首页 > 最新文献

Urogynecology最新文献

英文 中文
The Effect of a Physician Consultation on Patient Reported Outcomes in Urogynecology 医生会诊对泌尿妇科患者报告结果的影响
Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000001439
Emily Edwards, Sarah Boyles, Claire Gould, Blake Osmundsen
Importance It has not yet been determined whether there is an effect of the initial urogynecologic consultation and resultant management plan on the patient’s bother from her pelvic floor condition. Objective The aim of the study was to see whether patient-reported outcomes of bother were different before and after consultation with a specialist. Study Design Fifty patients completed both preconsultation and postconsultation Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20) and Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7). Patients were eligible if they were naive to urogynecology care and had never had treatment for the chief complaint in the past. They were not eligible if they received treatment at their consultation visits. A paired t test was used for comparison. A linear model determined whether baseline PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7 scores as explanatory variables had an effect on the pre-post delta as outcome variable. Results There was no statistically significant difference between PFDI-20 scores before (mean, 86.5) and after (mean, 83.1) consultation. There was additionally no difference between PFIQ-7 scores before (mean, 61.1) and after (mean, 65.4) consultation. There was, however, a greater degree of change in scores if the patient presented with little bother versus large bother at the initial consultation. Conclusions For the new urogynecologic patients, those with lower baseline bother showed higher change (improvement) in scores after the consultation.
重要性 首次泌尿妇科会诊及会诊后的治疗方案是否会对患者盆底状况造成的困扰产生影响,目前尚未确定。本研究旨在了解患者报告的困扰结果在接受专家会诊前后是否有所不同。研究设计 50 名患者完成了咨询前和咨询后盆底压力量表 (PFDI-20) 和盆底影响问卷 (PFIQ-7)。如果患者对泌尿妇科护理一无所知,且过去从未因主诉接受过治疗,则符合条件。如果患者在就诊时接受过治疗,则不符合条件。采用配对 t 检验进行比较。通过线性模型确定作为解释变量的 PFDI-20 和 PFIQ-7 基线分数是否会对作为结果变量的前后 delta 产生影响。结果 咨询前(平均 86.5 分)和咨询后(平均 83.1 分)的 PFDI-20 分数在统计学上没有显著差异。此外,PFIQ-7 评分在咨询前(平均值为 61.1)和咨询后(平均值为 65.4)之间也没有差异。不过,如果患者在初诊时表现为 "小烦恼",那么得分的变化程度要大于 "大烦恼"。结论 对于新的泌尿妇科疾病患者,基线困扰较低的患者在就诊后的评分变化(改善)较高。
{"title":"The Effect of a Physician Consultation on Patient Reported Outcomes in Urogynecology","authors":"Emily Edwards, Sarah Boyles, Claire Gould, Blake Osmundsen","doi":"10.1097/SPV.0000000000001439","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000001439","url":null,"abstract":"Importance It has not yet been determined whether there is an effect of the initial urogynecologic consultation and resultant management plan on the patient’s bother from her pelvic floor condition. Objective The aim of the study was to see whether patient-reported outcomes of bother were different before and after consultation with a specialist. Study Design Fifty patients completed both preconsultation and postconsultation Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20) and Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7). Patients were eligible if they were naive to urogynecology care and had never had treatment for the chief complaint in the past. They were not eligible if they received treatment at their consultation visits. A paired t test was used for comparison. A linear model determined whether baseline PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7 scores as explanatory variables had an effect on the pre-post delta as outcome variable. Results There was no statistically significant difference between PFDI-20 scores before (mean, 86.5) and after (mean, 83.1) consultation. There was additionally no difference between PFIQ-7 scores before (mean, 61.1) and after (mean, 65.4) consultation. There was, however, a greater degree of change in scores if the patient presented with little bother versus large bother at the initial consultation. Conclusions For the new urogynecologic patients, those with lower baseline bother showed higher change (improvement) in scores after the consultation.","PeriodicalId":517282,"journal":{"name":"Urogynecology","volume":"31 3","pages":"637 - 641"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141702804","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Staged Versus Concomitant Stress Incontinence Procedures With Prolapse Repairs 压力性尿失禁手术与脱垂修复术的分期与同期治疗
Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI: 10.1097/spv.0000000000001550
J. Shepherd
{"title":"Staged Versus Concomitant Stress Incontinence Procedures With Prolapse Repairs","authors":"J. Shepherd","doi":"10.1097/spv.0000000000001550","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/spv.0000000000001550","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":517282,"journal":{"name":"Urogynecology","volume":"3 21","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141700775","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
16th EUGA Annual Congress 19-21 October 2023, Varese – Palais des Congrès 第 16 届欧盟会计师协会年度大会 2023 年 10 月 19-21 日,瓦雷泽 - 会议宫
Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI: 10.1097/spv.0000000000001521
{"title":"16th EUGA Annual Congress 19-21 October 2023, Varese – Palais des Congrès","authors":"","doi":"10.1097/spv.0000000000001521","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/spv.0000000000001521","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":517282,"journal":{"name":"Urogynecology","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141233633","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Access to Urogynecologic Care in Federally Qualified Health Centers: A Mystery Caller Study. 联邦合格医疗中心的泌尿妇科医疗服务:神秘来电研究。
Pub Date : 2024-04-25 DOI: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000001514
Micah G Pascual, Atieh Novin, M. Corbisiero, S. Unciano, Y. Hachicha, N. Shelden, Wyanet Bresnitz, Tanaz R. Ferzandi, Tyler M Muffly
IMPORTANCEFederally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) play an important role in providing care to underserved populations. However, little is known about the availability of urogynecology services at FQHCs.OBJECTIVESThis study aimed to assess the availability of appointments for urogynecology care and to determine the prevalence of FQHCs offering urogynecologic services.STUDY DESIGNA total of 362 FQHCs across the United States were randomly selected from the Health Resources and Services Administration website, based on specific inclusion criteria. Researchers called the FQHCs and requested the earliest available appointment for pelvic organ prolapse. The availability of urogynecologic services such as pessary fittings, pelvic floor physical therapy, and urodynamic studies was also inquired.RESULTSA total of 362 FQHCs located in 46 states and the District of Columbia were called. On average, the 362 FQHCs had been established for 19.9 (SD ±15) years, were located in urban areas, and served a median county population of 24,573. Of the 220 FQHCs successfully contacted, 81% (180/220) reported that they could provide care for a patient with pelvic organ prolapse at an appointment 29.1 business days (SD ±30 days) from the date of the call, on average. However, only a small percentage of these FQHCs offered in-office pessary fittings (11%), complex multichannel urodynamics testing (8.6%), or pelvic floor physical therapy (5%).CONCLUSIONThe availability of treatments for pelvic floor disorders at FQHCs is limited. These findings highlight a potential disparity in access to urogynecology services for individuals with public insurance.
重要性联邦合格保健中心(FQHC)在为服务不足的人群提供医疗服务方面发挥着重要作用。本研究旨在评估泌尿妇科护理预约的可用性,并确定提供泌尿妇科服务的联邦合格健康中心的普及率。研究设计根据特定的纳入标准,从卫生资源和服务管理局网站上随机抽取了全美 362 家联邦合格健康中心。研究人员致电这些 FQHC,要求尽早预约盆腔器官脱垂患者。研究人员还询问了泌尿妇科服务的提供情况,如子宫环安装、盆底物理治疗和尿动力学研究。结果研究人员共致电了位于 46 个州和哥伦比亚特区的 362 家 FQHC。这 362 家 FQHC 平均成立时间为 19.9 年(SD ±15),均位于城市地区,服务的县人口中位数为 24,573 人。在成功联系到的 220 家 FQHC 中,81%(180/220)的 FQHC 报告说,他们可以为盆腔脏器脱垂患者提供护理服务,预约时间平均为自呼叫之日起 29.1 个工作日(SD ±30)。然而,在这些 FQHC 中,仅有一小部分提供诊室内窥阴器安装(11%)、复杂多通道尿动力学检测(8.6%)或盆底物理治疗(5%)。这些发现凸显了享受公共保险的个人在获得泌尿妇科服务方面可能存在的差距。
{"title":"Access to Urogynecologic Care in Federally Qualified Health Centers: A Mystery Caller Study.","authors":"Micah G Pascual, Atieh Novin, M. Corbisiero, S. Unciano, Y. Hachicha, N. Shelden, Wyanet Bresnitz, Tanaz R. Ferzandi, Tyler M Muffly","doi":"10.1097/SPV.0000000000001514","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000001514","url":null,"abstract":"IMPORTANCE\u0000Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) play an important role in providing care to underserved populations. However, little is known about the availability of urogynecology services at FQHCs.\u0000\u0000\u0000OBJECTIVES\u0000This study aimed to assess the availability of appointments for urogynecology care and to determine the prevalence of FQHCs offering urogynecologic services.\u0000\u0000\u0000STUDY DESIGN\u0000A total of 362 FQHCs across the United States were randomly selected from the Health Resources and Services Administration website, based on specific inclusion criteria. Researchers called the FQHCs and requested the earliest available appointment for pelvic organ prolapse. The availability of urogynecologic services such as pessary fittings, pelvic floor physical therapy, and urodynamic studies was also inquired.\u0000\u0000\u0000RESULTS\u0000A total of 362 FQHCs located in 46 states and the District of Columbia were called. On average, the 362 FQHCs had been established for 19.9 (SD ±15) years, were located in urban areas, and served a median county population of 24,573. Of the 220 FQHCs successfully contacted, 81% (180/220) reported that they could provide care for a patient with pelvic organ prolapse at an appointment 29.1 business days (SD ±30 days) from the date of the call, on average. However, only a small percentage of these FQHCs offered in-office pessary fittings (11%), complex multichannel urodynamics testing (8.6%), or pelvic floor physical therapy (5%).\u0000\u0000\u0000CONCLUSION\u0000The availability of treatments for pelvic floor disorders at FQHCs is limited. These findings highlight a potential disparity in access to urogynecology services for individuals with public insurance.","PeriodicalId":517282,"journal":{"name":"Urogynecology","volume":"48 42","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140656863","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Laser and Pelvic Floor Muscle Training for Urinary Incontinence: A Randomized Clinical Trial. 激光和盆底肌肉训练治疗尿失禁:随机临床试验
Pub Date : 2024-04-25 DOI: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000001516
Samantha Conde Rocha-Rangel, Gláucia Miranda Varella Pereira, C. Juliato, L. G. O. Brito
IMPORTANCEPelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) is considered the first option as a conservative treatment for female stress urinary incontinence (SUI). However, there is still debate whether energy-based devices are effective for treating SUI.OBJECTIVEThe objective of this study was to assess whether PFMT and fractional CO2 laser therapy may improve symptoms in women with SUI.STUDY DESIGNA parallel, randomized, nonblinded, noninferiority trial included 94 of 144 women 18 years or older with SUI randomized into 2 groups. The CO2 laser group (n = 47) received 3 vaginal applications at monthly intervals. The PFMT group (n = 47) underwent 2 weekly sessions. Primary outcome was the mean difference of International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short-Form (ICIQ-UI-SF) total scores between groups after 3 and 6 months. Main secondary outcomes were questionnaires for assessment of pelvic floor symptoms (Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire-Short Form 7 [PFIQ-7]), sexual function (Female Sexual Function Index [FSFI]), and improvement after treatment (Patient Global Impression of Improvement [PGI-I]).RESULTSA reduction in the ICIQ-UI-SF total score, PFIQ total score, and the Urinary Impact Questionnaire score was perceived between baseline and 3-6 months in both groups. CO2 laser did not reach the noninferiority margin when compared with PFMT in both follow-up periods and analyses. Pelvic floor muscle training has improved the FSFI desire domain between baseline and 3-6 months, whereas CO2 laser improved the FSFI orgasm, pain, and total score after 3 months and FSFI orgasm and total score after 6 months. PGI-I assessment has shown an improvement in both groups.CONCLUSIONFractional CO2 laser therapy was noninferior to PFMT after 3-6 months of treatment. Both groups presented a reduction in the ICIQ-UI-SF scores, and both methods could be considered for women with SUI.
重要意义盆底肌肉训练(PFMT)被认为是保守治疗女性压力性尿失禁(SUI)的首选方法。本研究的目的是评估 PFMT 和点阵式 CO2 激光疗法是否能改善 SUI 女性患者的症状。研究设计包括一项平行、随机、非盲、非劣效试验,144 名 18 岁或以上 SUI 女性患者中的 94 人被随机分为两组。CO2 激光组(47 人)每月接受 3 次阴道激光治疗。PFMT 组(47 人)每周接受 2 次治疗。主要结果是3个月和6个月后两组尿失禁国际咨询问卷-尿失禁简表(ICIQ-UI-SF)总分的平均差异。主要次要结果是盆底症状评估问卷(盆底影响问卷-简表 7 [PFIQ-7])、性功能(女性性功能指数 [FSFI])以及治疗后的改善情况(患者总体改善印象 [PGI-I])。在两个随访期和分析中,CO2 激光与盆底肌肉运动疗法相比均未达到非劣效区。盆底肌肉训练改善了基线至 3-6 个月期间的 FSFI 欲望域,而 CO2 激光则改善了 3 个月后的 FSFI 性高潮、疼痛和总分,以及 6 个月后的 FSFI 性高潮和总分。结论在治疗 3-6 个月后,点阵 CO2 激光疗法的效果不逊于 PFMT。两组患者的 ICIQ-UI-SF 评分均有所下降,患有 SUI 的女性可考虑采用这两种方法。
{"title":"Laser and Pelvic Floor Muscle Training for Urinary Incontinence: A Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Samantha Conde Rocha-Rangel, Gláucia Miranda Varella Pereira, C. Juliato, L. G. O. Brito","doi":"10.1097/SPV.0000000000001516","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000001516","url":null,"abstract":"IMPORTANCE\u0000Pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) is considered the first option as a conservative treatment for female stress urinary incontinence (SUI). However, there is still debate whether energy-based devices are effective for treating SUI.\u0000\u0000\u0000OBJECTIVE\u0000The objective of this study was to assess whether PFMT and fractional CO2 laser therapy may improve symptoms in women with SUI.\u0000\u0000\u0000STUDY DESIGN\u0000A parallel, randomized, nonblinded, noninferiority trial included 94 of 144 women 18 years or older with SUI randomized into 2 groups. The CO2 laser group (n = 47) received 3 vaginal applications at monthly intervals. The PFMT group (n = 47) underwent 2 weekly sessions. Primary outcome was the mean difference of International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short-Form (ICIQ-UI-SF) total scores between groups after 3 and 6 months. Main secondary outcomes were questionnaires for assessment of pelvic floor symptoms (Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire-Short Form 7 [PFIQ-7]), sexual function (Female Sexual Function Index [FSFI]), and improvement after treatment (Patient Global Impression of Improvement [PGI-I]).\u0000\u0000\u0000RESULTS\u0000A reduction in the ICIQ-UI-SF total score, PFIQ total score, and the Urinary Impact Questionnaire score was perceived between baseline and 3-6 months in both groups. CO2 laser did not reach the noninferiority margin when compared with PFMT in both follow-up periods and analyses. Pelvic floor muscle training has improved the FSFI desire domain between baseline and 3-6 months, whereas CO2 laser improved the FSFI orgasm, pain, and total score after 3 months and FSFI orgasm and total score after 6 months. PGI-I assessment has shown an improvement in both groups.\u0000\u0000\u0000CONCLUSION\u0000Fractional CO2 laser therapy was noninferior to PFMT after 3-6 months of treatment. Both groups presented a reduction in the ICIQ-UI-SF scores, and both methods could be considered for women with SUI.","PeriodicalId":517282,"journal":{"name":"Urogynecology","volume":"1 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140652830","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Suture-Needle Management Device and Novel Port Configuration for Robotic Sacrocolpopexy. 用于机器人骶尾部结肠切除术的缝合针管理装置和新型端口配置。
Pub Date : 2024-04-24 DOI: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000001517
Deepanjana Das, Natalie Squires, Margaret G. Mueller, Sarah Collins, C. Lewicky-Gaupp, C. Bretschneider, J. Geynisman-Tan, Kimberly S Kenton
IMPORTANCERobot-assisted sacrocolpopexy (SCP) is a commonly performed procedure for the repair of apical pelvic organ prolapse; therefore, novel devices and techniques to improve safety and efficacy of this procedure should be explored.OBJECTIVEThe objective of this study was to assess safety and efficacy of 8-mm trocar site for use of a disposable suture/needle management device (StitchKit; Origami Surgical, Madison, NJ) for robot-assisted SCP with a 4-arm configuration and no assistant port.STUDY DESIGNThis is a retrospective case series of patients undergoing robot-assisted SCP at a tertiary center from 2018 to 2021. All surgical procedures were performed using four 8-mm robotic trocars and StitchKit device. Our objective was to review all cases in which this technique was used to determine whether the approach resulted in a safely completed procedure and any complications or adverse events. Secondary objectives were to describe patient and operative characteristics.RESULTSIn total, 422 patients underwent robot-assisted SCP for pelvic organ prolapse. The mean age was 60 ± 10 years, and mean body mass index was 27 ± 6 (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared). Most patients had stage 3 prolapse (73%) and underwent concomitant hysterectomy (70%). Ninety-nine percent (n = 416) of cases were completed robotically. StitchKit was successfully inserted and removed in all robotic cases with correct needle counts. All patients had postoperative visits, and 80% followed up at 3 months. No umbilical/port site hernias, operative site infections, or adverse events were reported.CONCLUSIONSRobot-assisted SCP can be performed safely using a 4-arm robotic configuration and suture kit device. This setup eliminates incisions greater than 8 mm and an assistant port, allowing for surgical efficiency without compromising patient outcomes.
重要性机器人辅助骶尾部结肠切除术(SCP)是修复顶端盆腔器官脱垂的常用手术;因此,应探索新型设备和技术来提高该手术的安全性和有效性。本研究的目的是评估8毫米套管部位使用一次性缝合/针管理装置(StitchKit;Origami Surgical,Madison,NJ)进行机器人辅助SCP手术的安全性和有效性,该装置采用4臂配置,无辅助端口。研究设计这是一项回顾性病例系列研究,研究对象是2018年至2021年在一家三级中心接受机器人辅助SCP手术的患者。所有手术均使用四个 8 毫米机器人套管和 StitchKit 设备进行。我们的目标是回顾使用该技术的所有病例,以确定该方法是否能安全完成手术,以及是否存在并发症或不良事件。结果共有 422 名患者接受了机器人辅助 SCP 治疗盆腔器官脱垂。平均年龄为 60 ± 10 岁,平均体重指数为 27 ± 6(以体重(公斤)除以身高(米)的平方计算)。大多数患者为脱垂 3 期(73%),同时接受了子宫切除术(70%)。99%的病例(n = 416)是通过机器人完成的。在所有机器人病例中,StitchKit 都能成功插入和取出,针数正确无误。所有患者均接受了术后访视,80%的患者接受了3个月的随访。结论使用四臂机器人配置和缝合套件设备可以安全地进行机器人辅助 SCP。这种设置省去了大于 8 毫米的切口和辅助端口,提高了手术效率,同时不影响患者的治疗效果。
{"title":"Suture-Needle Management Device and Novel Port Configuration for Robotic Sacrocolpopexy.","authors":"Deepanjana Das, Natalie Squires, Margaret G. Mueller, Sarah Collins, C. Lewicky-Gaupp, C. Bretschneider, J. Geynisman-Tan, Kimberly S Kenton","doi":"10.1097/SPV.0000000000001517","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000001517","url":null,"abstract":"IMPORTANCE\u0000Robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy (SCP) is a commonly performed procedure for the repair of apical pelvic organ prolapse; therefore, novel devices and techniques to improve safety and efficacy of this procedure should be explored.\u0000\u0000\u0000OBJECTIVE\u0000The objective of this study was to assess safety and efficacy of 8-mm trocar site for use of a disposable suture/needle management device (StitchKit; Origami Surgical, Madison, NJ) for robot-assisted SCP with a 4-arm configuration and no assistant port.\u0000\u0000\u0000STUDY DESIGN\u0000This is a retrospective case series of patients undergoing robot-assisted SCP at a tertiary center from 2018 to 2021. All surgical procedures were performed using four 8-mm robotic trocars and StitchKit device. Our objective was to review all cases in which this technique was used to determine whether the approach resulted in a safely completed procedure and any complications or adverse events. Secondary objectives were to describe patient and operative characteristics.\u0000\u0000\u0000RESULTS\u0000In total, 422 patients underwent robot-assisted SCP for pelvic organ prolapse. The mean age was 60 ± 10 years, and mean body mass index was 27 ± 6 (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared). Most patients had stage 3 prolapse (73%) and underwent concomitant hysterectomy (70%). Ninety-nine percent (n = 416) of cases were completed robotically. StitchKit was successfully inserted and removed in all robotic cases with correct needle counts. All patients had postoperative visits, and 80% followed up at 3 months. No umbilical/port site hernias, operative site infections, or adverse events were reported.\u0000\u0000\u0000CONCLUSIONS\u0000Robot-assisted SCP can be performed safely using a 4-arm robotic configuration and suture kit device. This setup eliminates incisions greater than 8 mm and an assistant port, allowing for surgical efficiency without compromising patient outcomes.","PeriodicalId":517282,"journal":{"name":"Urogynecology","volume":"33 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140660716","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Pudendal Block at the Time of Transvaginal Prolapse Repair: A Randomized Controlled Trial. 经阴道脱垂修复术时的阴道阻滞:随机对照试验。
Pub Date : 2024-04-19 DOI: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000001448
Michele Torosis, Morgan Fullerton, Daniela Kaefer, Victor Nitti, A. L. Ackerman, T. Grisales
IMPORTANCEThe utility of pudendal nerve blocks (PNBs) at the time of transvaginal surgery is mixed in the literature. No published study has evaluated the efficacy of PNB since the widespread adoption of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) pathways.OBJECTIVEThis study aimed to determine if PNB, in addition to ERAS measures, at the time of vaginal reconstructive surgery reduces opioid use in the immediate postoperative period.STUDY DESIGNIn this randomized, blinded, controlled trial, women scheduled for transvaginal multicompartment prolapse repair were randomized to bilateral PNB before incision with 20 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine versus usual care. Primary outcome was opioid use in morphine milligram equivalents (MME) for the first 24 hours. The study was powered to detect a 5.57-MME difference in opioid use in the first 24 hours between groups.RESULTSForty-four patients were randomized from January 2020 to April 2022. The PNB and control groups were well matched in demographic and surgical data. There was no difference in opioid use in first 24 hours between the control and PNB groups (8 [0-20] vs 6.7 [0-15]; P = 0.8). Median pain scores at 24 and 48 hours did not differ between groups (4 ± 2 vs 3 ± 3; P = 0.44) and 90% of participants were satisfied with pain control across both groups. Time to return to normal activities (median, 10 days) was also not different between the groups.CONCLUSIONSBecause pain satisfaction after transvaginal surgery in the era of ERAS is high, with overall low opioid requirements, PNB provides no additional benefit.
重要性经阴道手术时进行阴部神经阻滞 (PNB) 的效用在文献中说法不一。本研究旨在确定在阴道重建手术时,除了采用 ERAS 措施外,PNB 是否还能减少术后初期阿片类药物的使用。研究设计在这项随机、盲法对照试验中,计划接受经阴道多室脱垂修复术的女性被随机分为在切口前使用 20 mL 0.5% 布比卡因进行双侧 PNB 与常规护理两种。主要结果是头 24 小时的阿片类药物使用量(吗啡毫克当量)。结果从 2020 年 1 月到 2022 年 4 月,44 名患者接受了随机分组。PNB 组和对照组在人口统计学和手术数据方面完全匹配。对照组和 PNB 组在最初 24 小时的阿片类药物使用量没有差异(8 [0-20] vs 6.7 [0-15]; P = 0.8)。两组患者在 24 小时和 48 小时内的疼痛评分中位数没有差异(4 ± 2 vs 3 ± 3;P = 0.44),两组均有 90% 的患者对疼痛控制感到满意。结论由于ERAS时代经阴道手术后的疼痛满意度很高,对阿片类药物的总体需求很低,因此PNB不会带来额外的益处。
{"title":"Pudendal Block at the Time of Transvaginal Prolapse Repair: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Michele Torosis, Morgan Fullerton, Daniela Kaefer, Victor Nitti, A. L. Ackerman, T. Grisales","doi":"10.1097/SPV.0000000000001448","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000001448","url":null,"abstract":"IMPORTANCE\u0000The utility of pudendal nerve blocks (PNBs) at the time of transvaginal surgery is mixed in the literature. No published study has evaluated the efficacy of PNB since the widespread adoption of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) pathways.\u0000\u0000\u0000OBJECTIVE\u0000This study aimed to determine if PNB, in addition to ERAS measures, at the time of vaginal reconstructive surgery reduces opioid use in the immediate postoperative period.\u0000\u0000\u0000STUDY DESIGN\u0000In this randomized, blinded, controlled trial, women scheduled for transvaginal multicompartment prolapse repair were randomized to bilateral PNB before incision with 20 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine versus usual care. Primary outcome was opioid use in morphine milligram equivalents (MME) for the first 24 hours. The study was powered to detect a 5.57-MME difference in opioid use in the first 24 hours between groups.\u0000\u0000\u0000RESULTS\u0000Forty-four patients were randomized from January 2020 to April 2022. The PNB and control groups were well matched in demographic and surgical data. There was no difference in opioid use in first 24 hours between the control and PNB groups (8 [0-20] vs 6.7 [0-15]; P = 0.8). Median pain scores at 24 and 48 hours did not differ between groups (4 ± 2 vs 3 ± 3; P = 0.44) and 90% of participants were satisfied with pain control across both groups. Time to return to normal activities (median, 10 days) was also not different between the groups.\u0000\u0000\u0000CONCLUSIONS\u0000Because pain satisfaction after transvaginal surgery in the era of ERAS is high, with overall low opioid requirements, PNB provides no additional benefit.","PeriodicalId":517282,"journal":{"name":"Urogynecology","volume":" 49","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140685267","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Specialty-Specific Trends in Surgery for Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse Post Vaginal Mesh. 阴道网片术后顶端盆腔器官脱垂手术的专科趋势。
Pub Date : 2024-04-15 DOI: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000001458
Rahul Dutta, Raymond Xu, D. Wolff, Gopal Badlani, C. Matthews
IMPORTANCESince transvaginal mesh (VM) kits for apical pelvic organ prolapse (APOP) were labeled "high-risk" in 2016 and subsequently banned in 2019 by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, the most common remaining surgical options include abdominal mesh-augmented sacrocolpopexy (AS) and transvaginal native tissue suspension (VN).OBJECTIVEThe objective of this study was to determine temporal trends in APOP procedures for urologists and gynecologists.STUDY DESIGNBetween 2011 and 2020, the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried for AS, VM, and VN.RESULTSThere were 26,477 cases of APOP repair (32% AS, 6% VM, 62% VN) included, 9% by urologists. Urologists operated on older (65 vs 61 years) patients with more medical comorbidities. Urologists performed significantly higher proportion of AS (65% vs 29%) and VM (8% vs 6%) relative to VN (27% vs 65%) than gynecologists (P < 0.0001). Transvaginal mesh utilization has decreased over time for both specialties (P < 0.05); nonsignificant trends toward increasing AS (P = 0.1646) in urologists and VN (P = 0.0913) in gynecologists concurrently occurred. Significant independent predictors of the operating surgeon being a urologist were surgery being performed in the latter half of the cohort (2016-2020; odds ratio [OR], 1.22), non-White patient race (OR < 1 for all), a concomitant sling being placed (OR = 0.89), the surgery being VM (OR = 2.95) or AS (OR = 4.36), the patient being older (OR > 1 for each age range), and having a higher frailty index score (OR = 1.16).CONCLUSIONSSignificant differences in APOP repair choices exist between specialties. Urologists operate on older, more medically complex patients while demonstrating a strong preference for mesh-augmented compared with transvaginal native tissue repairs.
重要意义自 2016 年经阴道网片 (VM) 套件治疗顶端盆腔器官脱垂 (APOP) 被贴上 "高风险 "标签并随后于 2019 年被美国食品和药物管理局禁用以来,最常见的剩余手术选择包括腹部网片垫片骶骨结节成形术 (AS) 和经阴道原生组织悬吊术 (VN)。本研究的目的是确定泌尿科医生和妇科医生进行 APOP 手术的时间趋势。研究设计在 2011 年至 2020 年期间,对美国外科医生学会国家手术质量改进计划数据库中的 AS、VM 和 VN 进行了查询。结果共纳入 26,477 例 APOP 修复病例(32% AS、6% VM、62% VN),其中 9% 由泌尿科医生实施。泌尿科医生手术的患者年龄较大(65 岁对 61 岁),合并症较多。相对于 VN(27% 对 65%),泌尿科医生进行 AS(65% 对 29%)和 VM(8% 对 6%)手术的比例明显高于妇科医生(P < 0.0001)。随着时间的推移,两个专科的经阴道网片使用率都有所下降(P < 0.05);同时,泌尿科医师的 AS(P = 0.1646)和妇科医师的 VN(P = 0.0913)也出现了不明显的增加趋势。手术医生为泌尿科医生的重要独立预测因素包括:手术在队列的后半期(2016-2020 年;比值比 [OR],1.22)进行、非白人患者种族(所有比值比均小于 1)、同时放置吊带(OR = 0.结论不同专业在 APOP 修复选择上存在显著差异。泌尿科医生为年龄更大、病情更复杂的患者进行手术,与经阴道原生组织修复术相比,他们更倾向于选择网片增强型修复术。
{"title":"Specialty-Specific Trends in Surgery for Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse Post Vaginal Mesh.","authors":"Rahul Dutta, Raymond Xu, D. Wolff, Gopal Badlani, C. Matthews","doi":"10.1097/SPV.0000000000001458","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000001458","url":null,"abstract":"IMPORTANCE\u0000Since transvaginal mesh (VM) kits for apical pelvic organ prolapse (APOP) were labeled \"high-risk\" in 2016 and subsequently banned in 2019 by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, the most common remaining surgical options include abdominal mesh-augmented sacrocolpopexy (AS) and transvaginal native tissue suspension (VN).\u0000\u0000\u0000OBJECTIVE\u0000The objective of this study was to determine temporal trends in APOP procedures for urologists and gynecologists.\u0000\u0000\u0000STUDY DESIGN\u0000Between 2011 and 2020, the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried for AS, VM, and VN.\u0000\u0000\u0000RESULTS\u0000There were 26,477 cases of APOP repair (32% AS, 6% VM, 62% VN) included, 9% by urologists. Urologists operated on older (65 vs 61 years) patients with more medical comorbidities. Urologists performed significantly higher proportion of AS (65% vs 29%) and VM (8% vs 6%) relative to VN (27% vs 65%) than gynecologists (P < 0.0001). Transvaginal mesh utilization has decreased over time for both specialties (P < 0.05); nonsignificant trends toward increasing AS (P = 0.1646) in urologists and VN (P = 0.0913) in gynecologists concurrently occurred. Significant independent predictors of the operating surgeon being a urologist were surgery being performed in the latter half of the cohort (2016-2020; odds ratio [OR], 1.22), non-White patient race (OR < 1 for all), a concomitant sling being placed (OR = 0.89), the surgery being VM (OR = 2.95) or AS (OR = 4.36), the patient being older (OR > 1 for each age range), and having a higher frailty index score (OR = 1.16).\u0000\u0000\u0000CONCLUSIONS\u0000Significant differences in APOP repair choices exist between specialties. Urologists operate on older, more medically complex patients while demonstrating a strong preference for mesh-augmented compared with transvaginal native tissue repairs.","PeriodicalId":517282,"journal":{"name":"Urogynecology","volume":"319 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140703515","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Diet Intake After Diet Modification Intervention in Women With Fecal Incontinence. 对大便失禁妇女进行饮食调整干预后的饮食摄入量。
Pub Date : 2024-04-11 DOI: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000001480
Jaclyn M Muñoz, Molly Groskreutz, Charlene Compher, U. Andy
IMPORTANCEOlder women with fecal incontinence (FI) who underwent diet modification intervention (DMI) showed significant improvement in FI symptoms. It is unclear whether improvement in symptoms was associated with objective changes in dietary intake quality.OBJECTIVESThe primary aim was to determine if improvement in overall dietary intake quality was associated with improvement in FI symptoms. Our secondary aim was to evaluate whether individual food group consumption changes were associated with changes in FI symptoms.STUDY DESIGNThis was an ancillary analysis of a prospective cohort study of women aged 65 years and older with FI who underwent DMI. Seven-day diet-and-bowel diaries at baseline and 6 weeks after DMI were examined for how frequently participants consumed food categories and FI triggers. Adherence to recommended dietary guidelines was assessed between 2 and 4 weeks using a 24-hour diet recall. Baseline and postintervention consumption were compared using the Wilcoxon signed rank test. Spearman correlation was used to compare dietary intake changes with FI symptom changes.RESULTSTwenty-four women completed the 24-hour diet recalls, and 17 women completed the 7-day diet-and-bowel diaries at baseline and 6 weeks. More participants who were adherent had clinically significant improvement in symptoms compared with those who were not adherent (70% vs 30%, P=0.57). Decreased consumption of saturated fats (P=0.01) and fried foods (P<0.001) was associated with improvement in FI symptoms.CONCLUSIONSIn this small population, overall dietary intake quality was not associated with change in FI symptom improvement. Decreased intake of saturated fat and fried food was associated with FI symptom improvement.
主要内容患有大便失禁(FI)的老年妇女接受饮食调整干预(DMI)后,FI症状有明显改善。目前还不清楚症状的改善是否与膳食摄入质量的客观变化有关。目标:我们的首要目标是确定总体膳食摄入质量的改善是否与大便失禁症状的改善有关。我们的次要目的是评估单个食物组摄入量的变化是否与 FI 症状的变化有关。研究设计这是一项前瞻性队列研究的辅助分析,研究对象是 65 岁及以上患有 FI 并接受了 DMI 的女性。在基线和DMI后6周,研究人员通过七天饮食和肠道日记来了解参与者摄入食物种类和FI诱发因素的频率。在2周至4周期间,采用24小时饮食回忆法对推荐饮食指南的遵守情况进行评估。使用 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验比较基线和干预后的消耗量。结果24名妇女完成了24小时饮食回顾,17名妇女完成了基线和6周的7天饮食和肠道日记。与未坚持饮食的参与者相比,更多坚持饮食的参与者症状得到了明显改善(70% 对 30%,P=0.57)。饱和脂肪(P=0.01)和油炸食品(P<0.001)摄入量的减少与肠梗阻症状的改善有关。饱和脂肪和油炸食品摄入量的减少与FI症状的改善有关。
{"title":"Diet Intake After Diet Modification Intervention in Women With Fecal Incontinence.","authors":"Jaclyn M Muñoz, Molly Groskreutz, Charlene Compher, U. Andy","doi":"10.1097/SPV.0000000000001480","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000001480","url":null,"abstract":"IMPORTANCE\u0000Older women with fecal incontinence (FI) who underwent diet modification intervention (DMI) showed significant improvement in FI symptoms. It is unclear whether improvement in symptoms was associated with objective changes in dietary intake quality.\u0000\u0000\u0000OBJECTIVES\u0000The primary aim was to determine if improvement in overall dietary intake quality was associated with improvement in FI symptoms. Our secondary aim was to evaluate whether individual food group consumption changes were associated with changes in FI symptoms.\u0000\u0000\u0000STUDY DESIGN\u0000This was an ancillary analysis of a prospective cohort study of women aged 65 years and older with FI who underwent DMI. Seven-day diet-and-bowel diaries at baseline and 6 weeks after DMI were examined for how frequently participants consumed food categories and FI triggers. Adherence to recommended dietary guidelines was assessed between 2 and 4 weeks using a 24-hour diet recall. Baseline and postintervention consumption were compared using the Wilcoxon signed rank test. Spearman correlation was used to compare dietary intake changes with FI symptom changes.\u0000\u0000\u0000RESULTS\u0000Twenty-four women completed the 24-hour diet recalls, and 17 women completed the 7-day diet-and-bowel diaries at baseline and 6 weeks. More participants who were adherent had clinically significant improvement in symptoms compared with those who were not adherent (70% vs 30%, P=0.57). Decreased consumption of saturated fats (P=0.01) and fried foods (P<0.001) was associated with improvement in FI symptoms.\u0000\u0000\u0000CONCLUSIONS\u0000In this small population, overall dietary intake quality was not associated with change in FI symptom improvement. Decreased intake of saturated fat and fried food was associated with FI symptom improvement.","PeriodicalId":517282,"journal":{"name":"Urogynecology","volume":"48 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140713620","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Patient Perspectives Following Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury. 产科肛门括约肌损伤后患者的观点。
Pub Date : 2024-04-10 DOI: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000001506
Alexandra C Nutaitis, Cecile A Ferrando, Katie Propst
IMPORTANCEAn obstetric anal sphincter injury can significantly affect patients. Support for these patients is both limited and not well understood.OBJECTIVEThe aim of this study was to describe patient experiences after an obstetric anal sphincter injury.STUDY DESIGNThis is a prospective cross-sectional qualitative study of patients who experienced an obstetric anal sphincter injury within a tertiary care network between May and June of 2022. Demographic data, clinical data regarding the delivery, and the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale were collected. Prospective semistructured interviews were conducted approximately 5-12 weeks postpartum to address opportunities to improve obstetric anal sphincter injury care. Qualitative analysis was performed using a grounded theory approach.RESULTSFifteen women with a mean age of 31 (±3.93) years participated. The majority identified as White (93.3%) and non-Hispanic (100%). All participants identified as being married to men and completing undergraduate education; 9 (60%) also received postgraduate education. Five participants (33.3%) screened positive (score of 10 or greater) for postnatal depression on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. Thematic saturation was reached with 3 major themes identified: (1) pain control, (2) desire for multifactorial support, and (3) obstetric anal sphincter injury knowledge and awareness.CONCLUSIONSExperiencing an obstetric anal sphincter injury represents a great unknown to most women. This study identifies opportunities for improved postpartum care through education, pain control, and patient support. Interventions are needed to improve the postpartum experience for women who experience an obstetric anal sphincter injury with childbirth.
重要性产科肛门括约肌损伤会对患者造成严重影响。本研究旨在描述产科肛门括约肌损伤后患者的经历。研究设计这是一项前瞻性横断面定性研究,研究对象是 2022 年 5 月至 6 月间在一家三级医疗网络内经历过产科肛门括约肌损伤的患者。研究收集了人口统计学数据、分娩临床数据和爱丁堡产后抑郁量表。在产后约 5-12 周进行了前瞻性半结构式访谈,以探讨改善产科肛门括约肌损伤护理的机会。结果15名平均年龄为31(±3.93)岁的产妇参加了访谈。大多数参与者为白人(93.3%)和非西班牙裔(100%)。所有参与者均已婚并完成了本科教育;其中 9 人(60%)还接受了研究生教育。有 5 名参与者(33.3%)在爱丁堡产后抑郁量表(Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale)中筛查出产后抑郁阳性(10 分或以上)。主题饱和度达到了 3 个主要的主题:(结论对于大多数产妇来说,产科肛门括约肌损伤是一个巨大的未知数。本研究发现了通过教育、疼痛控制和患者支持来改善产后护理的机会。需要采取干预措施来改善产科肛门括约肌损伤产妇的产后体验。
{"title":"Patient Perspectives Following Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury.","authors":"Alexandra C Nutaitis, Cecile A Ferrando, Katie Propst","doi":"10.1097/SPV.0000000000001506","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000001506","url":null,"abstract":"IMPORTANCE\u0000An obstetric anal sphincter injury can significantly affect patients. Support for these patients is both limited and not well understood.\u0000\u0000\u0000OBJECTIVE\u0000The aim of this study was to describe patient experiences after an obstetric anal sphincter injury.\u0000\u0000\u0000STUDY DESIGN\u0000This is a prospective cross-sectional qualitative study of patients who experienced an obstetric anal sphincter injury within a tertiary care network between May and June of 2022. Demographic data, clinical data regarding the delivery, and the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale were collected. Prospective semistructured interviews were conducted approximately 5-12 weeks postpartum to address opportunities to improve obstetric anal sphincter injury care. Qualitative analysis was performed using a grounded theory approach.\u0000\u0000\u0000RESULTS\u0000Fifteen women with a mean age of 31 (±3.93) years participated. The majority identified as White (93.3%) and non-Hispanic (100%). All participants identified as being married to men and completing undergraduate education; 9 (60%) also received postgraduate education. Five participants (33.3%) screened positive (score of 10 or greater) for postnatal depression on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. Thematic saturation was reached with 3 major themes identified: (1) pain control, (2) desire for multifactorial support, and (3) obstetric anal sphincter injury knowledge and awareness.\u0000\u0000\u0000CONCLUSIONS\u0000Experiencing an obstetric anal sphincter injury represents a great unknown to most women. This study identifies opportunities for improved postpartum care through education, pain control, and patient support. Interventions are needed to improve the postpartum experience for women who experience an obstetric anal sphincter injury with childbirth.","PeriodicalId":517282,"journal":{"name":"Urogynecology","volume":"62 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140716706","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Urogynecology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1