Ogochukwu Juliet Ezeigwe , Samuel Tundealao , Ogochukwu Ruth Abasilim , Olajumoke Ope Oladoyin , Manali Desai , Devesh Malgave , Lekan Ajijola , Xianglin L. Du
{"title":"Impact of patient-physician communication on cervical cancer screening among women aged 25–65","authors":"Ogochukwu Juliet Ezeigwe , Samuel Tundealao , Ogochukwu Ruth Abasilim , Olajumoke Ope Oladoyin , Manali Desai , Devesh Malgave , Lekan Ajijola , Xianglin L. Du","doi":"10.1016/j.glmedi.2025.100182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Effective patient-physician communication is essential for the uptake of preventive services. This study examined the association between patient-physician communication index and being up-to-date with cervical cancer screening.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The analysis used self-reported data from the Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS) 5, Cycle 4 (2020), and Cycle 6 (2022). The outcome variable was “Up-to-date with cervical cancer Screening.” Logistic regression and Cronbach’s Alpha were used to measure the association and internal consistency between communication items.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 3207 women aged 25–65 were included in the analysis, 2415 (77.5 %) were up-to-date with screenings, with 50.9 % having a patient-physician communication index of 17 or higher. In model 0, participants with a patient-physician communication index of ≥ 17 had 1.57 times higher odds (95 % CI: 1.23–2.00) of being up-to-date with their screening. In model 1, the individual communication items were not significantly associated with screening. In model 2, a patient-physician communication index of 17 or higher was associated with screening (aOR:1.62, 95 % CI: 1.20–2.19). Having health insurance (aOR:1.87, 95 % CI: 1.11–3.17) was significantly associated with screening. Non-Hispanic Blacks (aOR:1.77, 95 % CI: 1.10–2.85) and Hispanics (aOR:1.64, 95 % CI: 1.02–2.64) had higher odds of screening than non-Hispanic Whites.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study found a significant relationship between a high patient-physician communication index and cervical cancer screening. The study findings highlight the critical role of effective patient-physician communication in improving adherence to cervical screening recommendations across the U.S.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100804,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medicine, Surgery, and Public Health","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100182"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medicine, Surgery, and Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949916X25000064","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
Effective patient-physician communication is essential for the uptake of preventive services. This study examined the association between patient-physician communication index and being up-to-date with cervical cancer screening.
Methods
The analysis used self-reported data from the Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS) 5, Cycle 4 (2020), and Cycle 6 (2022). The outcome variable was “Up-to-date with cervical cancer Screening.” Logistic regression and Cronbach’s Alpha were used to measure the association and internal consistency between communication items.
Results
A total of 3207 women aged 25–65 were included in the analysis, 2415 (77.5 %) were up-to-date with screenings, with 50.9 % having a patient-physician communication index of 17 or higher. In model 0, participants with a patient-physician communication index of ≥ 17 had 1.57 times higher odds (95 % CI: 1.23–2.00) of being up-to-date with their screening. In model 1, the individual communication items were not significantly associated with screening. In model 2, a patient-physician communication index of 17 or higher was associated with screening (aOR:1.62, 95 % CI: 1.20–2.19). Having health insurance (aOR:1.87, 95 % CI: 1.11–3.17) was significantly associated with screening. Non-Hispanic Blacks (aOR:1.77, 95 % CI: 1.10–2.85) and Hispanics (aOR:1.64, 95 % CI: 1.02–2.64) had higher odds of screening than non-Hispanic Whites.
Conclusion
This study found a significant relationship between a high patient-physician communication index and cervical cancer screening. The study findings highlight the critical role of effective patient-physician communication in improving adherence to cervical screening recommendations across the U.S.