Annabelle M. Mournet , Alexander J. Millner , Evan M. Kleiman
{"title":"Characteristics of self-harm on an adolescent psychiatric inpatient unit based on neurodevelopmental diagnoses","authors":"Annabelle M. Mournet , Alexander J. Millner , Evan M. Kleiman","doi":"10.1016/j.jadr.2024.100796","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Engagement in self-harm is common among youth in psychiatric inpatient units, however the nature of self-harm may be different in psychiatric care due to the increased supervision and theoretically decreased access to typical means of self-harm. This study aims to describe daily reports of self-harm experienced during psychiatric inpatient stays among adolescents and compare these inpatient self-harm experiences based on neurodevelopmental diagnoses (NDDs, including autism) given that self-harm methods differ across NDD diagnostic groups outside of the inpatient unit.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Data were derived from a larger study of risk factors among a sample of 119 suicidal adolescent inpatients, recruited from a large, urban adolescent inpatient psychiatric unit. Participants answered a daily series of self-report questions, including items about self-harm engagement, frequency, and methods used since the last survey.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There was no difference in the number of participants who reported any engagement in self-harm based on diagnostic group (χ<sup>2</sup> = 0.08, <em>p</em> = .96). There were also no differences in the frequency of self-harm across diagnostic groups (<em>F</em> = 2.40, <em>p</em> = .12). There were no differences in the use of any method across diagnostic groups (<em>p</em>s > 0.05).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Findings revealed that in an inpatient unit where patients are presenting for self-harm risk, there are no significant differences in engagement, frequency, or methods used for self-harm based on autism and NDD status. These analyses provide valuable clinical information regarding a lack of differences in self-harm by these diagnostic subgroups. Future research should seek to further explore functional purposes of self-harm on inpatient unit and how this differs by diagnoses.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":52768,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Affective Disorders Reports","volume":"17 ","pages":"Article 100796"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666915324000829/pdfft?md5=07b1cf5b61d02ea05445cdbfb5709bd6&pid=1-s2.0-S2666915324000829-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Affective Disorders Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666915324000829","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
Engagement in self-harm is common among youth in psychiatric inpatient units, however the nature of self-harm may be different in psychiatric care due to the increased supervision and theoretically decreased access to typical means of self-harm. This study aims to describe daily reports of self-harm experienced during psychiatric inpatient stays among adolescents and compare these inpatient self-harm experiences based on neurodevelopmental diagnoses (NDDs, including autism) given that self-harm methods differ across NDD diagnostic groups outside of the inpatient unit.
Methods
Data were derived from a larger study of risk factors among a sample of 119 suicidal adolescent inpatients, recruited from a large, urban adolescent inpatient psychiatric unit. Participants answered a daily series of self-report questions, including items about self-harm engagement, frequency, and methods used since the last survey.
Results
There was no difference in the number of participants who reported any engagement in self-harm based on diagnostic group (χ2 = 0.08, p = .96). There were also no differences in the frequency of self-harm across diagnostic groups (F = 2.40, p = .12). There were no differences in the use of any method across diagnostic groups (ps > 0.05).
Conclusions
Findings revealed that in an inpatient unit where patients are presenting for self-harm risk, there are no significant differences in engagement, frequency, or methods used for self-harm based on autism and NDD status. These analyses provide valuable clinical information regarding a lack of differences in self-harm by these diagnostic subgroups. Future research should seek to further explore functional purposes of self-harm on inpatient unit and how this differs by diagnoses.