Access to Urogynecologic Care in Federally Qualified Health Centers: A Mystery Caller Study.

Micah G Pascual, Atieh Novin, M. Corbisiero, S. Unciano, Y. Hachicha, N. Shelden, Wyanet Bresnitz, Tanaz R. Ferzandi, Tyler M Muffly
{"title":"Access to Urogynecologic Care in Federally Qualified Health Centers: A Mystery Caller Study.","authors":"Micah G Pascual, Atieh Novin, M. Corbisiero, S. Unciano, Y. Hachicha, N. Shelden, Wyanet Bresnitz, Tanaz R. Ferzandi, Tyler M Muffly","doi":"10.1097/SPV.0000000000001514","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"IMPORTANCE\nFederally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) play an important role in providing care to underserved populations. However, little is known about the availability of urogynecology services at FQHCs.\n\n\nOBJECTIVES\nThis study aimed to assess the availability of appointments for urogynecology care and to determine the prevalence of FQHCs offering urogynecologic services.\n\n\nSTUDY DESIGN\nA total of 362 FQHCs across the United States were randomly selected from the Health Resources and Services Administration website, based on specific inclusion criteria. Researchers called the FQHCs and requested the earliest available appointment for pelvic organ prolapse. The availability of urogynecologic services such as pessary fittings, pelvic floor physical therapy, and urodynamic studies was also inquired.\n\n\nRESULTS\nA total of 362 FQHCs located in 46 states and the District of Columbia were called. On average, the 362 FQHCs had been established for 19.9 (SD ±15) years, were located in urban areas, and served a median county population of 24,573. Of the 220 FQHCs successfully contacted, 81% (180/220) reported that they could provide care for a patient with pelvic organ prolapse at an appointment 29.1 business days (SD ±30 days) from the date of the call, on average. However, only a small percentage of these FQHCs offered in-office pessary fittings (11%), complex multichannel urodynamics testing (8.6%), or pelvic floor physical therapy (5%).\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nThe availability of treatments for pelvic floor disorders at FQHCs is limited. These findings highlight a potential disparity in access to urogynecology services for individuals with public insurance.","PeriodicalId":517282,"journal":{"name":"Urogynecology","volume":"48 42","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urogynecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000001514","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

IMPORTANCE Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) play an important role in providing care to underserved populations. However, little is known about the availability of urogynecology services at FQHCs. OBJECTIVES This study aimed to assess the availability of appointments for urogynecology care and to determine the prevalence of FQHCs offering urogynecologic services. STUDY DESIGN A total of 362 FQHCs across the United States were randomly selected from the Health Resources and Services Administration website, based on specific inclusion criteria. Researchers called the FQHCs and requested the earliest available appointment for pelvic organ prolapse. The availability of urogynecologic services such as pessary fittings, pelvic floor physical therapy, and urodynamic studies was also inquired. RESULTS A total of 362 FQHCs located in 46 states and the District of Columbia were called. On average, the 362 FQHCs had been established for 19.9 (SD ±15) years, were located in urban areas, and served a median county population of 24,573. Of the 220 FQHCs successfully contacted, 81% (180/220) reported that they could provide care for a patient with pelvic organ prolapse at an appointment 29.1 business days (SD ±30 days) from the date of the call, on average. However, only a small percentage of these FQHCs offered in-office pessary fittings (11%), complex multichannel urodynamics testing (8.6%), or pelvic floor physical therapy (5%). CONCLUSION The availability of treatments for pelvic floor disorders at FQHCs is limited. These findings highlight a potential disparity in access to urogynecology services for individuals with public insurance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
联邦合格医疗中心的泌尿妇科医疗服务:神秘来电研究。
重要性联邦合格保健中心(FQHC)在为服务不足的人群提供医疗服务方面发挥着重要作用。本研究旨在评估泌尿妇科护理预约的可用性,并确定提供泌尿妇科服务的联邦合格健康中心的普及率。研究设计根据特定的纳入标准,从卫生资源和服务管理局网站上随机抽取了全美 362 家联邦合格健康中心。研究人员致电这些 FQHC,要求尽早预约盆腔器官脱垂患者。研究人员还询问了泌尿妇科服务的提供情况,如子宫环安装、盆底物理治疗和尿动力学研究。结果研究人员共致电了位于 46 个州和哥伦比亚特区的 362 家 FQHC。这 362 家 FQHC 平均成立时间为 19.9 年(SD ±15),均位于城市地区,服务的县人口中位数为 24,573 人。在成功联系到的 220 家 FQHC 中,81%(180/220)的 FQHC 报告说,他们可以为盆腔脏器脱垂患者提供护理服务,预约时间平均为自呼叫之日起 29.1 个工作日(SD ±30)。然而,在这些 FQHC 中,仅有一小部分提供诊室内窥阴器安装(11%)、复杂多通道尿动力学检测(8.6%)或盆底物理治疗(5%)。这些发现凸显了享受公共保险的个人在获得泌尿妇科服务方面可能存在的差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Staged Versus Concomitant Stress Incontinence Procedures With Prolapse Repairs The Effect of a Physician Consultation on Patient Reported Outcomes in Urogynecology 16th EUGA Annual Congress 19-21 October 2023, Varese – Palais des Congrès Laser and Pelvic Floor Muscle Training for Urinary Incontinence: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Access to Urogynecologic Care in Federally Qualified Health Centers: A Mystery Caller Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1