腔疼痛、学习注意力难以集中、终身牙科问题和整体生活质量下降。这项二级横断面分析利用了 2014 年收集的数据,这些数据是萨尔瓦多农村地区口腔健康促进项目的一部分。我们招募了 279 名参加该计划的儿童及其母亲作为便利样本,让他们与经过培训的社区卫生工作者完成访谈,并由经过培训、持有执照的萨尔瓦多和美国牙医为儿童进行牙科检查。只有长有牙齿(初级、混合或恒牙)的儿童才被纳入分析范围;因此,儿童的年龄从 6 个月到 14 岁不等。通过描述性分析、多元逻辑回归分析和零膨胀负二项分析,确定了给儿童零花钱与三种口腔健康结果之间的关系:蛀牙、蛀牙缺失/脱落和补牙的数量(乳牙为 dmft,恒牙为 DMFT);是否存在深度蛀牙;以及是否出现口腔疼痛。结果总体而言,近三分之二的儿童每天都会收到零花钱,其中超过 70% 的儿童会用零花钱购买不健康的零食/饮料;83% 的儿童有蛀牙,平均蛀牙量/蛀牙时间为 6.0。在对辅助变量进行调整后,获得零花钱与零蛀牙/DMFT(即无蛀牙)几率的 0.18 倍(95 % CI:0.05-0.54)相关(p = 0.002)。在至少有一颗蛀牙的儿童中,与没有收到零用钱的儿童相比,收到零用钱的儿童的dmft/DMFT数量是预期的1.22(95 % CI:1.01-1.53)倍(p = 0.04),深龋几率是预期的3.39(95 % CI:1.59-7.22)倍(p <0.001),口腔疼痛几率是预期的2.66(95 % CI:1.24-5.70)倍(p = 0.007)。结论减少蛀牙发生率和严重程度的干预措施应包括:在学校、社区和初级卫生诊所对儿童和家庭进行营养和口腔健康教育,包括解决零花钱问题和健康与不健康购物的问题;为儿童提供健康食品和饮料的学校计划;以及执行禁止在学校内和学校周围销售超加工食品和含糖饮料的政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Association between women’s autonomy and reproductive health outcomes in India Persistent blepharospasm and bradyphrenia following Artery of Percheron infarction Revised clinical standards for assessing sepsis: Serum iron level as an emerging biomarker Ethical Challenges in the Integration of Artificial Intelligence in Palliative Care Cancer screening among sexual minority groups in the United States
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1